This paper making the rounds at the moment claims that "excess deaths started in Mar 2021 in GER and is unlikely to come from covid but matches vaccines"
It is rigged with issues which basically invalidate its claim
That covid is the by far main driver is also amply supported by the death data by cause of death which shows clearly that the spikes in deaths correspond to covid and are most likely to be underreported covid deaths
A further issue is that, as I showed for instance here last year, there is no visible pattern of excess deaths by age bracket which matches that of the vaccination campaigns
So, essentially, this study is based on erroneous assumptions on
- the temporal pattern of expected deaths
- the size of covid deaths in Germany
Once corrected for this, its conclusion on temporal association with vaccines AND lack of association with covid both fall apart
5/
This does not mean there are no vax deaths: There are, Destatis reports 243 so far. This could well be an undercounting (just as with covid because novel)
But there is no evidence, on the contrary, that the figure is massive as implied by the paper
Scotland has been reporting continues excess deaths (and this beyond covid) since November, even after corrections for mortality and population trend
However, the data by registration date is a bit misleading and a look at data by occurrence provides better insights ⤵️
Scotland provides data by occurrence by age on a monthly basis which allows one to make a proper assessement against expected deaths from population and mortality trends
And what comes through is that there are TWO periods of excess: "Xmas 22" and "Mar-Apr 23"
1/
Not only does Scotland provide monthly data by occurrence, it also provides it by leading cause
And it is pretty clear to see that there was a spike of respiratory and covid in Mar-Apr 2023 (which, as so often, also pushes up other death categories: heart, Alzheimer, etc.)
In particular, the impact of an "R0=2.5 / IFR >>0.5%" virus is such that no shielding mecanisms was deemed sufficiently secure to let circulation run high without taking uncalculated risks on the death toll
Also Sweden started to look at much firmer circulation reduction in Nov 2020, when the second wave hit and it was clear to its governments that IFR was around 0.6% and not 0.1% when defining its approach during the Spring 2020 wave
Vaccine harm deserves better than the deplorable show that vaccine sceptics are offering so here an update of fatality from Germany (up to April 2022):
The death rate due to covid vaccination was at roughly 1.8 deaths per million doses administrated in early 2022
Quick add ons to forecome obvious questions
/ No need to remind me that, just as with long covid, fatality is not everything (I know): I could not find hospitalizations or sequels data
/ Unfortunately, the German monthly death data by cause is not split by age
I just realize that in fact, Germany seems to have experienced a 4x higher death rate due to covid 19 vaccine than England up to April 2022
While Dr. Gupta's claim that new Danish data vindicated her low estimation of IFR in Mar '20 is incorrect, I still wondered how this estimate came about
This interview provides answers and highlights once more IFR's key role in a pandemic response ⤵️
From the interview, it is clear that Dr. Gupta’s low IFR estimate back in 2020 came from a set of considerations which reinforced each other
1) Covid-19 is a SARS virus and the world had been exposed to SARS before
-> Some immunity was there possible / likely
1/N
2) Covid showed the classic bell-shaped curve in China and in Italy which one expects from models when a virus comes and goes away
-> It is therefore possible that the going away was the result of reaching high levels of infections (60%? 70%?)
2/N
Interesting data came out today from Denmark, where @SSI_dk released cumulative covid deaths "for covid" (according to death register) by age bracket under a FOIR
How does this compare with Sweden? Well it is 3 times lower ... almost across the age board