Mr. Saturday is in court already, even though it's a Friday. Man is looking too good to be representing the Respondent.
Anyways, I'm in court too, with my dear elder brother @realevabest, please follow him. I want to appear as Amicus Curiae today 😏😏 But I forgot my wig & gown.
One of the PO Lawyers, Emeka SAN, having conversations with Chief Oseloka @OselokaHObaze before proceedings resume today.
The court have decided to take the APM Petition first due to an observation that they may still adjourn today on the basis that they have not obtained the Supreme Court Judgment in the PDP-Shettima Case.
Recall that they adjourned in order to obtain the judgment.
My Lord, who hadn't seen Mr. Saturday in the Court, asked if Mr. Saturday will be in court tomorrow Saturday
Mr. Saturday chuckled, rose, bowed to the court and sat in style. Everyone laughs except me of course, I don dey hungry already, like sey I farm for dream.
Meanwhile, as Counsels for APM & Respondents announce appearance, Datti walks into court in his usual Gold Kaftan & high rising Hula (Cap native to northern Nigeria).
I don't envy these Justices... Remember that all the documents Obidients are celebrating will be read by them.
Counsel of the APM informs the court that they have not been able to obtain a copy of the judgment from the court, which was the reason for the adjournment on Tuesday.
They further applied for an adjournment so that they can obtain the judgment.
He further appealed that, subject to the convenience of the court, all parties in the petition have agreed to come back next week Friday, June 9, 2023.
Other parties did not object, hence, the court adjourned till Fri. 9 for the continuation of hearing.
COUNSELS:
- Dr Livy Uzoukwu SAN leads the Petitioners Team
Aside: The court laughs when Vincent Otaokpukpu ESQ. was mentioned and asked whether he was kept close to Tinubu's legal team, to crush their bones if they misbehave 😂😂😂
- Dr Kemi Pinhero SAN leads the 1st Respondent Team
- Chief Akin Olujimi SAN leads the 2nd and 3rd Respondents Team
- LO Fagbemi SAN leads the 4th Respondent Team
He informs the court that they are ready to continue with further tendering of documents. That they have filed a schedule comprising the documents they intend to tender this morning.
Dr Livy defer proceedings to Peter Afuba SAN to conduct.
Peter SAN:
Before they commence with the states for today, they want to complete some LGAs in some states they couldn't complete yesterday which are Rivers State and Niger State.
He asserts that it is contained in their schedule.
1st Respondents:
They object to the admissibility and their arguments were taken on 20th of May, that issues were not joined on these LGAs and they will be advancing their grounds at the address.
They will now proceed to Edo State. They will tender INEC certified true copies of Forms EC8As in respect of all 18 LGAs in Edo State. They are...
1. Esan Central 2. Ovia South-West 3. Uhunmwode 4. Esan North-East 5. Akoko-Edo 6. Ikpoba-Okha
...
7. Esan South-East 8. Egor 9. Etsako Central 10. Etsako East 11. Ovia North-East 12. Owan West 13. Oredo 14. Igueben 15. Etsako West 16. Orhionmwon 17. Owan East 18. Esan West
The court said we should not blame Peter SAN if he cannot mention Oshodi very well... Man is murdering names here 😂 11. Alimosho 12. Eti-Osa 13. Shomolu
...
They object to the admissibility of all the documents that the Petitioners are labouring to tender in respect of all the LGAs of Lagos State and shall advance their reasons which will show the Petitioners have laboured in vain.
I'll be leaving the court after it's ruling, business calls.
I apologize for any inconveniences this may cause all of you who stick to this account to get legitimate information from the court. I need to make money too 😃
- Awa Kalu SAN leads the Petitioners Team
- AB Mahmoud leads the 1st Respondent Team
- Wole Olanipekun leads the 2nd & 3rd Respondent Team
- LO Fagbemi leads the 4tg Respondents Team
A certain SAN (name withheld) was told to keep his phone outside before accessing the court. He simply looked, hissed & went in with his phone without being stopped. 😂😂😂
People are seated in court and carried out civil disobedience to the rule of keeping their phones outside.
Amina JSC of the Supreme Court in the PDP suit against Shettima held that the principles in Nwosu v APC (2019) cannot apply for 2 reasons:
1. That Nwosu was nominated by two parties 2. That Nwosu participated in two primaries but Shettima participated in one
I TOTALLY DISAGREE!
The provisions of S. 35, Electoral Act 2022 is in no different from S. 37, Electoral Act 2010 which applied to the Nwosu case.
ON THE FIRST REASON:
The law is clear that a CANDIDATE stands voided if he is nominated by:
a. More than one party
b. In more than one constituency...
It is clear by this provision that whether multiple nomination was done by multiple parties or done in multiple constituencies, such candidate stands voided and can never participate in an election.
Nwosu's case was in two parties, Shettima's case was in two constituencies...
Let's review the Supreme Court judgment of Adeleke and Oyetola...
Recall I told you that I won't make comments until I have digested the Judgment, however, for now, I'll work with the media reports.
I want the public to pay attention, but this attention is free of cost...
@thecableng reported that "The court further said that NO LAW REQUIRES PRESIDING OFFICERS TO TRANSMIT THE NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS or accreditation of the polls TO THE DATABASE or backend server of INEC by BVAS."
Let's probe the court's views in line with the law.
Follow me.
S.60(5), Electoral Act-EA provides that "The PRESIDING OFFICER SHALL TRANSFER the results INCLUDING TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCREDITED VOTERS (NAV) and the results of the ballot in a manner as prescribed by the Commission."
The law is unambiguous that the PO SHALL transfer Total NAV...