Tanks Encyclopedia Profile picture
May 30 18 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A retired T-80UD rusting away following the type's retirement from service in Russia (picture likely from the early 2010s)

The T-80UD is somewhat unique in relation to the current invasion of Ukraine (thread, 1/17) Image
An argument could easily be made that the vehicle is superior to the average tank of both Ukraine (T-64BV) and Russia (T-72B or early B3). However, despite a non-insignificant production run at Kharkiv in the late Soviet era (around 650 vehicles pre-91 often mentioned) (2/) Image
No T-80UD has been seen on either side as of the writing of this. The T-80UD is basically a modified T-80U that swaps out the gas turbine for the 6TD diesel, an evolution of the 5TD/5TDF of T-64s. 6TD was introduced in some Soviet-era modernized T-64s, and is also used by (3/) Image
more modern Ukrainian T-64BMs. T-80UD was created after Kharkiv locomotive plant was ordered to produce the T-80U, a design from the Leningrad Kirov plant. Kharkiv was the home of the diesel that powered the T-64s, and found it more suitable to produce it than turbine tanks (4/) Image
There are also a myriad of other changes in comparison to T-80U, such as new turret castings (which were produced at Azovstal in Mariupol) and small modifications in the fitting of equipment. T-80UD was designated as Object 478B (A was a simplified model) before adoption (5/) Image
(T-84s/Oplots created by post-collapse Ukraine have continued to use the 478 as their object number, and one could argue T-80UD in practice introduces a new family of tank mostly taking their design from T-80 but with powerplant from T-64 - pic is Obj 478DU w/ T-64 wheels) (6/) Image
After the USSR collapsed (T-80UDs were notably seen during the attempted August 1991 hardliner coup in Moscow), most T-80UDs found themselves on the territory of Russia, but the type was largely dependent on Kharkiv and associated facilities for its maintenance (7/) Image
Because of this, the type was quite quickly phased out of service, despite being arguably more modern than any other tanks in Russia outside of T-80Us and the recent T-90s. Many UDs were scrapped, some were employed on target ranges as recently as 2021. (8/) Image
On Russia's side, one element of T-80UD did make it to the invasion - A few T-80UE-1s, which are T-80BV hulls that were given turrets from T-80UDs. Their claim to fame was being part of the great T-80U bloodbath taken by the 4th Guards Tank Div in Sumy and Kharkiv oblasts (9/) Image
Very occasional sighting suggest a few UE-1s may still be in service in Russia - a far cry from the hundreds of UD, that despite their engines may still be dearly missed considering 1958 T-54Bs (and beyond them a great many T-62s) have now showed up on the Russian side (10/) Image
On the Ukrainian side, Kharkiv Locomotive Plant ended up in Ukraine, alongside seemingly parts for a number of unfinished or planned T-80UDs. The number of actual serviceable tank seems to have been a lot lower though. (11/) Image
In 1996, Ukraine signed a contract with Pakistan to sell them 320 T-80UDs - the largest T-80 and Ukrainian export sale ever. It is understood most of these were made from pre-existing parts and comprised almost all UDs left in Ukraine. (12/) Image
Most of these exported T-80UDs included small upgrades (Object 478BE), with allegedly some introducing the welded turret design also used by T-84 (Object 478BE-1). The last were finished in 2002, to Russian protest over the tanks being sold to an enemy of India (13/) Image
Since then, there has been very minimal, if any sightings of T-80UD in Ukraine. None have been seen lost in the war against Russia (unlike T-80BV, of which Oryx lists 40 Ukrainian losses as of now). A Soviet era Object 478 prototype survives as a monument in Kyiv. (14/) Image
However, unlike in Russia, the T-80UD still has an open and evolving legacy in Ukraine in the T-84/Oplot family. New Object 478 family tanks were first marketed as T-84 around 1995 (Object 478D/DUs). At its core, the first T-84 was a T-80UD with a welded turret and new FCS (15/) Image
The family has greatly evolved since then - receiving the name of "Oplot" around the turn of the century, with the lastest version, BM-Oplot, often ditching T-84 entirely to be known just as this. Its industrial designation still betrays its heritage (Object 478DU9-1) (16/) Image
With recent news that, one way or another, Ukraine is looking to procure more Oplot BMs, it appears that, despite Russian invasion and the struggles Ukraine phased to produce Oplots-Ts at a timely rate when the type was sold to Thailand, Object 478 may still have a future (END) Image
Aside I couldn't fit anywhere - while the majority of T-80UDs were made with Kontakt 5 ERA, it appears a few of the earliest examples had Kontakt 1, which gives their turret a different look more reminiscent of the T-64 and T-80BV. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tanks Encyclopedia

Tanks Encyclopedia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tanksenc

Oct 15, 2022
When it comes to one tank being used to portray another in cinema, one that I've always found to be very interesting are French M24 Chaffees that were used to portray Panthers in 1966 movie "Is Paris Burning" and subsequent movies. Image
These were surprisingly high effort, being given fake zimmerit, fake bun barrel with muzzle brake, modified mantlets, new sideskirt, fake exhausts, and even an MG42 stuck on top. ImageImageImageImage
Especially keeping in mind that, around the same point in time, the Hollywood standard could just be to paint a M47 in sand colour and give it a Balkenkreuz, despite much higher budgets. Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 28, 2022
tanks-encyclopedia.com/kv-4-object-22…

The KV-4 program can be regarded as one of the most unsuccessful and short-lived tank design ideas of the Soviet Union during the WW2 period.
This is especially true considering its expectations, the caliber of the engineers behind it, J. Y. Kotin and N. L. Dukhov, to name a few, and those who ordered it to begin with, including Stalin himself. Image
Many designs were proposed in what was essentially a drawing competition, some quite sensible, while some were less so. One rather forgettable design was that by M. I. Kreslavsky, who did not receive any awards for his design. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 22, 2022
The open conflict between Russia and Ukraine which started on February 24 has seen a number of uncommon vehicles, from prototypes or rare production vehicles to field conversions, used and even lost. This thread will attempt to list and classify some of them.
This thread will use photograph, many of whom made known to us by analysts such as @UAWeapons, @oryxspioenkop, @RALee85, @ELINTNews and others, as well as official announcements and photo evidence shared by both sides.
The conflict has seen both sides make exaggerated claims, some of which are false or unverifiable. This thread will only mention vehicles which have photographic evidence of use in the current conflict.
Read 73 tweets
Mar 21, 2022
With little attention paid to the idea of fighting another major European land war or another peer-military in the decades since the end of WW1, the British military had, for the most part, focussed along two lines of thought:

tanks-encyclopedia.com/tog-citadel/
a fast and light strike force emphasizing manoeuver and an infantry-dominated force supported by tanks. It was not until 1939, on the eve of war with Germany, that the idea that the Army might need special tanks...
...to avoid the onset of static warfare or break a deadlock over a heavily defended area might be needed. It was not until Sir Albert Stern, a man with a great deal of experience of exactly those sorts of problems suggested such a tank in June 1938...
Read 5 tweets
Mar 20, 2022
The United States entered WW1 late and came without any tanks. They finished the war with none of their own tanks seeing combat either, having to rely on the French and British for this new weapon of war.

tanks-encyclopedia.com/ford-3-ton-spe…
The closest they came in 1918 was the diminutive Ford 3-ton tank, a two man turretless box with barely enough armor to keep out enemy bullets and a pale shade of the sort of tank they would need. Image
The French hated it, the Army hated it, the only love it got was from Ford Motor Company looking for a juicy contract and the Ordnance Board eager to keep costs in check. Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 6, 2021
Following the disintegration of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in the early 90s, the new Federal Republic of Yugoslavia inherited a relatively huge stock of various armament, equipment and weapons.

tanks-encyclopedia.com/samohodna-haub…
One of these was the Soviet 122 mm D-30 and the domestically modified D-30J (with improved ammunition) howitzer.
As the Serbian Army lacked a more modern self-propelled artillery (beside the aging 2S1 Gvozdika), in 2004, an attempt was made to develop such a vehicle using a military truck chassis and arming it with a 122 mm D-30J gun.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(