This would perhaps be the least aesthetic market area street of Tehran in middle of a rain. Despite 40 years of sanctions, it moggs Chanakyapuri's roads where our capital have all the embassies.
Pajeetry can't be explained by economic numbers alone. Delhi States GDP per capita is nearly $7000. That's way wealthier than Tiblisi, Georgia for example. This is Dhagomi, one of the poorest neighbourhoods in Tiblisi vs Rajouri Garden (Middle to Upper Middle class colony).
Per capita income should be above 10,000 USD in Rajouri Garden, so the comparison was really not apt. A good middle class locality in Tiblisi would be Chughureti. Let's compare that with Rajouri Garden now:
I want to be kind to pajeets, let's compare a middle class locality of Georgia with an upper class one in Delhi. This is green park, not far from central Delhi, a good 3 bedroom would cost $20,000 a year! Obviously this demands european level incomes. Compare it with Chughureti:
Now let's go full upper class, 0.1% areas. Delhi's Jor (first two) Bagh vs Tiblisi Hill Residences(last two):
Pajeetry is a problem in culture and mindset. The republic was made on the ashes of 500+ native princely states, which represented Indian high culture. As a result, the state went 180 degrees opposite of whatever made Indian glorious, rich and aesthetic.
Without doubt, the Indian high culture is most elegant, most aesthetically pleasing, most philosophically sound, most rationally planned and certainly most spiritually rooted in the world.
This high culture is confronted by the Great Indian Dehato-socialist pajeetry, which is lowest of if vile filths in the world. It promotes sub saharan IQ, economics, and aesthetics while craving for Scandinavian wokeism, morality and taxes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Only Indo-Aryans and Eastern Iranics can really claim to be Aryan, reason, look at these genetic distances of various neolithic groups which form bulk of modern Indo-European people. Iran_n (also CHG) is closest to ANE. Meanwhile others are as good as AASI. I'll explain.
Very long ago, Western Eurasian hunter gathers were divided in groups. Natufian and ANF (Anatolian Neolithic farmers) are closely related groups spread across Anatolia and Levant. WHG existed in European peninsula. Iran_n and CHG in the region from Caucasus to Iranian Plateau.
ANE, or Ancient North Eurasian was the source of the Proto Indo European language, and the y-dna haplogroup R. 50%+ of European autosomal DNA is from WHG, which was as distinct from ANE as AASI originally. Here is the picture of a WHG person.
> Be Iran
> Constant foreign intervention for more than a century
> Weak Qajars nearly sell you out. Slim hope thanks to the pahlavis, but:
> Reza Shah got overthrown by the USSR and British. His son overthrew by Americans and French, Mullahs got installed
> 8 year war with Iraq… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Meanwhile Pajeet ji Ravi Kumar Yadav from Mumbai complains Iran got it easy bro, they have oil bro, who cares if it has been very had for them to export much of anything for decades and they have a population of 90+ million, hardly enough to subsidize with oil money.
here you go gorajeet, i made it easy for you. Nation State is a new concept, it is like asking where were the nuclear submarines in 1000 CE. There were none. India wasn't and may be still isn't a nation state, it was a civilization and is one.
There is a reason why Persians called occupied western Baluchistan "White India", rendered in greek as "Indikē Leukē". There is a reason why the region of Indian subcontinent was considered one unit. There is a reason why Hind was one unit for Persians and later Arabs.
Nation State is a post napoleonic concept. Before that we had tribal republics and kingdoms, both of them were what they literally sound, polities controlled by a landed gentry and a polity belonging to a king and his family. A civic state is a new innovation.
This one map disproves both the Aryan invasion theory, and the out of India theory. It is a map of ANE or Ancestral North Eurasian admixture of India. Indic populations have one of the highest, if not the highest percentages of ANE ancestry at scale
ANE is the original source of the y-DNA haplogroups P, Q and R. y-DNA traces the male lineage. Everything from R1a to R1b and R2 comes from the ANE cultures. Indian populations have up to 35% ANE ancestry which is on par with Sintashta culture itself (40-50%).
ANE were an isolated West Eurasian group which had at least 30 thousand year worth of genetic divergence from other West Asian groups, from Native European Hunter Gatherers to Indus_periphery. They were a war-like people who lived by hunting mammoths during the ice age.
People who do not know the difference between 4 crops and 4 crop-seasons will now teach history. Ironic. In pre-industrial age India and China had best economically viable geography. Not just we had nearly 4 crop seasons, but also ample arable land.
This agricultural abundance allowed population growth. Going by the simple laws of probability more people with imply more great people who did all those innovations in the past. The so called dindu nationalists severely downplaying the land they claim to represent, again ironic.
High ANE (Ancestral North Eurasian) ancestry Europeans other than the Indian subcontinent are concentrated in the European steppes, and colder areas of northern and eastern europe. Areas with small populations and historically bad agriculture. Ukraine had been the only exception.
Yes, the historic vedic religion was the religion of the chariot-ridding Rajanya warlords who conquered territories from their homeland in Northern Eurasia to Bengal. They slaughtered everything which came in their way with infinite zeal for expansion.
With nearly 4 crop seasons, and abundance of fertile soil + water, Indo-Aryans settled down. Upon settling down the age of philosophies came. There are thousands of philosophies who took birth here, from Upanishads to Buddhism, Jainism, Ajivka, and Charvakas. This had an effect:
Over time syncretism mixed and match everything, which contributed to the creation of the confused Indian 'Hindu' identity. We as a society failed to see Vedas were our religion and these new innovations were philosophies. Not making this distinction haunt us to this very day.