Kevin Bardosh Profile picture
May 23 12 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
📢How did the Covid response harm society?

Read my new comprehensive evaluation of this important,complex topic

"Research shows collateral damage was substantial, wide-ranging & will leave behind legacy of harm for 100s of millions in yrs ahead"

👇1/12

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… Image
Covid was the most disruptive global crisis since WW2

& the use of NPIs, including lockdown, the most consequential set of policies in modern public health history

Early on, many voiced concern that NPIs would cause widespread social harm, esp for vulnerable/poorer pls.
2/12
Now, a few yrs in future we can evaluate concerns with wisdom of hindsight & based on ALOT of research evidence

That was my goal:

1) What types of adverse societal impacts occurred worldwide 2020-2021?
2) What does current research tell us about the magnitude of impacts?

3/12
I developed a framework to guide this global state of knowledge review. My goal was to be objective & evidence-based, & rely on the cumulative research data in each field.

My final analysis includes >600 research publications
4/12 Image
So, what did I find?

Read the full report!!

In it, I discuss the state of knowledge across 10 areas of harm (2020-21) & over 50 sub-areas👇

Young people, individuals/countries with lower socioeconomic status, women & pls with pre-existing vulnerabilities were hit hardest
5/12 Image
A few high-level findings:

- 14-18 million excess deaths, of which 5-6 million are reported Covid deaths;
- Tens-of-millions of new mental health disorders, especially among young people
- Long-term economic & business damage, including soaring government & private debt
6/12
- $6 trillion of lost income for workers worldwide, and an uneven recovery in 2022
- 200-400 million more people pushed into poverty in 2022 (compared to 2019)
- 350 million more people pushed into food insecurity from 2019 to 2021;
7/12
- A 13% increase in the rate of global learning poverty between 2019 and 2022, erasing all gains in the education sector since 2000. Large dropout rates. An estimated $21 trillion may be lost in earnings for the current generation of students.
8/12
- An increase in negative lifestyle behaviors such as obesity, screen use, insomnia, physical and social impairments in children, frailty among the elderly, addiction, and poor diet.
- Increased child abuse, domestic violence, crime and gender inequality.
9/12
- Declining trust, social cohesion, press freedom, respect for basic human rights, and support for democratic attitudes.

& MUCH MORE.
10/12
In the discussion, I outline the implications of this analysis for the future of global public health and emergency response.

I discuss limitations, knowledge gaps, future research needs, lessons, etc.
11/12
In conclusion

"Societal harms challenge the dominant mental model of the pandemic response.

Planning & response for future global health emergencies must integrate a wider range of expertise to account for and mitigate societal harms associated w government intervention."

End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Bardosh

Kevin Bardosh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KevinBardosh

Feb 11
The magnitude of lockdown & pandemic disruptions in 2020 is hard to appreciate

33% of people lost a job/business, highest in low-middle income countries& social grps, per Wellcome Global Monitoring project (113 countries, late 2020

Other figures👇

cms.wellcome.org/sites/default/…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 5, 2022
📢Read our new paper:

Analysis suggests Covid-19 boosters likely to cause a net clinical harm to young adults(18-29 yr), where total severe adverse events (SAEs) will outweigh Covid hospitalizations averted

Booster mandates are unethical because:1/13🧵
jme.bmj.com/content/early/…
In April, Paul Offit stated in a NEJM editorial:"It is now incumbent on CDC to determine who most benefits from booster dosing & educate the public about the limits of mucosal vaccines"

CDC/FDA has NOT conducted risk-benefit analysis for young people 2/13
nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
So, we took up the challenge.

Over 300 universities & colleges were (as of Sept 2022) mandating boosters across North America (1000 with 2-dose Covid-19 mandates still in place)

Is this a science-based policy?

Is it ethically justified?
3/13
Read 13 tweets
Nov 19, 2022
Do face masks increase social conformity? Yes, based on 10 experiments from China. Masks (supposedly) make u: less likely to run red lights, park a bike in no-parking zones, cheat for money & misbehave in libraries. Wild paper in PNAS, but behind paywall

pnas.org/doi/abs/10.107…
Here is a summary of the findings
and a weird picture....
Read 4 tweets
Sep 21, 2022
Did u support lockdowns but now question them?

Prof. Woolhouse=1 of Scotland's most senior ID epidemiologists

🧵/25; my favourite quotes from his book: "The Year the World Went Mad"

"My main aim in writing this book is that lockdown scepticism will become the mainstream view"
"The truth is that we didn't really try to protect the vulnerable. All in all, the under-investment in protecting the vulnerable is one of the most baffling failures of the UK's pandemic response."
"There is comfort in following the crowd even while it is stampeding in the wrong direction. We wouldn't let go of lockdown even after the evidence of the harm it was causing became so compelling that the WHO itself came to reject it."
Read 27 tweets
Sep 6, 2022
📢NEW-Covid boosters in young adults?

Our risk-benefit analysis shows clinical harms outweigh benefits

University booster mandates are unethical 1/12 🧵

@KrugAlli @ID_ethics @TrudoLemmens @s_keshavjee @VPrasadMDMPH @MartyMakary @sdbaral @TracyBethHoeg

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
In April, Paul Offit stated in a NEJM editorial: "It is now incumbent on CDC to determine who most benefits from booster dosing & educate the public about the limits of mucosal vaccines."

CDC/FDA has NOT conducted risk-benefit analysis for young pls. 2/12
nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
So, we took up the challenge.

Over 300 universities & colleges are mandating boosters across North America (1000 still have 2-dose Covid-19 mandates in place)

Is this a science-based policy?

Is it ethically justified?
3/12
Read 13 tweets
Aug 31, 2022
The Doshi et al. paper on serious adverse events following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination based on the original RCT data has been published.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
"These results raise concerns that mRNA vaccines are associated with more harm than initially estimated at the time of emergency authorization."
"We conducted a simple harm-benefit comparison using the trial data comparing excess risk of serious AESI against reductions in COVID-19 hospitalization. We found excess risk of serious AESIs to exceed the reduction in COVID-19 hospitalizations in both Pfizer and Moderna trials."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(