If you have not watched “Shiny Happy People” on Amazon, do. If you are in the evangelical circles, please, you really should. Most importantly, we need to consider the breadth of IBLP’s influence and teachings, and ask how this affects what we see happening today...
Much has (rightly) been made of Josh Duggar’s abuse, how it was minimized and glossed over. How the girls were pressured into acting like it was ok. How the focus was immediately on forgiveness, and not on caring for survivors or assessing real change in an abuser...
How everyone defended the Duggar’s handling of it and ignored the dangers of failing to get Josh and his sisters help. But did you know that the Duggar’s pastor when the story first broke and all of that was happening, was eventual SBC Executive Committee President Ronnie Floyd?
You can read Dr. Floyd’s response to the revelations and all of those dynamics, here. people.com/tv/duggars-pas…
And you can read how Dr. Floyd responded to the SBC abuse crisis and a high profile case of abuse in the SBC, in this report here by searching for his name. documentcloud.org/documents/2203….
Mishandling of abuse doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Especially in the evangelical world. There are teachings, people and ideas that long predated where we are now. That set the stage, that formed the framework.
And if you haven’t been immersed in this world and done a deep dive into key figures like Gothard, you may be completely unaware of some of the ideas and theologies that formed even your own foundation, and certainly helped shape the framework you operate in.
Happy Shiny People is worth the watch. So is asking the hard questions, looking for the connections, being willing to see the patterns, and then truly examining where those things may have impacted your own community, and even your own underlying assumptions, ideas and beliefs.
Then look at those ideas and beliefs, and “search the Scriptures to see if these things be so."
It's not about destroying the church or the gospel. It's about *rescuing it* from such gross misrepresentation and abuse.
It's not about "destroying a godly man". It's about following Biblical standards for what leaders should be. About the accountability for teachers that Scripture commands. And *that* is about love for Christ, and love for others.
I am so proud of the survivors for raising their voice. But imagine how many could have been saved, if other leaders alongside Gothard, had stood directly against what he taught, and did it publicly and zealously?
Why did the wounded have to carry that load again?
We can't change the failures from before. But we can do everything in power to make sure we don't repeat them, and to tear down false ideologies that lead to such deep harm. If we are willing to ask the hard questions and see the real answers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No, MSU, you are not sorry. You are choosing over and over to refuse transparency and truth to the 100's of children you allowed to be assaulted by your doctor.
There are multiple ways we could set this up to get answers in a trauma-informed, truthful way.
Stop telling us that you are sorry in the same breath that you refuse to tell the truth, 6 yrs later.
You are not paying the price. We are. It's an insult to pretend an apology as you literally refuse the steps for healing and the truth.
Institutional transformation, crisis response and legally-sound strategies for achieving both objectives is one of my professional fields of expertise. I've offered to help set this up.
Your response is silence, dishonesty and feigned sorrow.
They knew. In 2004. They did nothing, and there were more victims.
How exactly did an SBC mega church respond to disclosures of sexual abuse by well- known leader Paul Pressler? Much like Penn State. See the screenshots in the thread...
Screenshots of the victim's testimony in 2004. He reported Pressler requiring him to perform massages with Pressler in his underwear, making him remove his clothes and sit nude with Pressler, and then forcefully removing his swim trunks and touching his buttocks.
How did the church respond? See the deposition in the current civil suit:
Pressler's behavior was classified just like "pantsing" and said to be "not uncommon".
Jenner and Block is the firm that repped USAG in the bankruptcy proceedings against survivors. As co-chair of the court-appointed fiduciary committee, I wasn't impressed for any of the years we dealt with them.
Serious red flags with this "investigation" include:
No one believed Ravi was an abuser, until an independent investigation brought it to light. No one believed Lori Ann, until a third party validated the patterns.
Once that happened, every leader jumped to write about it and offer opinions, though. . .
Not one of those leaders had pushed for the actual process that brought it to light, and many had helped delay it by continuing to support Ravi's narrative without having seen or heard the evidence.
And that narrative would never have changed, the truth would never have come out, had RZIM not commissioned the Miller and Martin investigation that provided a safe place for survivors to come forward so that the evidence and the patterns could actually be brought to light.
Here is the rest of MacArthur’s quote and why it matters to the present discussion of the TGC article, and overall discussion related to abuse in church spaces.
One of the concerns raised with the recent TGC article was how the language placed the husband in a priestly or salvific type of role (as one example, bringing an “offering” into the most holy of places and leaving it on her alter.)
A question raised is how this could escape the notice of those who reviewed it. One potential answer to this question is that we have long accepted teaching that places the husband in this role, albeit in a nicer-sounding way.