Sir Alex Ferguson before winning a single league title at Manchester United spent 4m in one window. The British transfer record at the time was 4.2m
The equivalent of that in modern football is just under 140m in one window based on Coutinho being the current British record
We broke the British transfer record multiple times. We paid the highest wages. The first 50k a week player in the PL was here.
We financially bullied broke clubs into selling us their best players in an era where failure wasn't rewarded with hundreds of millions in TV money
We were fortunate enough to be one of the first clubs to benefit from the commercialisation of football when huge commercial sponsorships started to come in
This club was built on money. It just came from sponsors rather than an Arab. Does it really matter where it came from?
Every single bit of success Manchester United had under SAF and onwards came from money.
A handful of once in a lifetime academy players that were good enough from being teenagers being sprinkled into already successful and expensive teams isn't what this lot make it out to be.
And none of that is a bad thing.
Manchester United should be spending money.
The reason we are shit now is because between 2005-2014 we spent years spending fuck all letting everyone else catch up and stagnated ourselves in the process.
People will point to what the Glazers have spent in the last few years out of desperation whilst ignoring that we were signing shite like Obertan, Bebe and Michael Owen on a free to save money whilst Chelsea and City bought 10 top players a season and became what they are today.
Between selling Ronaldo in 2008 and signing RVP in 2012 Manchester United had a lower net spend than Aston Villa and Stoke City.
We are where we are because we stopped doing what City are doing now and let them catch up. This is self inflicted. Nobody else to blame.
The club has made its own problems, it's fanbase has played a large part in enabling that.
As a result City may well match our biggest achievement. And if they do they'll deserve it. They spent what it took to win. Just like we used to.
Maybe if our idiot fans spent as much time holding Manchester United employees accountable for their performances as they do worshipping them for embarrassing the club against it's rivals every couple of months, Manchester United wouldn't be in this position.
But we are. So take it on the chin if City win a treble and have a bit of fucking shame about it.
If you want to moan about something, go moan about these idiots throwing a party after losing a fucking cup final to them to hand them the treble on a plate.
Hope this helps
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Manchester Uniteds shameless employees reaction after embarrassing results, a thread.
About time this is viewed as one collective mentality issue running through the club for years on end that needs to be dealt with rather than passing it off as a "blip" every few weeks.
-
Manchester United 1 Tottenham Hotspur 6.
"His tactics are perfect" - Bruno Fernandes on Ole after the disgusting result.
A few weeks later, he came out with this hideous self centred shit.
Relegation fighting Sheffield United win their first ever game at Old Trafford, ending Manchester Uniteds title chances
Manchester United captain straight after the game jumps on Instagram to promote his passing stats.
Qatars money will obviously help to dominate the sport.
There's isn't a single sporting reason for any Manchester United fan to have a problem with being owned by Qatar.
Not one. They will clearly provide every possible resources to Manchester United in order for Manchester United to be successful in the sport of football.
If you treat Manchester United like some sort of fucking cult there to fulfil things you are missing out on elsewhere in life rather than looking at it as a football club that exists for the sole purpose of competing in a sport.
Agree with this obviously but generally speaking pushing it every day just desensitizes people to some extent.
Not a dig at anyone but some of the "anti Glazer tweets" are just pure spam at the moment that won't do anything much. Needs some sort of coordination here
The reason this worked so well is because it was done on a match day when lots of people will be active (including the media) and nothing was made public until that day so it was something new that caught peoples attention rather than the same old shit.
A lot of what I'm seeing now is just an unorganized mess. Appreciate people are just doing all they can to help but ffs.
One of you with some leadership skills must be able to understand the concept of timing with social media protests rather than this haphazard approach 💀
Quick thread to get things straight with this "billion spent in the last decade", net spend tables and other such bollocks from uneducated people -
The Glazers have owned Manchester United for 17 years.
Not 10.
In the first 7 years of that combined, Manchester United had an absolutely laughable 143m net spend.
For 4 years of that, Manchester United had a negative net spend, between selling Ronaldo for 80m and signing RVP, Manchester United spent less than Sunderland and Aston Villa.
The club had constant piss poor windows like this one of signing one fucking player and having a 4 million net spend whilst Chelsea and City were spending 150m on 10 players at a time.