Daniel Feldman Profile picture
May 27 9 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A lawyer used ChatGPT to do "legal research" and cited a number of nonexistent cases in a filing, and is now in a lot of trouble with the judge 🤣 Image
Ken White (Popehat) has been posting about this on bluesky, I'm sure he'll do a blog post soon
Yay fragmentation of the internet into multiple sites that can't link to each other
In the lawyer's defense, he submitted screenshots FROM CHATGPT claiming that the nonexistent cases exist Image
This is a federal appeals court case. Not, like, parking court 😂
From the defense attorneys:
"The authenticity of many of these cases is questionable" 🤣🤣🤣 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Feldman

Daniel Feldman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @d_feldman

May 27
I wanted to try an experiment: writing a real program using ChatGPT *alone*

I used AIder, a script around ChatGPT that uses it to make edits directly to files on your system, no copying/pasting

Anyway: it worked! Image
It's a game called Operation Conundrum

You get presented a series of small integers, and you have to fill in the operations to make it a valid equation

Just a simple, fun nerd game

(I've heard people sometimes play this with playing cards)

GPT did ALL the editing (I did none)
You can play it right now here: dfeldman.github.io/operation-conu…

A couple of observations:

1) It took quite a few iterations to get this far. I saved the chat history, and I prompted it 77 times (some were repeats and mistakes). The chat is here: github.com/dfeldman/opera…
Read 16 tweets
May 25
So there's this site shlinkedin.com

It's a parody of LinkedIn -- it's actually very funny

But what's more interesting is that they implemented NEARLY ALL LinkedIn functionality in a TINY amount of Elixir code: github.com/cbh123/shlinked
Maybe we're just doing everything wrong in web development and should switch to more sensible languages that do much of the work for you
The big difference is that there's very little JavaScript -- instead page elements are rendered on the server as HTML but fetched as needed

This saves a TON of code
Read 5 tweets
Mar 18
On the left is GPT-3.5. On the right is GPT-4.

If you think the answer on the left indicates that GPT-3.5 does not have a world-model....

Then you have to agree that the answer on the right indicates GPT-4 does.
I completely made up this question btw, so I don't think it's in any training data.
It's pretty evident to me that we're no longer in "stochastic parrot" territory. GPT-4 is capable of genuinely reasoning about the world. It's pretty dumb sometimes, and makes odd mistakes. But it does seem to have some emergent simple world-model.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 18
People like to say GPT-4 isn’t intelligent because it doesn’t have a “world model.” What is a question I can ask it to prove it doesn’t have a world model?
Like I tried stuff like “I’m in New York, I fly a Cessna for three hours west, jump out with a parachute, and catch a freight train south, where am I ” and it follows along and has reasonable guesses
This is a specific question Gary Marcus cited as indicating there is no “world model.” BUT GPT-4 gets it right!!!
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17
Democrats: let’s have free school lunch!

Republicans: but some families are wealthy and can afford to pay!

Democrats: oh you’re right, let’s tax the wealthy families!

Republicans: oh bother
Seriously, Minnesota is one of the wealthiest states, without having any oil/gas or much tech or finance. Housing is relatively cheap and basic government services are overall pretty good. We can afford to do much more
we’ve pretty consistently had state budget surpluses, it is now over $9 billion per year
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17
Only one person ever has tasted plutonium. It got on his face during an experiment gone wrong at Los Alamos, he had his stomach pumped and his breath tested as slightly radioactive for the rest of his life. He also was forbidden from working in a lab again. But he died at 87.
He eventually did a physics PhD, had a family and started an interior landscape company that was extremely successful, and died of natural causes. All while having a few micrograms of plutonium in his body.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(