⚙️ MLRS and the UK
---
The Future Artillery Conference this week released new information on the UK's rocket artillery programmes as well as provided more information we can intuit from.
⚙️ As well as 155mm and 105mm artillery replacement programmes, both considered Close Support Fires, the UK has three funded Deep Fires programmes originating in work for Deep Fires Rocket System, Land Precision Strike and the Weapons Sector Research Framework.
⚙️ The first area delivering is re-engineering existing UK M270B1 chassis in three ways to "zero-hour" the fleet life and enable integration of future munitions.
🔴 Overhaul of all automotives
🔵 Entirely new, larger cab
🟢 Overhaul of launch system with new FCS
⚙️ This results in the M270A2 (right). The UK is increasing its numbers of M270's to 71 by following the US and topping up conversions from M270A0 vehicles in storage.
That's right, the UK is upping GMLRS to 71 and the good news is work is on track (!), on time and on budget.
⚙️ What we can intuit from this news is that the proposal of Lockheed Martin to introduce this work at their Ampthill UK facility hasn't been taken up.
This is a shame. Clearly WCSP cancellation has damaged LMUK's facilities and skills.
⚙️ This is a missed opportunity to repair damage to UK defence industry and to create a European M270/HIMARS hub. Italy, Spain and Greece had all expressed a preference for a European loc for upgrades, the UK being the most likely place outside of the US to have "full access".
⚙️ It is also no secret that the UK is in discussions to expand its MLRS fleet beyond 71 x M270A2. The most likely candidate being HIMARS.
If LMUK are not recapitalising M270A2, that means we can intuit the UK are talking to the US about purchasing under the FMS system.
⚙️ A wheeled MLRS system is ideal for the Army's Expeditionary / First Battle doctrine. Lockheed Martin are also looking at squeezing two M270 pods onto an FMTV and Rheinmetall are looking at putting the HIMARS frame (unclear if one or two pods) and FCS onto a MAN truck.
⚙️ No matter which MLRS you go for, however, it's the missiles that are the effect and quite simply M270/HIMARS are a closed architecture. No non-US missiles will be considered, and the US has other platforms for other missiles.
⚙️ As far as the M270/HIMARS eco-system goes, the UK is only really interested in the bottom two missiles: ER-GMLRS for a 150km range, and PrSM for an 499km range.
⚙️ But the UK is not just interested in these two missiles, just these two from the M270/HIMARS ecosystem. JFS, Land Precision Strike, NSM, Camm-ER, SPEAR-EW. All demonstrated on a plethora of platforms and being held back in implementation by the lack of a common launcher.
⚙️ HIMARS pods sit on an FMTV chassis, yet another vehicle platform that would be added to the UK inventory during a time where consolidation onto common vehicles would mitigate the need for some harsher cuts.
⚙️ The closed ecosystem means the MOD cannot use any of the missile industry in the UK. This part of UK defence industry is a success story, with proven missiles, expanding facilities in the UK and significant exports. None of which the US will allow onto M270 or HIMARS.
⚙️ Remember, the cost, complexity and effect of MLRS systems are the *missiles*, the launcher plays a smaller role.
⚙️ Denmark and the Netherlands have selected the Euro-PULS MLRS system.
➡️ Truck agnostic
➡️ Can be built in the UK
➡️ Open architecture
➡️ Accept UK built MBDA missiles
➡️ Accepts M31A2, ER-GMLRS and PrSM missiles
➡️ Same networked FCS as ATMOS, PzH 2000, RCH155, CAESAR
⚙️ As well as the IVECO above, PULS has also been seen on SCANIA, HEMTT, Mercedes and can probably be popped on a DAF made here in the UK over in Leyland as well. KMW/KNDS/MBDA are the Euro-PULS partners with large, security approved, footprints in the UK.
⚙️ PULS also has a PULS-Light. Ostensibly a smaller frame for 122mm-160mm rockets, but with the same, common, networked, FCS and Open Architecture. Consider one common FCS/Architecture from BGOAA through MRAD to Deep Fires. Pop Brimstone canisters on that frame, amongst others.
⚙️ M270 has served the UK well. A wheeled MLRS delivers Deep Fires for Expeditionary forces.
However, HIMARS represents lock-in to a closed and limited effects eco-system, even if moved to a MAN.
The MOD would benefit from a Universal Launcher to fit future Euro-US effects to.
⚙️ When you consider that a full, 12 x M31A2 load on an M270B1 costs $1.2M in 2022 money, you rapidly understand why US missile manufacturers happily talk about integrating their missiles on other platforms. Selling the launchers is a bonus. PULS integration of M31A2 and PrSM👍
⚙️ For further reading, happy to plug @thinkdefence's article on a Universal Launcher. We've been discussing this is detail for well over a decade.
⚙️ Have also helped with @thinkdefence's MCCO article which will give you an idea of what could be popped onto a "PULS Light" architecture in addition to other missiles and rockets with different target sets.
⚙️ @thinkdefence's piece on Land Precision Strike gives bridges what could be fitted to the PULS architecture to bridge the gap between MCCO and Deep Fires.
⚙️ A video of PULS is available on Elbit's YouTube channel. I'm assured KMW, KNDS and MBDA will have their own videos up shortly. Let this be a reminder!
⚠️ Quick disclaimer: I have no interests to declare in any of the systems mentioned, manufacturer, end users or any partners. i.e. no money/benefits.
⚙️ Hope this has been informative as to the status of the UK M270A2 recap, HIMARS discussions and an alternative.
I would be grateful for a Retweet of the Thread, a Like, and a Follow if you like this. Algorithms and all that.
/FIN
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
✈︎ A thread on spending towards the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP) and whether the UK should persevere.
🧵
✈︎ This thread is partly in response to an article by RUSI. Be sure to read this article, we're on the same side, and challenging / Red Teaming thoughts are what drives a better outcome. I do recommend following the author @Justin_Br0nk as well.
💂♀️ This is the KAC KS-1.
----
A direct gas operated AR in 5.56 made by Knights Armament Co of Titusville, Florida.
Scuttlebutt says this is Project HUNTER's selection to equip the Rangers and Royal Marines.
This is a colossal error, but not for the reasons some may think.
🧵
💂♀️ Right off the bat, the weapon itself is... fine. It almost certainly ticks all of HUNTER's requirements. I know genuine hard work is here. Pats on backs, wets and brews all round.
The worst thing to say about it is Soldier Systems have no opinion.
🛠️ Quick observation on the recent CAESAR production increase, as opposed to CAESAR itself.
Nexter managed to keep CAESAR production running at a level that can be described as Low Rate Production.
🛠️ The context is a recent announcement that production of CAESAR, a 155mm semi-portée howitzer, has been successfully increased to 6 per month or about 70 per year.
🛠️ How Nexter managed to do this is a combination of a little bit of intention and a series of events that were favourable in terms of production. However that doesn't mean we can't take a quick look at what happened and lift sustainable lessons from the intent and events.
⚙️ Unlike M2 Bradley, there are no desert storage depots for the in-development Tracked Boxer.
There are, however, 5 production lines for the wheeled Boxer MRAV and a pooled supply chain run through OCCAR:
2 lines in Germany
1 in the Netherlands
2 in the UK
~1 in Australia also
⚙️ Why the sudden thought experiments surrounding medium tracked vehicles for the UK? Yesterday's thread covers part. But to expand there is still a land war ongoing in Europe, grumblings about budgets and I have a fear of knee-jerk UOR procurements.
⚙️ M2 Bradley and the UK
---
A thought experiment exploring M2 Bradley's introduction to the British Army. How, why and what next.
⚙️ At time of writing the British Army's medium tracked fleets are not in a great shape. The Warrior IFV upgrade programme has been cancelled with the fleet now in sunset years and the Ajax programme is struggling to deliver, and won't provide an IFV even if it does.
⚙️ The adaptable Boxer programme is delivering, providing a much needed dual-role platform in the Expeditionary/Response role, and as a "Heavy Stryker" in the Cav and Dismount Delivery role for Follow On Forces. It has not yet had a turreted variant approved for Fire Support.
People forget that all Challenger 2 tanks in service or in storage use a still-classified armour called Dorchester (see Chobham). This family of armour was kindly shared with NATO allies and can also be seen on the M1A2, albeit with a different mix.
1/
Chobham/Dorchester, alongside the puissant skill at arms of its crews and employment by its Generals, is one of the reasons for the Challengers formidable reputation to survive and keep on coming.
2/
Chobham and Dorchester is an applied armour package attached to the rolled armoured hull of the base vehicle. It is not exclusive to Challenger or Abrams, nor must it be permanently affixed, per this Warrior IFV Chobham package hit by an anti-tank warhead.