Charlie Savage Profile picture
May 19 5 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
It occurred to me that one of the dishonest things about @marcthiessen’s column that I pointed out yesterday was actually even more egregious and is another affirmative factual error (a charitable word choice) that the WP should correct./15
When he backed his criticism of the FBI's decision to open a full investigation by misleadingly citing a passage about warrant renewal applications, Thiessen inserted "[the Trump campaign]” into a quote from the report. In context, "the target" instead meant Carter Page./16 ImageImage
Ironically, this comes in the same graph that falsely says the FBI presented a doctored email to the FISA court as evidence. That's wrong–it was not shown to the court–but Thiessen himself demonstrably presented a falsely doctored Durham report quote to WP readers as evidence./17 Image
Indeed, Thiessen's quotation of the report's words "both then and in hindsight" to characterize the FBI's decision to open a full inquiry in July 2016 is also dishonest because in context, "then" was 2017, when the FBI renewed the Page FISA warrants after talking to Danchenko./18 Image
I have submitted a formal corrections request about all these matters to corrections@washpost.com. Let's see what happens. /19

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charlie Savage

Charlie Savage Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @charlie_savage

May 18
.@marcthiessen wrote a shoddy Washington Post column using as a foil the headline of my piece yesterday assessing how the Durham inquiry fell flat after years of political hype. (He didn’t engage with its substance, of course.) A dissection follows. /1
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/…
As an initial matter, Thiessen got his start at a lobbying firm that included two named partners – Paul Manafort and Roger Stone – who were convicted of felonies in the Russia investigation & pardoned by Trump. He does not disclose that conflict to the WP’s readers. /2 Image
Thiessen opens by insinuating that I am downplaying Durham bc I'm implicated in (his tendentious portrayal of) the media’s Trump-Russia coverage. Aside from whether he is accurately describing Mueller's complex findings, I wasn't part of the NYT’s Trump-Russia coverage team./3 Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 27
DOJ detention memo for Jack Teixeira storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… /1
DOJ says he smashed his electronics /2 Image
DOJ says he was suspended from high school for talking about violence and making racial threats /3 Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 26
As Alberto @Ibarguen -- the head of the Knight Foundation @knightfdn and former publisher of The @MiamiHerald -- retires, I would like to add a public note of personal appreciation to the encomiums. /1 philanthropy.com/article/knight…
In 1999, when I went to work for The Miami Herald as a cub reporter just out of college and he was its publisher, he took a mentor-like interest in me. We got to know each other over occasional dinners/drinks, a Miami Heat game, etc. /2
In late 2001 or early 2002, when I was thinking about applying for a Knight Foundation journalism fellowship at Yale Law School, he encouraged it (he has a law degree from Penn) and wrote a strong letter of recommendation that really helped me stand out from the pack. /3
Read 5 tweets
Feb 28
The Biden administration is formally launching its effort to persuade Congress to reauthorize Section 702, the warrantless surveillance law set to expire 12/31/23, this morning this letter to Congress from Merrick Garland and Avril Haines. (Story to come.) int.nyt.com/data/documentt…
As part of the 702 push Matt Olsen, the head of the DOJ national security division, is giving this speech at the Brookings Institution this morning, streaming now. brookings.edu/events/a-conve…
Here is an explainer breaking down complicated and consequential legal and technical issues raised by Section 702. nytimes.com/article/warran…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 1
The Wall Street Journal opinion section published a meandering column by Holman Jenkins today riffing off last week's article on the Durham investigation that I wrote with @ktbenner and @adamgoldmanNYT. It was weirdly filled with ad hominem attacks on me (just me) by name. /1
Besides the unnecessary personal attacks, Jenkins claimed I had written something last August that I did not remember writing and could not find in the archives. So I wrote to him requesting a correction./2
From time to time, journalists have to re-learn that it is a mistake to engage with, rather than ignore, bad-faith actors; they use it for more fodder. Jenkins says he will write about our exchange. Rather than let him misrepresent things, I’m going to post its entirety here./3
Read 12 tweets
Jan 26
For months, @ktbenner @adamgoldmanNYT & I have been scrutinizing the Durham investigation into the Russia investigation. It just went online. nytimes.com/2023/01/26/us/…
Among the highlights:
1.Durham opened a criminal investigation into possible financial crimes involving Trump, based on a tip from Italian officials. While it had nothing to do w/ the Russia inquiry, Barr decided Durham should keep control of it. He never brought charges.
2. Durham went after the private emails of a George Soros aide based on a claim in a dubious Russian intel memo. A judge twice rejected his request for an order for info about them, so he turned to grand jury powers to get them, leading to internal dissent on his team.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(