With #WhiteAustraliaParty trending as a charge against the pro-multicultural Liberal Party of 2023 for some reason, let’s take a look at what our Prime Ministers throughout history really thought about the White Australia Policy.
Edward Barton (Protectionist):
“The policy of this Government will be to bring about a white Australia… there is an interest of Australia, not only of labour, but one largely racial… It is Australia we have at heart.”
Alfred Deakin (Protectionist and later the original Liberal Party):
“A white Australia is not a surface, but it is a reasoned policy which goes down to the roots of national life, and by which the whole of our social, industrial, and political organisations is governed.”
Chris Watson (Labor):
“The racial aspect of the question, in my opinion, is the larger and more important one; but the industrial aspect also has to be considered.”
“They [migrants] shall be on a moral and physical level with us… and will be such as we can fraternise with.”
George Reid (Free Trade):
“I believed in making that act [1901 Immigration Restriction Act] speak honestly and straightforwardly the determination of the Australian people that we should have a white Australia.”
Andrew Fisher (Labor):
“the people of Australia… must feel somewhat annoyed, to say the least, at any departure from the principle [WAP] they have established.”
Julia Martinez on Fisher — “The federal Labor government under Fisher was a firm advocate of ‘White Australia’.”
Joseph Cook (Original Liberal Party):
“In the first place our objective is an Australia—white, free, federal.”
Billy Hughes (Labor and later Nationalist):
“We stand for the Empire; for a White Australia; for stable government by the duly elected representatives of the people. We set our faces resolutely against Government by secret juntas and forces outside Parliament.”
Stanley Bruce (Nationalist):
“It is necessary that we should determine what are the ideals towards which every Australian would desire to strive… being to secure our national safety, and to ensure the maintenance of our White Australia Policy…”
James Scullin (Labor):
“The first plank of Labor’s Fighting Platform is the cultivation of an Australian sentiment and the maintenance of a White Australia.
That has always been a plank of the Labor Platform,”
Joseph Lyons (United Australia Party):
Interior Minister Paterson on the Lyons Government’s support of the WAP — “…we are to preserve inviolate the White Australia policy,… to which we all subscribe.”
Robert Menzies (United Australia Party and later contemporary Liberal Party):
“We will continue to maintain Australia’s settled immigration policy, known as ‘The White Australia Policy’; well justified as it is on grounds of national homogeneity and economic standards.”
John Curtin (Labor):
“Our laws have proclaimed the standard of White Australia… We intend to keep it, because we know it to be desirable.”
Ben Chifley (Labor):
On his government’s support of the WAP — “The policy of the Australian Government in connection with this matter, which is generally in line with that pursued by past Australian governments, has been clearly expounded from time to time.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 DEBUNKING THE CIVIC NATIONALIST MYTH ABOUT WHITENESS IN AUSTRALIAN IDENTITY 🧵
Many colourblind civic nationalists attempt to argue that the ideal of a White Australia is not an intrinsic feature of Australian identity. This argument is meant to diminish the…
… role of race and ethnicity as the cornerstone of Australian nationality, and attempts to legitimise claims of historical continuity for a nationalism that is multiracial. However, a proper inquiry into Australian history shows that race was never considered merely incidental…
… nor was it to be considered a secondary aspect of Australian political society. Rather, it was its essence.
As far back as 1858, the racialist case (vs economic) for White Australia was fully developed — its ineffaceability made explicit by future NSW premier James Martin.
🇮🇱 THE JEWISH STAKE IN NEW DRACONIAN LAWS MEANT TO STOP ‘EXTREMISM’ IN AUS🇦🇺
The influence of the Jewish Zionist Lobby on this new law (which came into effect this week and could be used to target or entrap innocent White patriots) appears at every stage of its development.
As the BBC wrote, ADC Chairman Dvir Abramovich had been campaigning personally for 6 years to achieve the implementation of such laws in Australia. The ADC specifically says they want to advocate for “counter the defamation of the Jewish people and Israel.”
Despite the media reporting only on the ban of the swastika symbol and salute, the main purpose of the bill was to empower law enforcement to further encroach on the rights of Australian citizens. The salute was only inserted into the bill because the Liberals wanted it to be.
🚨5 YEARS PRISON FOR ACCESSING ‘VIOLENT EXTREMIST MATERIAL’ ONLINE (unless you’re a fed or journalist)🚨
The new Prohibited Hate Symbols and Other Measures amendment to Counter-Terrorism legislation has outlawed the mere access of so-called violent extremism material online.
This would seem to apply to everything from PDF books, the ordering of books online, and even the storage of memes that could be construed as promoting ‘violent extremist content’. The irony is that the only exceptions for such possession are for those engaged in…
… law enforcement activity and journalistic activity, or activity of a private individual assisting law enforcement. So, the law itself is designed to be abused by police and journalists collaborating together to entrap private citizens. This offence carries a 5yr sentence. RT!
🧵 AUSTRALIANS 🇦🇺 AS DESCRIBED BY A WRITER IN THE 1900s 🧵
(paintings by Percy Spence)
Writer Frank Fox said this about Australians:
“In the streets the city men's garb refuses to conform to British conventions; the whole male population almost is straw-hatted.
“… The women, on the other hand, are dressed more gaily and expensively than is usual in the streets of a British city. This is due to the fact that in almost every Australian city some stretch of street is looked upon as a social meeting-place, and women dress for…
“… the street as for a matinee. There is no stiffness of social manner. The traditions of the old pastoral days still colour the people's life, and the stranger is looked upon with friendliness rather than suspicion. The usual greeting to a man who is introduced for the…