Nick Touran Profile picture
Jun 6 14 tweets 6 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) is the Dark Horse of today's nuclear reactors. It's modern, efficient, resilient, broadly licensed, and proven buildable in record time. (a 🧵...) Image
Having been built before, it's (obviously) a fully-complete design, already licensed and ready to rock in the USA, Japan, and the UK. Here's its design certification from the NRC: nrc.gov/reactors/new-r… Image
The first-ever ABWRs were built in record-setting time, 37 months & 15 days from groundbreaking to initial criticality. How's that for too slow? 😮 Image
Hitachi made an excellent video detailing how exactly they were able to deliver this. They simulated all aspects of construction in elaborate detail and perfected it before breaking ground.
The US had a pair of ABWRs ready to build, with full COLs issued at South Texas Project. But the project was ahead of its time; people weren't quite as excited about reliable clean energy as they are now. It'd be great to revive the project! nrc.gov/reactors/new-r… Image
Taiwan started but never finished building a pair of ABWRs. Attempts to authorize their completion have started several times, but struggled. Now is an excellent time to complete them. They could make 5.5% of Taiwan's electricity clearly and reliably en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lungmen_N… Image
ABWRs have excellent Gen III resilience. They're designed for 0.3G earthquakes. Lungmen was upgraded to 0.4G. Their resilience was proven at KK6-7 during the Chuetsu earthquake in 2007, well above the design basis. (H/T @Brian_C_Johnson) tepco.co.jp/en/hd/ourbusin… Image
ABWRs can load follow elegantly. You just change the speed of the internal recirculation pumps and the water density in the core changes, adjusting power rapidly without control rod motions or chemical shim. This can help meet demand and integrate nicely with renewables. Image
Being the first type of reactor designed specifically for power stations, BWRs don't have steam generators or dissolved boric acid, greatly reducing several long term operational issues encountered at PWRs. Image
In terms of getting climate impact from action, completing the already-started ABWRs in Taiwan may be about the most impactful thing anyone can do. What's it going to take to convince Taiwan to get these beautiful modern machines up and running? @AngelicaOung? Image
And in the US, let's get someone restarting the efforts on the South Texas Project ABWRs!
(BTW thanks to @Brian_C_Johnson, one of the world's top nuclear engineers, for helping list the wonderful things about ABWRs. Too bad he doesn't tweet much.)
Direct link to that Shika 2 construction video here:
In case anyone has doubts, the ABWR is absolutely an advanced reactor. It's built based on decades of hard-learned experience from previous BWR models, plus it says so right in the name. The best definition of 'advanced' is when a design evolves based on real world experience.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Touran

Nick Touran Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @whatisnuclear

Oct 24, 2022
Almost unbelievably, there are 3500 exajoules of nuclear energy in these 48.3K tonnes of uranium, accessible using breeder reactor tech we demo'd in 1952. The world uses about 600 EJ of primary energy per year (including everything!!), so that's about 6 years of world energy.
Rather than breeder reactors, we use non-breeder reactors today, which get about 1% of the energy from the mined uranium. Our earlier attempts at deploying more breeder reactors were thrwarted by anti-nuclear activism and minor technology complexities whatisnuclear.com/recycling.html
Like, the Germans build a top-notch breeder reactor called SNR-300. It was world-class. It was completed and fueled. Right before they turned it on, protests broke out and they never operated it. Now it's a goofy theme park. 🤡
Read 8 tweets
Oct 3, 2022
Another cool thing about nuclear energy is just how ridiculously flexible it is. It can be used basically everywhere, in any environmental condition imaginable. A 🧵... (1/9)
2/ The first obvious example is deep under the sea. After the Navy made nuclear-powered submarines, they immediately went on grand adventures previously unheard of. The Nautilus went to the North Pole under the ice, and the Triton circumnavigated the world without surfacing.
3/ We used a number of microreactors to power remote locations, like in Antarctica (PM-3A) and under the ice in an Ice Base in northern Greenland called Camp Century (see unbelievable doco here ) PM-3A nuclear reactor at McMurdo Station, AntarcticaNuclear powered ice base Camp Century in Greenland
Read 9 tweets
Oct 17, 2021
Paul Dorfman, one of @greenpeace's main nuclear commentators, just blocked me (a Ph.D. scientist) after pointing out a glaring and egregious error in his analysis. He said nuclear wasn't low carbon. I pointed out, calmly and patiently, that it was.
Basically he was taking the lowest number and the highest number out of a Yale meta-analysis and saying that the 'mean' was the midpoint (around 57). But the real mean is 17.8 and the median is 12.
Knowing these kinds of threads can get ugly, I made a specific point to remain calm and not insulting. But rather than face the error, he blocked. That's his prerogative. You should watch out for anyone else making this ridiculous error to conclude that nuclear is high carbon
Read 4 tweets
Oct 24, 2020
This is so shockingly anti-scientific given the numbers at hand. Sunlight creates 2,000,000,000,000 Becquerel of C-14 in our atmosphere every single day and @Greenpeace says that this water, with 2-200 Bq/L, is going to alter human DNA. @ShaunBurnie wut!? doi.org/10.1002/2015GL…
Natural sunlight produces the entire net quantity of C-14 in all the tanks (63 GBq) every 43 minutes in our atmosphere.
Make that 39 minutes. Here's the math so anyone and everyone can see that I'm right. Using the famous GNU Units program here. C-14 production rate from LLNL in the DOI publication in my 1st tweet above. Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(