Thread with excerpts from "Timurids in Transition: Turko-Persian Politics and Acculturation in Medieval Iran" by Maria Subtelny
the book focuses on Sultan Husain Bayqara, great-great-grandson of Timur the Lame whose rule comprised a third of the Timurid period en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultan_Hu…
Timur the Lame as half steppe warlord, half Islamic mystic - the “Lord of the Auspicious Conjunction” who dreamed prophecies & read minds.
Turko-Mongol political & legal customs were very important in the Timurid realms. They were not codified, and separated nomads from sedentary peoples. Timur’s preference for those customs over sharia led him to be considered an infidel by some Islamic thinkers.
Sharia didn’t become superior to Turko-Mongol customary law in Timurid realms until 1411. Civilizing process was slow, & Islamic education wasn’t expanded until mid-15th century due to threat of Hurufi heresy. Some syncretism was allowed - horsemeat & kumis were deemed halal.
Timurid Cossacks (Qazaqi) - brigands formed from men who fled to the periphery for whatever reason. Feuding pretenders recruited from them in their campaigns for the throne, & would reward them with power if they won.
Authoress is right to be skeptical of some of the ancestral claims of Sultan Husain Bayqara. If he was the ninth-generation descendant of an 11th century Sufi saint, then male generation times in that line would be 54 years on average.
While Herat was overwhelming Hanafi Sunni in 1470s, Turko-Mongols in Khorazm & Khorasan were influenced by Sufis who had taken the role previously held by pagan shamans. The Sufis spread heterodox ideas & mystic practices, some of which were Shia in origin.
Sultan Husain strictly enforced sharia law after his final capture of Herat. Despite the hypocrisy of his court, the morality police were quite active.
Sultan Husain’s original Turkic friends, while capable soldiers, were brigands who could only obtain money through plunder - devastating Khorasan. It was Persian bureaucrats from Khaf who would reintroduce orderly accounting, bureaucracy, & finance to the realm.
Timurids faced the problem that always confronts barbarians establishing settled states: allow nobility broad autonomy & wealth which weaken state finances & force collaborative government - or solidify state authority & secure finances at cost of loyalty of nobility & military.
Islamic philosophy and institutions offered - at least in the Timurid realms - some moral & legal protection for the peasantry. Excessive taxation & extortion were viewed as un-Islamic.
Late Timurid thinkers developed their own idea of a mixed constitution - the four social classes of soldiers, bureaucrats, artisans/traders, and peasants needed to be kept in balance like bodily humors. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_gov…
Timurids restored water infrastructure in their realms, allowing for population growth in some areas such as Herat. However, warfare between Timur’s successors destroyed Sistan’s dams, depopulating Sistan for at least forty years.
Islamic inheritance laws are unfavorable to women, but many took advantage of Hanafi legal interpretations that allowed for property (including businesses) to be inalienably endowed to a charity whose beneficiaries could be assigned by the donor.
About 30% of properties in Herat region towards the end of the 15th century were owned by charitable endowments.
Corruption in Islamic charities was well-known as far back as the 13th century AD, and differed little from the rampant corruption in USian charities today.
Uzbek conquerors taxed Timurid-era charities into ruin or outright seized their properties.
Islamic jurists had a dim view of visiting graves as either a false imitation of the hajj or outright idolatry, but were largely ignored by the masses from the 9th century on. Shrine pilgrimages were popular in Timurid era.
Safavids promoted pilgrimages to shrines in late 16th century as a replacement of the hajj.
Ottoman-Safavid relations were horrible at the time, so Shia Safavids blocked the (still Hanafi Sunni) Central Asian Moslems from making the hajj.
Babur noted that the last Timurids had grown soft as their realm was becoming civilized. He was right - the Uzbeks under the Shaybanids invaded Khorasan & destroyed the Timurids in 1507.
it’s a quick read, well written, & very interesting. I think a lot of you guys would like the book - not just for specifics on 15th century Khorasan but also for cultural convergences in civilizing processes, water management, & political theory.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread with excerpts from "The Other Quiet Revolution: National Identities in English Canada, 1945-71" by Jose Igartua
Author argues national identity among English-speaking Canadians died entirely in mid-20th century, and was replaced by a broader civic identity. Nonetheless there is still an English-Canadian nation that can be seen sociologically through shared culture.
90% of Canadians read at least one newspaper in 1969, compared to only 68% watching television news. Spread of opinion polling ended up restricting range of public discussion.
Thread with excerpts from "Lies of the Tutsi in Eastern Congo/Zaire. A Case Study: South Kivu (Pre-Colonial to 2018)" by John Kapapi
At the time of the 1884 Berlin Conference, what is now the eastern Congo was ruled by eight kingdoms. Rwanda had yet to be united. Per the author, Rwandan (Tutsi & Hutu) migration west of Lake Kivu was minimal at the time.
Belgians created two chiefdoms in North Kivu. One was given to Tutsi from Hunde in 1922, & other was bought from the Hunde in 1939. Conflict with Hunde led to Tutsi preferring to flee to South Kivu during the dynastic struggles following overthrow of King Rwabugiri in 1895.
In line with archaeology, western & central Iberia were populated by hunter-gatherers distinctive from those on Mediterranean coast by their higher Magdalenian ancestry. Those hunter-gatherers had a resurgence over the EEFs as elsewhere during neolithic.
Steppe ancestry in IEs was diluted by the time that they reached SW Iberia at end of third millennium, in line with other studies. However, there are signs of an Eastern Mediterranean migration to Iberia in Bronze Age or earlier:
There was substantial migration to urban areas in Portugal during the Roman period from Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa. If these samples are representative, about half of the urban population was foreign-derived. Date of the site isn't provided, but was after 100 BC.
Caesar's destructiveness around the Rhine can be seen in the palynological record around Cologne. The area was densely cultivated starting about 250 BC and reforested after 50 BC, implying depopulation for a century.
pre-modern mass migrations often had appalling death tolls. Pressure of the German Suebi on the Celt Helvetii must have been tremendous:
Tiberius withdrew Roman troops from east of the Rhine, but left a 10 km no man's land that wasn't resettled by Germans until the late first or early second centuries.