This week's @PepsMccrea evidence snacks was on idea of fuzzy feedback due to the nosiy relationship between teaching (the action) and learning (the impact).
This made me think about gratitude, and why specificity matters.
A thread on specific gratitude 🧵
Displaying and receiving gratitude can be a joyous process. A real fulfillment can be felt when showing thanks to others, and being on the receiving end of gratitude can be hugely motivational and transformational.
However, gratitude can become diluted and lose its impact.
How often do we say thanks, thank you etc.?
When we say this, does it lead to the benefits described above?
How can we ensure gratitude is not diluted?
Be specific with the gratitude you give.
When expressing gratitude, describe what the action was that you appreciated, explain why it was meaningful, and include the positive impact it had.
Express the gratitude as soon as possible after the action, but again, avoid doing this so often it becomes bland.
Here are some examples:
As a leader, try and encourage your team members to display gratitude to each other in the same way through modelling this behaviour.
We often have a tendency to talk about overselves when talking about the impact of gratitude, rather than focussing on others. @heidigrantphd discusses this here:
In summary, make gratitude specific and focussed on the impact people are having. Model these behaviours, and you'll see people around you doing the same very quickly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another great @PepsMccrea evidence snacks today, this time on trust.
There is so much to summarise when it comes to reading about trust. The best summary I've read comes from @teacherfeature2 Building Culture amzn.eu/d/dbtA2OW
'Trust is built on telling people the truth, not what they want to hear'
Quoting Sinek, then leaning into her craft expertise, Lekha reminds us that candour is kindness, and that being liked isn't the same as being trusted.
Referencing the work of Solomon and Flores, the relationship between trust and control is explored.
Lekha also reminds us that their are different types of trust, including blind trust, which can be described as foolish.
Been thinking hard about the role of collaboration in curriculum development and design.
Can't help feeling that when teachers don't work together on this, they are missing a trick. I've come across a few reasons why a collaborative approach is useful in some recent reading ...
The interplay between collaborative curriculum work and developing teachers can lead to innovation within the curriculum.
Teacher design teams (TDTs) can be used as a tool of school improvement. Through working together on curriculum development, they will themselves, develop and improve, leading to wider school improvement.