Thread by @csranga

The Sengol represents Constituent Assembly Rama Rajya Pledged guarantee as explained by Dr Radhakrishnan...

Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute resoln has established that this guarantee is enforceable in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights when infringed

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1664671415570927617

The pious purpose of Kanchi Paramacharya is the common link between #SengolAtParliament and Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute resolution thus Art 26 inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya and worded by Dr Ambedkar preserves Rama Rajya Sengol pious purpose

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1663368783661260800

While people who worked for resolution of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute were unaware of Sengol importance same is true of people who worked to restore Sengol who have not publicly supported Art 363 dispute hence Kanchi Paramacharya pious purpose is common link of two

While #SengolAtParliament implements Kanchi Paramacharya pious purpose it will be complete only when interpretation of our Constitutional Rama Rajya established through resolution of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya is supported in SC under Art 147

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1663368783661260800

Hon'ble AG coincidentally shishya of Kanchi Matha using divine opportunity of Order 27A Rule (1) should let SC know its Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person under Part III is in violation of Constitutional Rama Rajya basic structure to fulfill Sengol pious purpose

Without Art 26 Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights the pious purpose of #SengolAtNewParliament is not complete as it becomes another symbol along with the many that exists in our Original Constitution and emblems as the Rama Rajya pious purpose will not be part of interpretation

We hope the Kanchi Paramacharya Shishyas will ponder on the above and do the needful to ensure that the pious purpose of Art 26 insertion to constitutionally preserve what Sengol represents by Kanchi Paramacharya is fulfilled by ensuring 👆