Read on Twitter
Not that I agree with RT'ing disinformation, but worth saying that major newspapers are still publishing this stuff. If a @WSJ reporter even got this pack of wilful lies through copy editing, I'm pretty sure they would subsequently be up for a firing.
wsj.com/articles/can-t…
wsj.com/articles/can-t…
This piece is a One Stop Shop for such outright lies, logical fallacies, cherry picking, and malignant idiocy you can use it as a case study for Climate Disinformation 101, a workshop an OCJN member actually led last week.
We know most audiences don't distinguish between the "opinion" pages vs regular reporting pages (and the idea opinion pages should publish inaccurate info is bizarre), so pieces like this confuse audiences, undermines work of journalists + scientists, and legitimises utter lies
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
