UC Maxwell™ 𓃵 Profile picture
May 30 31 tweets 9 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
UPDATES AT THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION TRIBUNAL TODAY TUES. 30TH MAY 2023.

HEARING SESSION:

As at 7:40am, court doors are open and people gain entrance.

Notice on restrictions on phones and gadgets can still be seen within the court, but not yet enforced.

#LiveFromPEPT Image
UPDATE! UPDATE!! UPDATE!!!

We've just been told to go out of the court and submit our phones before entry.

The 'No Phones and Gadgets' will be enforced today by the court.

#LiveFromPEPT
A certain SAN (name withheld) was told to keep his phone outside before accessing the court. He simply looked, hissed & went in with his phone without being stopped. 😂😂😂

People are seated in court and carried out civil disobedience to the rule of keeping their phones outside. Image
It's 09:18am... And the Justices are seated.

Here We Go!

#LiveFromPEPT
The court is trying to determine issues as to allotment of time and breaks that will be taken day-to-day of the Petitions.

Wole SAN is informing the Court that He will like to bring to the tribunal's notice of a Supreme Court Judgment of Friday which resolved one of the issues
on the petition (Double Nomination). He says it is important that the court is aware.

Wahala, wahala, wahala...

#LiveFromPEPT
Anyways... The Court will start with the Petition of the APM-Allied People's Movement.

Here We Go!

#LiveFromPEPT
After attending the Swearing In Ceremony in Abia State Yesterday... Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed is in Court today.

I'll limit my updates on the APM case and only update you on very important issues until the other cases are called.

#LiveFromPEPT
The Counsel of the APM (Petitioners) have just prayed the court to adjourn the hearing of the petition to enable them apply to the Supreme Court for the Friday Judgment.

This was in response to the position of Wole (2R & 3R) reminding the court of the judgement which settled...
The issues of the Petitioners.

He requested for an adjournment till Friday 2nd June 2023.

#LiveFromPEPT
The Court have adjourned the Petition of the APM till Friday May 2, 2023 to enable parties obtain the Supreme Court Judgment SC/CV/501/2023 between PDP v. INEC & 2 ORS.

NEXT!

#LiveFromPEPT
THE PETITION OF PETER OBI, LABOUR PARTY V. INEC & 3 ORS. HAVE BEEN CALLED.

- Datti Baba-Ahmed is representing the Labour Party.
- Mrs. May for INEC (1R)
- Mr. Saturday for APC (4R)

Here We Go!

#LiveFromPEPT
- Dr. Livy SAN leads Petitioners Team
- AB Mahmoud SAN leads 1R Team
- W. Olanipekun leads 2R & 3R Team
- LO Fagbemi leads 4R Team

#LiveFromPEPT
Dr. Livy just informed the court that they have just one witness today in court.

#LiveFromPEPT
All other witnesses are told to leave the court... We are down to business.

First witness is in the witness dock and swears with the Holy Bible.

#LiveFromPEPT
JS Okutekpa will conduct the Examination in Chief on behalf of the Petitioners.

#LiveFromPEPT
Before the Examination in Chief, the Petitioners are moving before the court, all the documents which they will rely upon for their case.

#LiveFromPEPT
1st Document Tendered:
The evidence of Acceptance of Nomination by the 3rd Respondent Shettima.

#LiveFromPEPT
INEC raises observations about the tendering of documents as a process that should have been done during the Pre-Hearing. That they need time to review the documents before the tendering.

The court informs them that they can view the documents IN COURT as they are being tendered
Petitioners inform the court that there's no law that compels them to show the respondents the documents before coming to court. Moreover, INEC, the 1st respondents were the ones that certified the document, so why the need to see the documents before tendering them in court.
The Pet. further informs the court that the law only compels them to show them the list of documents, not the actual document and they have a right to tender those documents any time in court as far as it has been listed and pleaded in the Petitions.

#LiveFromPEPT
The Court will now take a recess for 10 minutes so that parties can resolve the issues.

It's getting heated, witness have not even been called yet.

#LiveFromPEPT
Peter OBI is in Court with his respected brother Datti.. Waiting for proceedings to resume.

#LiveFromPEPT Image
We're back!

The proceedings of the petition between PETER OBI, LP v. INEC & ORS. resumes.

There's a stopwatch in court to time all parties during the Examination of witnesses... It's going to be one hell of a debate in the 8-walled courtroom.

Here We Go!

#LiveFromPEPT
Court encourages Parties to file schedules of documents early enough so all parties can be aware.

The court noted vehemently that the stage of requesting time to inspect documents is past and cautioned INEC. That they should know their certification by a simple glance.
Counsel to the Petitioners appealed to the court that there may be instances where they may file their schedule later than expected due to the fact that they've not gotten all documents within hand.

We will now proceed to tendering of documents by the Petitioners.

#LiveFromPEPT
All 4 documents have been tendered by the Petitioners, 4 of which are INEC certified documents. All the respondents do not have any objections to the documents.

The court has admitted them as Exhibits PA1-4

(Make Senior Advocate no make Judge vex ooo, voices are high) 😀
First witness in the box identified as one LUNN & has identified his witness statement on oath which he deposed to. The witness is making an oral application to the court to amend Paragraph 10 of his witness statement on oath. He wants to amend the word 'February' to read 'July'
He claims there's a mistake there and wants it amended.

ALL RESPONDENTS DO NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO THE AMENDMENT.

The Amended Witness Statement on Oath have now been adopted.

#LiveFromPEPT
The witness also identifies some documents as documents obtained from the US District Court & wants it adopted as evidence for the Petitioners.

1ST RESPONDENTS DON'T OBJECT, however, 2,3,4 Respondents inform the court that they will reserve their objections till their final...
written address.

The Court has adopted them into Evidence.

Witness also identifies 4 documents as those obtained from INEC. And adopt them to be tendered in Court.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with UC Maxwell™ 𓃵

UC Maxwell™ 𓃵 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @UkomahM

May 27
Amina JSC of the Supreme Court in the PDP suit against Shettima held that the principles in Nwosu v APC (2019) cannot apply for 2 reasons:

1. That Nwosu was nominated by two parties
2. That Nwosu participated in two primaries but Shettima participated in one

I TOTALLY DISAGREE! Image
The provisions of S. 35, Electoral Act 2022 is in no different from S. 37, Electoral Act 2010 which applied to the Nwosu case.

ON THE FIRST REASON:
The law is clear that a CANDIDATE stands voided if he is nominated by:
a. More than one party
b. In more than one constituency... Image
It is clear by this provision that whether multiple nomination was done by multiple parties or done in multiple constituencies, such candidate stands voided and can never participate in an election.

Nwosu's case was in two parties, Shettima's case was in two constituencies...
Read 12 tweets
May 17
Court sat at about 9:10am.

Peter Obi and the National Women Leader have established presence in court as the Petitioners.

The court said it will not record names of anyone as representing anyone but will establish representation.

#LiveFromPEPT

Thread...
Only the Petitioners, 1st Respondent (INEC) and 4th Respondent (APC) are represented.

2nd (Bola) and 3rd (Shettima) Respondents are not represented in court.

The lawyers are now announcing appearances.

#LiveFromPEPT
Appearances are made by the lawyers in the order of Petitioner, 1st Respondent (INEC), 2nd, 3rd and 4th Respondents.

#LiveFromPEPT
Read 13 tweets
May 10
Let's review the Supreme Court judgment of Adeleke and Oyetola...

Recall I told you that I won't make comments until I have digested the Judgment, however, for now, I'll work with the media reports.

I want the public to pay attention, but this attention is free of cost... Image
@thecableng reported that "The court further said that NO LAW REQUIRES PRESIDING OFFICERS TO TRANSMIT THE NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS or accreditation of the polls TO THE DATABASE or backend server of INEC by BVAS."

Let's probe the court's views in line with the law.

Follow me. Image
S.60(5), Electoral Act-EA provides that "The PRESIDING OFFICER SHALL TRANSFER the results INCLUDING TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS (NAV) and the results of the ballot in a manner as prescribed by the Commission."

The law is unambiguous that the PO SHALL transfer Total NAV... Image
Read 11 tweets
May 9
My name is UC Maxwell, and my support for Peter Obi’s mandate remains firm. I am not interested in crumbs, access, or whatever. I simply want a better society. If you approve, RT. ✊

#SupportForPeterObi Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(