I'm hearing anecdotally that a number of progressive mainline churches are seeing a post-pandemic steady influx of ex-evangelicals looking for new spiritual homes.
This doesn't mean that all ex-evangelicals are making this shift, but it suggests that at least some are.
In the 1990s and early aughts, the progressive mainline attracted mostly disaffected Catholics - a trend that strengthened congregations & attendance.
That the next disaffiliation wave might come from disgruntled & deconstructing evangelicals isn't surprising.
Mainline types: Don't expect this is a trend where folks will knock down your doors. You're going to have to prove yourselves trustworthy, open, loving - and you'll need to overcome years of stereotypes these folks learned in evangelicalism - you'll need to earn their respect.
One of your best resources will be the ex-evangelicals already in your congregations - those who grew up in evangelicalism in the 70s, 80s & who left a while ago.
They'll understand. They'll be great mentors to younger ex-evangelicals. It will be tender and fraught and hard.
This will be much, much harder than when all the Catholics suddenly showed up. Because there's more misunderstanding & animosity between evangelical & mainline Protestants.
But it could also be the sort of healing American Protestantism has needed for decades.
Younger ex-evangelicals grew up in a far narrower, far more intellectually reactive, and right-wing political environment than many of us did in mid-late 20th cent. Purity culture, CCM, abortion politics - a different ballgame than decades earlier.
The multi-generational nature of ex-evangelicalism (something that most scholars haven't begun to venture into) could be contentious and create a lot of tension if not handled with genuine care and deep listening.
There will be generationally different theological and spiritual needs because of the different backgrounds of ex-evangelicals (depending on when they left and what was going on in evangelicalism at the time).
No "when I was your age" stuff, please. That will not help.
Creating deep cultures of storytelling -- "journey telling" -- in congregations will be a good starting place. I'm a BIG believer in the power of spiritual memoir to heal rifts and heal our own hearts.
And, again, mainline types: Dump the magical thinking. Nobody's going to save your church (or your denomination) unless you put in the hard work of listening, learning, and authentically caring about the lives and hurts and hopes of the people who wend their way to your community
FYI: ex-evangelicals aren't coming to your church because they want it to be like what they left - they might come because they are hoping, with all their hearts, there's a different way of being Christian.
One that isn't mean.
And that isn't in the news every other week about hypocrisy and scandal.
Love God. Love your neighbor. Love the messy, beautiful diversity around you. Love the wounded world.
Practice joy and justice. Trust. Tell the stories of faith over and over and over again. Create, imagine, envision.
Be your most beautiful, welcoming selves.
Don't be fake.
If you hang out a rainbow flag or an "Everyone is Welcome" sign, do it for real. Make sure no one who comes feels like a stewardship target. Welcome them as pilgrims - brave people (do you know how much COURAGE it takes to go to church these days?) looking for God, hope, love.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK. I just told a guy in my local Starbucks/Safeway to f**k off.
And I can promise you in the next hour everybody in Alexandria will know.
I didn't know him. He was with a casual friend of mine, a rather nice woman whom I know from an Episcopal church in town.
She asked me what I was working on.
I told her that I was doing a new book on the spirituality of public space -- and how we can reclaim the empty places where statues have been taken down with different sorts of stories and figures to move us toward a better America.
I'm in near despair that the critical narratives of white Xian nationalism (which is primarily a problem of white evangelicalism) are largely being controlled by writers & scholars who are themselves still evangelicals.
Much of the anti-WCN project seems vaguely apologetic.
No Jews on this panel talking about white Christian nationalism? No liberal Protestants w/o the conservative theological presuppositions of evangelicalism? Someone who is actually NOT religious? These alternative narratives have intellectual tools to speak to analysis of WCN.
I realize that part of the problem is that Anthea Butler (who is a Catholic) isn't there today. But honestly, white evangelicals are mostly controlling the critique of the problem that their own theology has largely created.
Watching the roll-out of PRRI's Xian Nationalism survey. They just blew the "Xian Nationalists don't attend church" myth out of the water.
Xian Nationalists are more likely to be regular churchgoers (overwhelmingly white evangelical congregations).
Also, it isn't a problem of "catechesis" as @Peter_Wehner said -- it is clearly a problem of theology learned in seminary and taught from the pulpit of these churches. It is a deep, profound issue of worldview & biblical interpretation from leaders thru the entire system.
@Peter_Wehner WCN is a purposeful set of beliefs and practices promoted by intellectual and theological leaders for specific political ends and power. Their catechesis is EXACTLY as intended, EXACTLY as they learned and embraced in seminary and institutions.
2. The imbalance between continued Christian political dominance and demographic diversity will cause more rifts and religious hostility in American society.