On 130th Jayanthi Mahotsavam of Kanchi Paramacharya let us understand the importance of Art 26 inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya worded by Dr Ambedkar and pledge to work to correct (mis)interpretation of Art 26 and align it with pious purpose of insertion
A rare collection got to know thru tweet of Shri @SVaidhyasubrama of both Nani Palkhivala and Rajaji speech.
Rajaji involved in Sengol ritual whose Rama Rajya pious purpose we now know protected in Art 26 can understand significance of Kesavananda Bharati
"Kesavananda Bharati: A seer from Kerala who saved the Indian Constitution 50 years ago" in recent articles..
A Matha gave Sengol whose significance reminded by
Kanchi Paramacharya who also inserted Art 26 which we now understand protects Sengol Rama Rajya pious purpose hence 👆
Many ancient Mathas sent letters on Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute with the same spirit as the one 👇 hence again when SC violated Sengol Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Art 26 which gave raise to dispute again Mathas have come forward to restore pious purpose
In SC Ayodhya judgement meaning of continuous wrong has been defined when an obligation is violated SC Sabarimala (mis)interpretation Deity is not a person for Part III falls in this category as it violated Rama Rajya pious purpose sooner corrected better for well-being of Nation
That it needs to be corrected for well-being of Nation is divine guidance of Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity in His Koorma form which is part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute and also many letters from ancient Mathas post #SengolAtNewParliament it is now time to act on it
What is now clearly a continuous wrong as defined by SC in Ayodhya judgement and based on above guidance not in the interests of Nation it is therefore time to act and correct hope Hon'ble AG will take suitable steps in this direction
SC in Ayodhya "continuing wrong is after all a continuing breach of the duty which itself is continuing. If a duty continues from day to day, the non-performance of that duty from day to day is a continuing wrong.." Constitutional Rama Rajya Oath duty violated in Sabarimala
SC in Ayodhya "continuing wrong is after all a continuing breach of the duty which itself is continuing. If a duty continues from day to day, the non-performance of that duty from day to day is a continuing wrong.." The Wrong opinion on Art 363 dispute falls into this category
The wrong official opinion which prevented Art 143 reference in Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute falls under category of continuing wrong and hence it is the duty of Hon'ble AG to correct it by suitable response to invocation of Order 27A Rule (1)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Having installed Sengol in Parliament let us work to make it erect for well-being of our Nation by correcting the wrong Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person u Part III which is in violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents
"Shri Parameshwarji Eklingji Maharaj is the Sovereign of Mewar, and Shriji as His sole representative shall exercise on His behalf all rights, authority & jurisdiction." From Mewar Constitution
Sovereignty of Dharma basic structure of Bharat Constitution
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" Dr Radhakrishnan defining Bharat's Objectives resolution when we comp with Pakistan 👆
Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity Koorma Form July 18th SC Judgement quotation part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler"
The #SengolAtParliament reminds us of the practical truth of above statement from the story of Kannagi
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref
Sengol in Parliament does bend when SC violates dharma by infringing on Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights in our Constitutional Rama Rajya and when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute arises duty of Hon'ble President & Hon'ble MPs to correct
Sengol ritual of 14th Aug 1947 and how Rajaji who played integral part understood it with Shri Rama as Embodiment of Dharma in effect attaches Dr Radhakrishnan's definition of Objectives Resolution of Bharat to resoln body & then we compare with Pakistan
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" this defn of Dr Radhakrishnan merger of Deity Kingdoms to form Bharat make sense
“Maharaja Chitra Tirunal Balarama Varma who was by tradition ruling on behalf of Absolute, brought Constitution of India into operation in Travancore with the consent of Deity Padmanabha Swamy after being promised goal of Rama Rajya” makes sense
The pious purpose of Kanchi Paramacharya is the common link between #SengolAtParliament and Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute resolution thus Art 26 inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya and worded by Dr Ambedkar preserves Rama Rajya Sengol pious purpose
While people who worked for resolution of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute were unaware of Sengol importance same is true of people who worked to restore Sengol who have not publicly supported Art 363 dispute hence Kanchi Paramacharya pious purpose is common link of two
Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute established 8 Kingdoms w Deity as Ruler (Orchha, Travancore, Mewar, Kashi etc..) where Sovereignty of Dharma restored post paramountcy Dr Radhakrishnan interpretation of Constituent Assembly pledge& Sengol ritual to be seen in this light
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" Dr Radhakrishnan interpretation of Constituent Assembly guarantee imp for merger is what Sengol symbolizes
It is the Constitutional Rama Rajya framed on the basis of Constituent Assembly pledged guarantee represented by Sengol as defined by Dr Radhakrishnan which was brought into force in many Kingdom with Deity as Ruler with consent of Deities
Telangana the 29th State that was chosen to restore Art 29 Shri Rama Bhakthi culture of Bharat present in Constitutional Rama Rajya which we would have lost due to wrong interpretation of our Constitution by SC that Deities have no constitutional rights
Devotion above Politics
The support to Deity Rights across political spectrum of Telangana Politicians highlighted by important historic letters
Telangana Tiruppan Alwar community support for Deity Rights which secured devotional community "Ammal " title and if the officials hadn't come in the way through wrong opinion the Deity Rights notification would have been secured