- Awa Kalu SAN leads the Petitioners Team
- AB Mahmoud leads the 1st Respondent Team
- Wole Olanipekun leads the 2nd & 3rd Respondent Team
- LO Fagbemi leads the 4tg Respondents Team
The lead Justice just reprimanded people for coming in with phones and the fact that, after disobeying the rules against phones, they don't put their phones on silent.
He Expressed concerns that even yesterday there were sounds from phones and he say images in the social media.
Court workers moved towards the area pointed by the judge, and they possibly cautioned the people there... Proceedings continue.
Awa Kalu for the Petitioners just informed the court that two of their key star witnesses are not in court due to illness and he prays for the adjournment of the suit.
AB Mahmoud for the 1st Respondents expressed dismay that they were not given heads-up and due to the circumstances, they are not objecting to the application for adjournment.
He further appeals to the court that this will be counted as one of their days to prove their case.
The court affirms that this will count and no additional days to their time to prove their case.
Wole & Fagbemi SAN do not also object to the application for adjournment.
The court, in furtherance, has adjourned the matter till tomorrow Thurs. June 1, 2023 at 9am
A certain SAN (name withheld) was told to keep his phone outside before accessing the court. He simply looked, hissed & went in with his phone without being stopped. 😂😂😂
People are seated in court and carried out civil disobedience to the rule of keeping their phones outside.
Amina JSC of the Supreme Court in the PDP suit against Shettima held that the principles in Nwosu v APC (2019) cannot apply for 2 reasons:
1. That Nwosu was nominated by two parties 2. That Nwosu participated in two primaries but Shettima participated in one
I TOTALLY DISAGREE!
The provisions of S. 35, Electoral Act 2022 is in no different from S. 37, Electoral Act 2010 which applied to the Nwosu case.
ON THE FIRST REASON:
The law is clear that a CANDIDATE stands voided if he is nominated by:
a. More than one party
b. In more than one constituency...
It is clear by this provision that whether multiple nomination was done by multiple parties or done in multiple constituencies, such candidate stands voided and can never participate in an election.
Nwosu's case was in two parties, Shettima's case was in two constituencies...
Let's review the Supreme Court judgment of Adeleke and Oyetola...
Recall I told you that I won't make comments until I have digested the Judgment, however, for now, I'll work with the media reports.
I want the public to pay attention, but this attention is free of cost...
@thecableng reported that "The court further said that NO LAW REQUIRES PRESIDING OFFICERS TO TRANSMIT THE NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS or accreditation of the polls TO THE DATABASE or backend server of INEC by BVAS."
Let's probe the court's views in line with the law.
Follow me.
S.60(5), Electoral Act-EA provides that "The PRESIDING OFFICER SHALL TRANSFER the results INCLUDING TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS (NAV) and the results of the ballot in a manner as prescribed by the Commission."
The law is unambiguous that the PO SHALL transfer Total NAV...
My name is UC Maxwell, and my support for Peter Obi’s mandate remains firm. I am not interested in crumbs, access, or whatever. I simply want a better society. If you approve, RT. ✊