The Other Chris Profile picture
Jun 2, 2023 26 tweets 11 min read Read on X
⚙️ MLRS and the UK
---
The Future Artillery Conference this week released new information on the UK's rocket artillery programmes as well as provided more information we can intuit from.

An M270, HIMARS and PULS thread 🧵
#artillery #M270 #PrSM #LPS Image
⚙️ As well as 155mm and 105mm artillery replacement programmes, both considered Close Support Fires, the UK has three funded Deep Fires programmes originating in work for Deep Fires Rocket System, Land Precision Strike and the Weapons Sector Research Framework. Image
⚙️ The first area delivering is re-engineering existing UK M270B1 chassis in three ways to "zero-hour" the fleet life and enable integration of future munitions.

🔴 Overhaul of all automotives
🔵 Entirely new, larger cab
🟢 Overhaul of launch system with new FCS Image
⚙️ This results in the M270A2 (right). The UK is increasing its numbers of M270's to 71 by following the US and topping up conversions from M270A0 vehicles in storage.

That's right, the UK is upping GMLRS to 71 and the good news is work is on track (!), on time and on budget. Image
⚙️ What we can intuit from this news is that the proposal of Lockheed Martin to introduce this work at their Ampthill UK facility hasn't been taken up.

This is a shame. Clearly WCSP cancellation has damaged LMUK's facilities and skills.

shephardmedia.com/news/landwarfa…
⚙️ This is a missed opportunity to repair damage to UK defence industry and to create a European M270/HIMARS hub. Italy, Spain and Greece had all expressed a preference for a European loc for upgrades, the UK being the most likely place outside of the US to have "full access". Image
⚙️ It is also no secret that the UK is in discussions to expand its MLRS fleet beyond 71 x M270A2. The most likely candidate being HIMARS.

If LMUK are not recapitalising M270A2, that means we can intuit the UK are talking to the US about purchasing under the FMS system. Image
⚙️ A wheeled MLRS system is ideal for the Army's Expeditionary / First Battle doctrine. Lockheed Martin are also looking at squeezing two M270 pods onto an FMTV and Rheinmetall are looking at putting the HIMARS frame (unclear if one or two pods) and FCS onto a MAN truck. Image
⚙️ No matter which MLRS you go for, however, it's the missiles that are the effect and quite simply M270/HIMARS are a closed architecture. No non-US missiles will be considered, and the US has other platforms for other missiles. Image
⚙️ As far as the M270/HIMARS eco-system goes, the UK is only really interested in the bottom two missiles: ER-GMLRS for a 150km range, and PrSM for an 499km range. Image
⚙️ But the UK is not just interested in these two missiles, just these two from the M270/HIMARS ecosystem. JFS, Land Precision Strike, NSM, Camm-ER, SPEAR-EW. All demonstrated on a plethora of platforms and being held back in implementation by the lack of a common launcher. ImageImageImageImage
⚙️ HIMARS pods sit on an FMTV chassis, yet another vehicle platform that would be added to the UK inventory during a time where consolidation onto common vehicles would mitigate the need for some harsher cuts. Image
⚙️ The closed ecosystem means the MOD cannot use any of the missile industry in the UK. This part of UK defence industry is a success story, with proven missiles, expanding facilities in the UK and significant exports. None of which the US will allow onto M270 or HIMARS. Image
⚙️ Remember, the cost, complexity and effect of MLRS systems are the *missiles*, the launcher plays a smaller role. Image
⚙️ Denmark and the Netherlands have selected the Euro-PULS MLRS system.

➡️ Truck agnostic
➡️ Can be built in the UK
➡️ Open architecture
➡️ Accept UK built MBDA missiles
➡️ Accepts M31A2, ER-GMLRS and PrSM missiles
➡️ Same networked FCS as ATMOS, PzH 2000, RCH155, CAESAR Image
⚙️ As well as the IVECO above, PULS has also been seen on SCANIA, HEMTT, Mercedes and can probably be popped on a DAF made here in the UK over in Leyland as well. KMW/KNDS/MBDA are the Euro-PULS partners with large, security approved, footprints in the UK. ImageImageImage
⚙️ PULS also has a PULS-Light. Ostensibly a smaller frame for 122mm-160mm rockets, but with the same, common, networked, FCS and Open Architecture. Consider one common FCS/Architecture from BGOAA through MRAD to Deep Fires. Pop Brimstone canisters on that frame, amongst others. Image
⚙️ M270 has served the UK well. A wheeled MLRS delivers Deep Fires for Expeditionary forces.

However, HIMARS represents lock-in to a closed and limited effects eco-system, even if moved to a MAN.

The MOD would benefit from a Universal Launcher to fit future Euro-US effects to. Image
⚙️ When you consider that a full, 12 x M31A2 load on an M270B1 costs $1.2M in 2022 money, you rapidly understand why US missile manufacturers happily talk about integrating their missiles on other platforms. Selling the launchers is a bonus. PULS integration of M31A2 and PrSM👍 Image
⚙️ For further reading, happy to plug @thinkdefence's article on a Universal Launcher. We've been discussing this is detail for well over a decade.

thinkdefence.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/a-u…
⚙️ Have also helped with @thinkdefence's MCCO article which will give you an idea of what could be popped onto a "PULS Light" architecture in addition to other missiles and rockets with different target sets.

thinkdefence.co.uk/2023/02/mounte…
⚙️ @thinkdefence's piece on Land Precision Strike gives bridges what could be fitted to the PULS architecture to bridge the gap between MCCO and Deep Fires.

thinkdefence.co.uk/2022/12/land-p…
⚙️ A video of PULS is available on Elbit's YouTube channel. I'm assured KMW, KNDS and MBDA will have their own videos up shortly. Let this be a reminder!

⚠️ Quick disclaimer: I have no interests to declare in any of the systems mentioned, manufacturer, end users or any partners. i.e. no money/benefits.
⚙️ Hope this has been informative as to the status of the UK M270A2 recap, HIMARS discussions and an alternative.

I would be grateful for a Retweet of the Thread, a Like, and a Follow if you like this. Algorithms and all that.
/FIN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Other Chris

The Other Chris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TotherChris

Feb 21
The Bundeswehr have ordered 19 Skyranger 30 air defence systems.

1 x Prototype
18 x Skyranger 30 on Boxer
8 x MAN 15t armoured resupply vehicles
8 x Workshops
18 x Training systems

1/ Image
Like Gepard before it, Skyranger is a sensor and communications heavy system. German package is the "Skyranger 30 A3" including:

AHEAD ammunition
Stinger missiles with proximity sensors
IR search and track
Hensoldt AESA

€650M

2/
Prototype delivery this year. Delivery to units in 2026. Further order of 30 Skyranger 30 systems expected.

Part of the wider NNbS air defence programme.

Several export customers evaluating:

Denmark - Piranha
Austria - Pandur
Hungary - KF41 Lynx

3/ Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 24, 2023
The penny-wise pound-foolish Apache/JAGM saga continues.

The UK is now buying 3,000 JAGM missiles for $957.4M.

That equates to $319,000 per missile for a system already integrated onto our AH-64E's, that the UK has already trained on, which the UK has already paid for and received examples of for handling, from an Ally who is supposedly covering all extra costs of development, leaving little to no NRE expectations for the UK to bear.

Even if we go with the highest Brimstone 3 cost of £175,000 per missile which is meant to include Brimstone 3 R&D amortisation, even if we go with double the integration cost the UK was meant to "save" at £150M, the UK would have saved £110M by sticking with our own developed and proven system.

This does not even go into details such as re-investment in industry via procurement, tax recovery to Treasury or potential for exports (Poland's own AH-64E purchase is a vast missed opportunity). The UK already knows how to use and handle Brimstone eliminating most of the NRE with the system, and we have heard from defence ministers on the record in Parliament of the superior and battleproven hit rate of the Brimstone in active Operations compared to Hellfire based systems such as JAGM repeatedly over the years.

If we do take the lower of the purchase price per missile that is known for Brimstone and the £70M quoted as being "saved" by not integrating Brimstone on Apache, then for integration and purchase of 3,000 Brimstone on British AH-64E's we would expect to see a lower end cost, using DE&S own figures, of around £385M, saving almost £400M on this purchase compared to JAGM.

Even the £110M saving at the higher prices is desirable right now and would lead to further savings in future.

It is quite clear that the promised JAGM price reduction has not occurred.

BS was called at the time of the claims and these calls have clearly, demonstrably, been borne out.

This huge expense on an unproven foreign supplied missile with variations in reliability of supply, when a higher performing and perception-busting lower cost British missile exists and is in production, does not meet the claims at the time that JAGM would save the taxpayer money and should be both questioned and investigated.

@FTusa284 @JohnHealey_MP @nicholadrummond @Gabriel64869839 @thinkdefence @jedpc @JonHawkes275

Article on the purchase here:


Image
Meanwhile the Army is at great pains to show us WOLFRAM and the Mounted Close Combat Overwatch (MCCO) money being spent on Brimstone 3 integration onto their ground vehicles. With so much effort in Brimstone on Ajax, Boxer and Coyote, it is reasonable to expect the AAC to follow.

Image
Image
Image
With the first of the planned 16 Protectors arriving, the RAF already has faith in the Brimstone missile and has not signalled that they do not intend to use it.

As an aside, Protector aircraft cost "just" £15M a piece based on the last contract, again with NRE mostly paid for now. By saving money integrating Brimstone on AH-64E instead of JAGM, the RAF could have the funds to double the number of Protector aircraft and integrate more equipment onto them while still having cash to spare.

Read 5 tweets
Sep 19, 2023
⚙️ An approach to improving both Fleet Husbandry and Industrial Capability Husbandry for Army.

⏺️ Low Rate Production
⏺️ RESET Programme

1/ Image
⚙️ It is no secret that the Army's fleets have not received adequate TLC. Vehicles left outside in the British climate, insufficient spares ordered, vehicles cannibalised routinely.

2/ Image
⚙️ Similarly, it is no great secret that the very industrial base that the Army relies on has withered due to lack of engagement and orders. Infrastructure, sites, facilities, plant and skills have been allowed to erode.

3/ Image
Read 13 tweets
Sep 6, 2023
⚙️ How the US Army's RESET program interacts with the M2A3 Upgrade and M2A4 Acquisition Programmes.

Oversimplified for illustration:

RESET rebuilds an M2 to pre-combat condition.

M2A3 upgrade takes rebuilt subsystems/parts and assembles/integrates them with new subsystems.

1/ Image
Red River Army Depot handles most of the RESET program for Bradley.

RESET restores to pre-combat condition, the work does not extend to zero-mile.

A Bradley is stripped into parts bins. Parts are refurbished and only replaced if defective or overly worn.

2/ Image
These parts are then passed to BAES in Pennsylvania where they go through Final Assembly, Integration and Testing before being returned to inventory in a pre-combat condition.

3/ Image
Read 7 tweets
Sep 5, 2023
⚙️ Napkin process for introducing a common hulled Heavy APC, Heavy IFV and MBT to the British Army.

STEP 1: Start with the latest Namer 1500. It forms the foundation of your common hulled fleets.

Israel are open to licensed production and further partners. Image
⚙️ GDLS are currently contracted by the IDF to manufacture their Namers. Merthyr in Wales could be a route.

Another is Rafael's purchase of Pearson in Newcastle, an existing MBT factory recently undergoing re-investment including an MBT-grade 800t press.

pearson-eng.com/news/pearson-e…
⚙️ Quick aside: Rafael also manufacture Trophy and the Enforcer RWS used by Challenger 2/3. They are in the process of technology transfer to the Pearson site to manufacture in the UK.
Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 21, 2023
⚙️ An approach to the Land Mobility Pipeline

OUVS, MRV-P, GSUP, existing fleets of HMT, Foxhound, Mastiff, Wolf and other families.

Managing existing fleets, transitioning to replacements, developing families.

Pipeline is a very important part of the new Programme.

1/ Image
We're going take a look at a sound approach to husbandry of these category of vehicles and will do so through the lens of a couple of placeholder vehicle fleets. The fleets are candidates, but do consider the approach more than the vehicles themselves.

2/ Image
Land Mobility Pipeline intends to manage and replace a series of wheeled 4x4 and 6x6 vehicles in UK service.

It appears closer to an expanded OUVS than a re-hashed MRV-P. This is a Good Thing™.

3/ Image
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(