If you’re an engineer and are looking for a major time commitment of a hobby, you can probably get a used 8020A up and running in half a year using just eBay. 1/n
You could set up a pair of machines and do some statistical analysis to make sure you’re confident in the results. If someone from #8020Agang is in your area, it’s a mad scientist meetup! 2/n
The only part you can’t get on eBay are probe installers, which I make for free for people who have already gotten an antique machine working. They’re pretty simple to make with ring magnets but I’m picky about tools. 3/n
It’s called #8020Agang because at the moment, 8020A is the “cheapest”, most practical model needed for an engineer or science-inclined person to start teasing out what’s happening with filtered air - whether the air is in a mask, school, car, hospital, factory, wildfire etc. 4/n
People are scared away by old timers bringing up pricetags like “$30,000 per machine”. Someone got a good chunk of a kit for $50. I’d say that for someone who is reasonably well-read, there’s an 80% chance that a $1000 kit total can useable readings. 5/6
The people that brag about spending tens of thousands on single machines usually don’t give out machines to measure air in their communities or to check manufacturer claims about devices that aren’t related to OSHA. Almost every room on Earth is untested.
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Things you can fit test (or at least particle count) that aren’t masks, paprs, or hepas:
Your own car’s cabin filter. Mine hasn’t been replaced in 5 years. Outside air was 3K particles / cm3 at the time.
Curious to see what happens when I finally change it.
You can measure the particle count in a hospital room (~5K here).
I’m not sure people understand how unregulated this space is. The mask on the bottom is a vertical bifold with bread twist tie nosewire and happens to be a legit N95. Its typical protection(hmff) is 30 times worse than the *worst series of another respirator. This is still legal.
That wasn’t even a cherry-picked example. There’s no bottom to this. I can’t think of another example of types of products where you get this much variation.
ChatGPT has a long way to go before it can pack this much wrongness into one tweet.
Unpacking the multiple layers of wrong assumptions:
Layer 1:
An implicit misunderstanding of how electret filters work - thinking that they’re like sieves rather than the overlapped sticky spiderwebs that they actually are.
Layer 2:
You need to be so out-of-touch with the literature as to not realize which particle sizes even carry any SARS-CoV-2 genomes at all.
1863+, small quantities
Source #3. Stethoscoop (Thank you @Skywriter37)
Slowish, expensive shipping to the US(10 days), and my package was looted(although this was probably random and has nothing to do with the company).