Read on Twitter
Well, if the president says it's the province's fault and we're doing things in a reasonable way, who is a higher ed journalist to question it?
I'm tired of these articles that are basically "a couple of angry faculty say, but the president clarifies..."
theglobeandmail.com/gift/6107e8e18…
I'm tired of these articles that are basically "a couple of angry faculty say, but the president clarifies..."
theglobeandmail.com/gift/6107e8e18…
No one said our finances were at a Laurentian level. What we actually said, and still say, is that many of the same warning signs apply under this @uofg administration as highlighted in the Auditor Geberal's report on Laurentian.
#SaveUofG
#SaveUofG
https://twitter.com/TRyanGregory/status/1634935111128064000?t=kMUxoA5cNPF2woyFOuefEA&s=19
“My job as president is to make sure that we are sustainable this year, next year, in five years and in 20 years,” Dr. Yates said.
We also had low international enrollment when she became Provost in 2015. Every university has an enrollment corridor and tuition freezes.
We also had low international enrollment when she became Provost in 2015. Every university has an enrollment corridor and tuition freezes.
So, either this administration failed to make us sustainable when we had surplus (again, departments were being directed to spend this down by the BoG and admin), or they are making drastic and damaging moves as a reaction to the impact of a unique event, namely the pandemic.
And it's less about the budget and much more about the destruction of collegial governance, morale, and relationships. It's about the gaslighting and inability to ever admit any mistake. It's the lack of transparency and real consultation. It's the broken trust.
If the current @uofg administration couldn't make us sustainable with the huge surplus they inherited, why would anyone think they can do it now?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
