1/ Spent 2 hours trawling through Celsius filings to write this thread explaining in non-lawyer friendly terms what the winning Celsius bid entails.

TLDR: If your Celsius bag is more than $5000, you get smol distribution and become shareholder in mining / PE company.
2/ Worth noting that the eventual winning bid was from Farenheit which improved on the 'stalking horse' terms initially put together by NovaWulf in consultation with the debtors.

Those whose interests in this are related to their FTX bags can expect something similar...
3/ a 'baseline' structure with the opportunity for other parties to provide a "better" deal.

So what do creditors get under the terms of the winning bid? The headline point that keeps getting repeated is 'equity' - but its a bit more than that.
4/ Lets look at what Celsius currently has - (a) DeFi crypto assets, (b) loan portfolio, (c) PE & VC investments, (d) liquid crypto (about 500m) and (e) mining assets.

The plan proposes that all of these (except liquid crypto) will go into a newly formed company (NewCo).
5/ The headline point? 100% of the equity in the NewCo will go to creditors that are owed more than $5000 USD pro rata (subject to some management shares and fees we will discuss in more detail).

Those owed less than $5000 USD get 70c on the dollar on their claims and no equity.
6/ The liquid crypto (about 500m) will be distributed to creditors above $5000 USD after deducting, among others, (a) payouts to all convenience / custody claims, (b) the NewCo Capitalization Amount (150m), (c) Initial Litigation Funding Amount (TBD) and (d) senior claims.
7/ What the above broadly means is that the liquid assets of the company will be used to first pay off the custody, small account holders and senior claims, fees, up to 150m invested into the NewCo to kickstart operations and to fund litigation (more on this later).
8/ So honestly if you are a participating creditor (above $5000 USD), you shouldn't expect to see much returns in terms of a distribution after all of the deductions.

Important point to note - you give up your debt claim against Celsius under this plan.
9/ This means that in exchange for your current claim against Celsius, you get:

(a) A pro rata distribution of the liquid crypto that is left (prob very smol amount)
(b) A pro rata share of any monies they get from suing Mashinsky etc
(c) a pro rata share of NewCo equity.
10/ So if you are owed 10m and you get 1m from liquid crypto distribution and 500k from suing Mashinsky, the only way to recover the remaining 8.5m is via appreciation of your equity.

The NewCo no longer owes you that 8.5m as debt so you get wiped out if Celsius 2.0 fails.
11/ I am emphasizing this point because it is an easy mistake to make.

You are NOT getting an IOU/debt token and equity. You are getting an equity ONLY in NewCo and a share of the litigation proceeds (if any).
12/ So what does your shiny new equity interest entail? Well it represents a share in NewCo which now has mining assets, some DeFi assets / business, a loan portfolio and a bunch of PE/VC investments.

Not bad. And that equity will likely be liquid too.
13/ But nothing in life comes free and the new managers / new investors need to be paid too.

So here is a quick pop quiz - of management salaries, outstanding debt, equity, who gets paid first?

Salaries of course - and part of the winning bid stipulates that a...
14/ 35m per annum salary be paid to the management team (i.e. the Farenheit team). Fairly chunky amount, but not too bad.

The Farenheit team will be putting in 50m of their own money to buy shares when the plan is implemented and they don't have a preferential distribution.
15/ Their equity is also subject to a 2 year lock-up but note that there is a carveout allowing them to sell up to 30% of their equity after 1 year if Celsius equity trades at 150% of NAV (as at Effective Date) and another 30% at 200% of NAV (as at Effective Date).
16/ In other words, after 1 year, the Farenheit team has the option to dump on you if Celsius equity token increases in value - and the reference value is NAV at the 'Effective Date' (i.e. when the plan becomes effective) so would expect it to be fairly low.
17/ The Farenheit team also gets 5% equity vesting over 5 years and options to purchase up to 10% of the NewCo equity over a 5 year period.

The options are fairly priced (references market price and an index) so no risk of super low exercise price options creating oversupply.
18/ I would like to take this opportunity to state that 'equity token' is not a given.

The first choice is to have the equity listed "on a stock exchange (e.g., NASDAQ, Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX), NASDAQ Dubai)".

Only if that fails will they consider tokenizing.
19/ There are a lot of terms around the mining assets which leads me to think that the real value which Farenheit sees in Celsius are its mining assets.

Won't bore people here but in short, US Data Mining Group is gonna run the mining assets.
20/ So now that we have NewCo and liquid distributions out of the way, a quick note on the final pot of recovery - litigation proceeds.

These proceeds will come out of suing Mashinsky, Shlomi and others and pursuing clawbacks. It is worth noting...
21/ that the clawbacks are subject to a de minimis amount - withdrawals over 100k in the preference period will not be subject to clawback.

Would expect the FTX estate to do something similar and only pursue 'large' claims.
22/ Anyway so my thoughts on the plan?

It is ok - not great but not terrible, what you would expect a compromise to look like.

Would I rather just get 70c on the dollar as a creditor >$5000?

Probably.

Is that possible given the company's current state?

No.
23/ Crypto people (and retail investors generally) tend to overrate equity because of the potentially astronomic returns but getting equity in a bankrupt company is not the same as investing into a start-up.

There is a reason creditors generally dont like being equitised.
24/ But all in all - I can't say it is a terrible plan. Not great, but not terrible.

Yes, you essentially waive all your creditor claims against Celsius but the NewCo financing structure doesn't seem terribly onerous so maybe the equity will trade at a reasonable valuation.
25/ As always - I am a hentai anime penguin in a suit. This thread is for entertainment purposes only.

None of these constitute legal, financial, ethical or philosophical advice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with wassielawyer (哇西律师)

wassielawyer (哇西律师) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wassielawyer

May 23
1/ A lot of chatter about FTX 2.0 and the positions I see are either (a) people FUDing it or (b) bagholders thinking its going to be the next Binance.

Here are some (hopefully) balanced thoughts from a hentai penguin in a suit about the forms FTX 2.0 could take.
2/ To make clear, FTX 2.0 probably was always going to happen. One of the main priorities for an insolvency practitioner is to figure out whether the business, or parts of it can continue as a going concern.

In other words, selling the chairs and computers is a last resort.
3/ The problem is that people discussing FTX2.0 on CT often aren't even referring to the same thing.

For example - close your eyes and imagine a dog. The dog you see prob isn't the same as the one I am imagining.

So how can we have a sensible debate as to whether it is cute?
Read 21 tweets
Apr 6
1/ Probably almost a year late but this is a thread regarding Luna-UST which I have been wanting to do for a while now.

There is actually a FAR easier way of getting at TFL / Do Kwon / LFG's assets which none of the lawyers or claimants involved have tried yet.
2/ I initially put this off because I thought at some point one of the many claimants or law firms engaged might figure it out but given the fact that most lawsuits have ground to a halt a bit - I thought I'd throw this idea out into the public domain.
3/ Firstly, all of you guys are looking at it in the wrong way. All of the lawsuits I have seen have gone one of two routes.

The first route is to hyper-focus on LFG assets. Since these assets are visible, all the lawsuits in this class were focused on the 80m+ number.
Read 21 tweets
Mar 3
1/ Today, FTX released a preliminary analysis of the asset and liability position of FTX.com and FTX US.

So here is a quick analysis brought to you by a hentai anime penguin in a suit that woke up at sunrise to attend a poorly scheduled meeting.
2/ Headline figures are as follows - FTX.com has 11.2bn of customer liabilities v.s. 2.15bn of located assets in FTX's control, which means you are looking at a net shortfall of about 9bn.

The shortfall is attributed to a massive loan to Alameda, as expected.
3/ Of the located assets, only about 1/3 of it is in cash or liquid cryptocurrencies. The remaining 2/3 is in Sam coins including an astounding 1bn in MAPS.

The hole is a net position of about 9.3bn owed to related parties, mainly Alameda Research.
Read 21 tweets
Feb 4
1/ Why GTX could lead to another disaster.

I previously argued that GTX has some interesting ideas which could be taken into account in a potential restart or restructuring of FTX.

Now on the news that GTX has completed their raise, I'm here to drop some FUD.
2/ The ideas I encouraged the FTX Debtors, UCC and other ad hoc committees to draw from GTX were predicated on the assumption that we are operating within the Chapter 11 - i.e. restructuring FTX in some way.

GTX as an idea does not work well outside of the FTX bankruptcy.
3/ Because how the fuck do you trade the FTX claims on GTX unless GTX buys FTX out?

FTX claims are debt claims against the FTX estate, and we aren't even sure who has what claims against the FTX estate yet.

So how can GTX be the arbiter of what FTX claims are valid?
Read 21 tweets
Jan 31
1/ Further thoughts on on-chain RWA.

The idea is in principle ok - but execution requires an incredible Web3 + Legal + IRL Ops team which no project has right now.

Without this - its just a sexy narrative to pump a garbage token, raise funds or make people pay for your house.
2/ A lot of these ideas even come from the wrong starting point. People assume RWA + onchain = number go up.

But why would number go up? A RWA like a painting, luxury watch or real estate already has a market value in the real world.

There needs to be a reason for tokenising.
3/ I see this a lot with shitty on-chain RWA projects. The use cases (will look at real estate in this) revolve around ponzifying an IRL asset with NFTs and tokens with little to no care for the actual IRL asset itself.

The project team often cannot even manage the IRL asset.
Read 17 tweets
Jan 16
1/ This hentai penguin has too much on his plate so will procrastinate on real work by being probably the first to actually consider 'GTX' seriously.

Note this is based on the version of the deck I have seen and I am evaluating the concept and how it could work - not the team.
2/ Now when we are done choking on the fact that the proposed executive team are the disgraced 3AC founders - what is the fundamental proposal?

People have called it a 'claims trading platform' but it is more than that. It is effectively FTX with a new shitcoin; your FTX claims.
3/ Imagine you take your FTX claims (USD value) and it shows up on this exchange as a new coin - USDG (as they call it).

You can now do a USDG/USDC trade for say 1/0.15 and get out of your FTX claims - or you can hold onto your USDG as the value of it increases.
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(