Today we'll look at tournament selection and bankroll management:
1/ During the WSOP you can expect to see very large field sizes of up to 10k runners. When looking at bankroll management for tournaments, players often neglect to factor in the effect that field size can have on variance.
3/ There are many ways to use this but let’s look at the effect of field size on variance. Imagine we’re going to play an average buy-in of $1k during the series and we’ll look to play at least 50 tournaments and assume an avg field size of 2500 players and ROI of 30%.
4/ So here we can see that over 50 mtts, that we can expect to have a losing series over 75% of the time, potentially losing as much as $45,000.
5/ Let’s change this a bit by reducing the field size to 1000 players, keeping the other parameters the same.
6/ The numbers look a bit better here, we’re now only having a losing series 61% of the time. This is a very high probability of having a losing series despite being selective with our field size.
7/ What if we increase our ROI? Let’s take a look at a player with 50% ROI that plays a field size of 2500…
We can see that they now have a 65.9% of having a losing sample compared to the 30% ROI player.
8/ If this player now chooses to play a smaller average field size of 1000, their probability of loss drops to 55.5%
9/ So the key takeaway here is that we want to be make sure that we’re a pretty big winner in the tournaments that we’re playing. This will increase our EV and reduce the chance that we having a losing series. Field size also has a pretty big impact on the variance.
10/ Another factor that we can consider is the option of being selling some of our tournament action at a markup. Assuming we play $50,000 worth of buyins and sell at a markup of 1.15, this would equate to saving $14,375 of buy-ins.
11/ 1.15 markup means that we’re selling at $1.15 for every 1% of action that we sell. We’re essentially locking in an ROI of 15% on 1/4 of our total buyins. Of course this means that we’re giving up some EV. But we greatly reduce the risk of our series.
12/ To think of this is imagine that we showed up and played all the tournaments but sold 100% of our action at 1.15MU. We would put up none of the buy-ins and make a guaranteed profit of $7500. Some great players are able to charge higher markup, making even more from selling.
13/ Of course most players typically want to have a piece of whatever they’re playing. So they sell less than that.
14/ Another way that players typically reduce their risk by swapping with other players. We need to trust that the players we swap with will pay their swap out. (Many cases of this issue occurring in the past). We could be giving up EV if these other players are worse than us.
15/ So before you start firing your buy-ins away during the #WSOP series, make sure you consider some options to reduce your exposure as it can get very expensive very quickly.
If you're looking to work on you game before the series, look no further! Grab a free trial of our solver here: deepsolver.com
Planning to attend the WSOP this year in Vegas? Whether you’re a seasoned pro or first-timer, you’ll benefit from reading some of the information and tips below.
👇
1/ Plan ahead. This is a big series. It’s important to book your flights and accommodation early. Make sure you have your passport and any travel documents (visas) that you may require. Being early will save you money that you can use for buy-ins (you’ll need a lot of them).
2/ Accommodation: Your best bet is somewhere on the strip near the Horseshoe. If travelling with others, consider an Airbnb. You can compare between hotels on the Caesars or MGM resorts sites. Beware of resort fees.
Poker players often obsess over bluffing, value betting is where most of the money is made.
Today, we'll be breakdown a river value betting situation.
1/ The hand starts off with Hero calling a 3bet with AJs. On the flop we face a small cbet and proceed by calling.
We can see here that SB is betting almost entire range and IP proceed mainly by calling.
2/ We arrive at the Qc turn. Here we see that it’s correct for SB to continue betting quite frequently with non Qx hands for value, choosing 1/3 pot with some pocket pairs. Of course, SB has incentive to slowplay some Qx as well.
Donking into the last aggressor is often seen as a fish move. Today we’re going to a river situation where this can be a good play…
👇🧵
1/ Hero defends the big blind with QJo and flops top pair.
We check call vs a small c-bet, a medium sized turn bet and donk out for 1/4 pot on the river.
Why might donking make sense here? Let’s have a look at the action in the solver…
2/ Flop play: Big Blind opts to mainly call here with QJo although we can see some QJs with a backdoor flush draw raising as well as some other top pairs that raise.
Poker is easy when you river the nuts but it's hard when you only beat a bluff
In today’s solver hand breakdown we’re going look at how a hand plays account in a solver across each street.
🧵👇
1/ Flop: OOP checks their entire range and IP bets 50% pot at a very high frequency. OOP continues by calling all their pocket pairs along with some of their best ace-highs and king-highs with backdoor flush draws.
2/ Turn: On this low turn card OOP is actually meant to donk 25% pot at a reasonable frequency. All the overcards missed. Ace-highs now have additional gutshot equity so OOP bets out small to “protect” their pocket pairs, some flush draws, overcards and gutshots.