Covid was the most disruptive global crisis since WW2
& the use of NPIs, including lockdown, the most consequential set of policies in modern public health history
Early on, many voiced concern that NPIs would cause widespread social harm, esp for vulnerable/poorer pls.
2/12
Now, a few yrs in future we can evaluate concerns with wisdom of hindsight & based on ALOT of research evidence
That was my goal:
1) What types of adverse societal impacts occurred worldwide 2020-2021? 2) What does current research tell us about the magnitude of impacts?
3/12
I developed a framework to guide this global state of knowledge review. My goal was to be objective & evidence-based, & rely on the cumulative research data in each field.
My final analysis includes >600 research publications
4/12
So, what did I find?
Read the full report!!
In it, I discuss the state of knowledge across 10 areas of harm (2020-21) & over 50 sub-areas👇
Young people, individuals/countries with lower socioeconomic status, women & pls with pre-existing vulnerabilities were hit hardest
5/12
A few high-level findings:
- 14-18 million excess deaths, of which 5-6 million are reported Covid deaths;
- Tens-of-millions of new mental health disorders, especially among young people
- Long-term economic & business damage, including soaring government & private debt
6/12
- $6 trillion of lost income for workers worldwide, and an uneven recovery in 2022
- 200-400 million more people pushed into poverty in 2022 (compared to 2019)
- 350 million more people pushed into food insecurity from 2019 to 2021;
7/12
- A 13% increase in the rate of global learning poverty between 2019 and 2022, erasing all gains in the education sector since 2000. Large dropout rates. An estimated $21 trillion may be lost in earnings for the current generation of students.
8/12
- An increase in negative lifestyle behaviors such as obesity, screen use, insomnia, physical and social impairments in children, frailty among the elderly, addiction, and poor diet.
- Increased child abuse, domestic violence, crime and gender inequality.
9/12
- Declining trust, social cohesion, press freedom, respect for basic human rights, and support for democratic attitudes.
& MUCH MORE.
10/12
In the discussion, I outline the implications of this analysis for the future of global public health and emergency response.
I discuss limitations, knowledge gaps, future research needs, lessons, etc.
11/12
In conclusion
"Societal harms challenge the dominant mental model of the pandemic response.
Planning & response for future global health emergencies must integrate a wider range of expertise to account for and mitigate societal harms associated w government intervention."
End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The magnitude of lockdown & pandemic disruptions in 2020 is hard to appreciate
33% of people lost a job/business, highest in low-middle income countries& social grps, per Wellcome Global Monitoring project (113 countries, late 2020
Analysis suggests Covid-19 boosters likely to cause a net clinical harm to young adults(18-29 yr), where total severe adverse events (SAEs) will outweigh Covid hospitalizations averted
In April, Paul Offit stated in a NEJM editorial:"It is now incumbent on CDC to determine who most benefits from booster dosing & educate the public about the limits of mucosal vaccines"
Do face masks increase social conformity? Yes, based on 10 experiments from China. Masks (supposedly) make u: less likely to run red lights, park a bike in no-parking zones, cheat for money & misbehave in libraries. Wild paper in PNAS, but behind paywall
Prof. Woolhouse=1 of Scotland's most senior ID epidemiologists
🧵/25; my favourite quotes from his book: "The Year the World Went Mad"
"My main aim in writing this book is that lockdown scepticism will become the mainstream view"
"The truth is that we didn't really try to protect the vulnerable. All in all, the under-investment in protecting the vulnerable is one of the most baffling failures of the UK's pandemic response."
"There is comfort in following the crowd even while it is stampeding in the wrong direction. We wouldn't let go of lockdown even after the evidence of the harm it was causing became so compelling that the WHO itself came to reject it."
In April, Paul Offit stated in a NEJM editorial: "It is now incumbent on CDC to determine who most benefits from booster dosing & educate the public about the limits of mucosal vaccines."
"These results raise concerns that mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization."
"We conducted a simple harm-benefit comparison using the trial data comparing excess risk of serious AESI against reductions in COVID-19 hospitalization. We found excess risk of serious AESIs to exceed the reduction in COVID-19 hospitalizations in both Pfizer and Moderna trials."