Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
@csranga
Jun 1, 2023 • 10 tweets • 6 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
The picture of Shri Rama Seetadevi and Lakshmana represents Rama Rajya pious purpose in our Constitutional Rama Rajya protected in Shri Rama Deity Rights & #SengolAtNewParliament reminds of the Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya guarantee pledge to Parliament so it is not infringed Image
#SengolAtNewParliament reminds of the Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya guarantee pledge to Parliament which was referred to in Kesavananda Bharati to limit the amendment power of Parliament under Art 368
swarajyamag.com/blogs/why-rama…
#SengolAtNewParliament will remind the Parliament of the Constitutional Rama Rajya basic structure of our Constitution that it cannot infringe while exercising constituent power to amend Constitution u Art 368 or power to make laws under the Constitution ImageImage
#SengolAtNewParliament will enable communication to SC that what Parliament with superior constituent power to amend cannot do u Art 368 the SC with lower interpretative power cannot do u Art 141 read with Art 147 the same Constitutional Rama Rajya basic structure applies to SC Image
Kanchi Paramacharya who inserted Art 26 worded by Dr Ambedkar which today protects Rama Rajya pious purpose in Shri Rama Raja Orchha Deity Rights also instrumental in reinstating #SengolAtNewParliament by explaining the significance

Matha gave Sengol which rep Rama Rajya pious purpose in Constituent Assembly Pledged guarantee, Matha inserted Art 26 which protects this guarantee in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights, Matha in Kesavanda Bharati protected it from being amended & Matha protected from SC interpretation Image
"The Adheeanam souvenir is dated before 26.1.1950. Any further proof needed?" asked Shri @sgurumurthy avrgl ...for people with devotion not needed

The #SengolAtNewParliament has come at the right moment when we are working to get SC interpretation u Art 147 aligned with resolution of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute through devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community
Only #SengolAtNewParliament without aligning the interpretation of our Constitutional Rama Rajya by SC with the Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents will be incomplete and both are part of pious purpose of Kanchi Paramacharya and we hope with divine grace to succeed Image
The Rama Rajya pious purpose for protection of which our ancestors both Kings and people of Bharat sacrificed continues to live in Shri Rama Raja Orchha Deity Legal personality Deity Rights u Art 26 read with Art 147, Art 363 and Art 372 and #SengolAtNewParliament will remind Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Apr 16, 2024
In👇thread we explain how April 18th 2019 Sabarimala genuine promise blocked by officials 90% fulfilled by Shri Rama Om Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏 Himself...the defined promise for devout politicians for rest 10% work is same as Art 84(A) Constitutional Oath

Image
Unfulfilled 10% Sabarimala promise is spirit of above Art 84 (A) Oath for all devout politicians across political spectrum who belong to Shri Rama Parivar Art 26 धार्मिक सम्प्रदाय (Hindi version of Constitution) Ramayana defn "राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
"If elected by grace of Shri Rama I will preserve protect and defend Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma definition of Constitutional Morality (Dharma) and ensure Sabarimala is reheard and correct Hon'ble SC Judges definition"Image
It is only through true faith and allegiance to Constitutional Morality (Dharma) definition of Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma as against wrong definition in SC ZERO Deity Rights judgement that Sovereignty and Integrity of Bharat can be secured
Read 5 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Jan 12, 2024
We have always wondered what is the significance of July 18th in the draft notification to resolve Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute...
Indian Independence Act came into force on July 18th 1947 and it is now clear the SC violated legal limit


Image
Eka Shila Shri Chilkur Balaji SreeDevi Bhoomi Devi Swamyambhu Deity represents the natural Rama Rajya Sovereignty of Dharma right of this ancient sacred land worshipped in the form of Bhoomi Devi Deity and recognized as 👆 legal limit to Constituent Power of law making
Shri Thanthri Padmanabha Swamy temple explains the connection between Thrippadidanam and above legal limit to Constituent power of law making
Read 10 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Jan 4, 2024
Post Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathishta
Shri Ramlala Sarkar Art 26 & Art 363 Deity rights legal limit to Constituent Power of law making protects
Sabarimala Deity Right to be Worshipped inclusive of Devotees' Group Right to perform duty of worship & please Deity
Image
Image
HH Saantananda Maharshi Swamiji historic letter connects April 18th 2019 Sabarimala promise of Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji and Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathisha which fulfills it by grace of Guru even though wrong official opinion blocked it.


Image
Image
How Shri Rama Raja Deity of Orchha revealed Himself as Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b) when historic Digvijay yatra of Swamiji referred to in the above letter which started from Ayodhya turned back towards Ayodhya

Read 9 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Jul 20, 2023
Bharat : India 2.0 Art 26 interpretation (we hope to get SC to follow through Order 27A Rule 1) that protects Rama Rajya natural right of Bhumi Devi has been secured through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal (SC) community to which Milind Makwana belongs
americankahani.com/perspectives/i…
"Our neighbors included a priest& Vedic astrologer. While both were members of what some would deem India’s “upper” or “dominant” castes, we were all in same socio-economic boat We didn’t think of them as superior nor did they think of us as inferior" Thank you for speaking truth twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
We are proud of devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community without which Bharat would have lost Art 26 Rama Rajya protected in Deity Rights and we hope the Govt will respond to our request to honor Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community through Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President Image
Read 6 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Jun 4, 2023
Having installed Sengol in Parliament let us work to make it erect for well-being of our Nation by correcting the wrong Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person u Part III which is in violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents
Image
"Shri Parameshwarji Eklingji Maharaj is the Sovereign of Mewar, and Shriji as His sole representative shall exercise on His behalf all rights, authority & jurisdiction." From Mewar Constitution
Sovereignty of Dharma basic structure of Bharat Constitution
ImageImage
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" Dr Radhakrishnan defining Bharat's Objectives resolution when we comp with Pakistan 👆 Image
Read 6 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Jun 4, 2023
Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity Koorma Form July 18th SC Judgement quotation part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler" ImageImageImageImage
The #SengolAtParliament reminds us of the practical truth of above statement from the story of Kannagi
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref ImageImage
Sengol in Parliament does bend when SC violates dharma by infringing on Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights in our Constitutional Rama Rajya and when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute arises duty of Hon'ble President & Hon'ble MPs to correct
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(