Tristan S. Rapp Profile picture
Jun 6, 2023 28 tweets 13 min read Read on X
THREAD - the Origin and Survival of the Norse Longship

(1) Few symbols are as archetypically associated with the ancient Vikings as the longship - dragon-prowed galleys, spreading dread & fire across the shores of Europe. But where did they originate, & where end? Image
(2) First, about the longship. Norse vessels were clinker-hulled, a style also known as the lapstrake, wherein the planks of the hull were arranged such that they overlapped with each other, forming the characteristic "striped" appearance of the Viking-ship. Image
(3) This was distinct from the style employed in the south, which was a 'mortise and tenon' technique called the Phoenician joint, wherein interlocking joints formed the cohesive, water-tight hull.

Invented by the titular Phoenicians, it was later adopted by the Greeks & Romans Image
(4) Ship-building in the Mediterranean has a long and storied history, producing such famous vessels as the biremes, triremes and other great galleys of the classical world. Northern ship-building, however, seems to have originated independently. Image
(5) The longship, and the Nordic boating-tradition in general, seems to have had its origins in ancient dugout canoes, constructed plausibly as far back as the pre-Indo-European Pitted Ware people, who appear to have sourced many nautical-related words in later Germanic ImageImage
(6) Our first attested evidence of the predecessors of the longship stem from the Nordic Bronze Age, circa 4000-2500 years ago in the form of petroglyphs. Though heavily stylised, they appear to show vessels of varying sizes, some carrying large crews. ImageImageImage
(7) The boats portrayed in the Bronze Age carvings are strongly clarified by a remarkable find - the Hjortspring boat, discovered on the isle of Als in southern Denmark and dating to roughly 2400ya, only about a century after the end of the Nordic BA. ImageImage
(8) The Hjortspring boat is the oldest vessel in the longship-tradition we have physical remains of.

It bears striking similarities to the images on the petroglyphs, evidencing a deep continuity. ImageImage
(9) The Hjortspring is a canoe - it is clinker-built, like the later Norse ships, but interestingly, it is held together not by metal nails, but through sewing. The same technique is seen in the Norwegian Halsnøy boat, dating from only a century later. ImageImage
(10) Though the Nordic clinker-design is globally unique, the sewn-plank technique is not. It has developed, evidently independently, in cultures across the world, notably the Austronesians, among whom it is still the favoured technique for traditional canoes. ImageImage
(11) In the first few centuries after Christ, the sewn technique was gradually replaced in Scandinavia by metal rivets that locked the boards together, but the design of overlapping planks was maintained and refined, producing the earliest "proto-longships"
(12) The Nydam boat from southern Jutland dates to 300 AD, and is the earliest "true", metal-riveted clinker-ship we know. It in many ways already resembles the famous Viking-ships of 4 centuries - noticeably, however, it lacks any evidence of mast or sail. ImageImage
(13) Indeed, sails appear to have been a relatively late addition to northern shipcraft. In England, the famous Sutton Hoo ship, found in the great royal burial dating to the 5-600s, was sail-less.

The adoption of sails, then, post-dates the Anglo-Saxon migrations. ImageImage
(14) Sails were not a pre-requisite for Germanic sea-raiding. Though we tend to elide the memory of maritime pirates before the Vikings, the Anglo-Saxons arrived very much as "wicingas" themselves, and the Franks were pillaging shores in Late Antiquity.

(15) Though, as detailed, the invention of Nordic ship-building occurred parallel to developments in the Mediterranean, the adoption of mast-technology by the Germanic peoples does appear to have been a result of southern influence. With this final step, the Viking-ship was born. Image
(16) Though we often tend to think of "Viking ships" as a monolithic category, in truth there were several distinct varieties.

Strictly speaking, only the long, low and streamlined ships built for raiding and long voyages were "longships" proper. Image
(17) Another type was the "knarr" - shorter, wider and deeper than war-going longships, these were built for freighting cargo.

The "karve" was a small ship in the style of the longship, but closer in size to the knarr. They were often used for coastal and riparian raids. ImageImage
(18) It is worth noting, as I have indicated earlier, that "Viking"-style ships were not actually exclusive to the Vikings themselves.

Similar, clinker-hulled vessels were in fact predominant among all the North Sea peoples, and would have made up King Alfred's fleet. Image
(19) What the Norse perfected, however, was a particular type of clinker-built vessel, unsurpassed in speed, maneuverability and capacity for long-distance voyages.

It was with these, more than any weapon or innovation of armour, that they conquered the northern world. Image
(20) What, then, of the ultimate fate of the northern longship? When the British came to India, or the Danes re-visited Greenland, it was not, of course, in clinker-hulled ships. What happened to drive them into obsolescence, and when did they finally fade from use? Image
(21) Norse-style ships persisted in general use for longer than some might think. When William the Bastard conquered England in 1066, the Bayeux tapestry shows that conducted his forces in a fleet of serpent-headed drakkar, a late variety of Viking ship. Image
(22) In fact, clinker-hulled longships remained dominant in Scandinavia all the way into the 1300s, and thus centuries after Christianisation and the end of the Viking-age.

As late as 1393, coastal levies (leiðangr or ledung) were setting out in longships. Image
(23) The end of the longship ultimately came with the rise of carvel planking in the late Middle-ages - an innovation on the ancient Mediterranean mortises and tenon-technique, which allowed the construction of ships so tall that the low longships simply could not board them. ImageImage
(24) This was the end of the Viking-ship, some 400 years after the Viking-age, but it was not, in fact, the end of the Norse clinker-hulled boat.

In the remote fjords of Norway, far from the hard competition of the south, the ancient technique survived. Image
(25) To this day, in the northern regions of Norway, folk build the so-called "Nordland-boats", constructed in the same clinker-style, at times strikingly reminiscent of the ancient longship. ImageImage
(26) The Nordland-boats come in many varieties, as did the old Norse ships - there are the large fembørings, up to 14 metres long, the slightly smaller seksrorings, the middle-sized åttrings (circa 8m) all the way down to the 5m færings, the smallest of the boats. ImageImageImage
(27) Norway today is no longer the bastion of remote tradition it once was, and the traditional use of the Nordland-boats - subsistence fishing - has now become obsolete, threatening to draw the ships with it.

Yet in recreation and leisure, the ships have found a new life. Image
(28) That, then, is the end of our story, charting the origins, heights, and improbable survival of nearly 5 millennia of unbroken ship-building tradition.

Even now, the longship lives on. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tristan S. Rapp

Tristan S. Rapp Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Hieraaetus

May 6
A striking takeaway of the last 10 years of the aDNA revolution - from the Indo-Europeans, to the Bantu, to the Swahili, to the Japanese - is that you might sooner trust a toddler to pick out a 50-meter target with a revolver than an archaeologist to identify an ancient migration Image
Image
It should be self-evident that we cannot simply derive from this a reverse principle, and conclude that wherever contemporary archaeologists denied a purported migration, it really did take place - yet the scope of the discrediting is remarkable.
What are we to make of as-yet unresolved fine-grained questions, such as the Dorian invasion, the Hebrew conquest of Canaan or other traditional narratives long contested by the now-dubious consensus? Again, we cannot simply default to the inverse conclusion, but one wonders. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 7
"Real, unembellished history" according to quite a number of historians seems to consist largely of ppl sitting around, munching bread and porridge, between periodic bursts of fighting over miscellaneous economic factors. Image
>Knight is recorded as composing a poem to persuade his captor lord to free him:
"Bet that happened lol"
>King gives a stirring speech before battle:
"Sure that happened"
>Viking is heads out to Constantinople, motivated by a dream:
"Definitely not embellished mhm" Image
Never underestimate a dusty historian's ability to regard as improbable literally any display of human spontaneity, whimsy or unconditioned willpower.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 3
This is only half true. Rwanda is a cohesive, fairly well-run and (by regional standards) prosperous and stable country. The Congo, it is true, is essentially not a real state, hence why the massive size disparity between it and Rwanda confers no military advantage.
It is an interesting quirk of the global export of the nation state system that we aren't really able to account for "unorganized regions" anymore. With the exception of Antarctica, every plot of land *must* be attached to a specific polity with a government and a flag.
This works well enough in some parts of the world, but it obviously fails elsewhere, where the reality on the ground simply fails to match the internationally recognised construct. The Darién Gap is only "part" of Panama and Colombia in the most tenuously nominal sense. Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 11
There is a phenomenon I've noticed a lot in many contemporary walks of life - term it "introductionism": ppl never actually reading primary literature, or watching classical movies, or engaging directly with high art, but interacting with everything through "accessible" mediums Image
Image
Image
Image
In a world of limited time, I've come around to the realisation that 8/10 times, instead of reading a book ABOUT Shakespeare, read Shakespeare. Read Plato. Just read that book you want to get to, don't read endless books ABOUT reading that book. Image
"You can just do things", but for literature and the other arts.

Sure, you might need some help to interpret, say, Aristotle or Hegel - so maybe get a complimentary book to help you, or read a brief introduction to the core concepts, but *do not* then stop there.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 10
Unclear why so many seem to struggle to understand that just because the original speakers of Proto-Indo-European *were* a single, definable ethnogroup, that doesn't mean IE-speakers *today* are.
Obviously there's no such thing as an "Indo-European race" - Indians, Afghans, Kurds, Spaniards, Germans and Lithuanians are not all part of one esoteric, "hyperborean" identity. But the original PIE-speakers would indeed have been a particular tribe or cluster of related tribes.
"Indo-European-speaking peoples" is the correct term today, because thousands of years after the aboriginal PIE-speakers left their Urheimat, the correlation between steppe-ancestry and language is extremely small. But, again, that doesn't mean this retroactively applies as well.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 9
One of the most frustrating tendencies in academic conversations around novel belief systems like Wicca or New Age spirituality is researchers caveating all their (invariably devastating) assessments of the historical claims with varieties of "-of course far be it from me to devalue people's deeply held beliefs, I don't want to say that anyone is wrong in their convictions..."

Rubbish. If somebody is claiming to be "reviving the authentic religious expression of the British Isles (or wherever)", and you are systematically demolishing every one of the assertions underpinning said religious system, then you patently ARE devaluing said misguided notions.Image
Truth claims are truth claims - it is not "kind" or "respectful" to treat these as ultimately irrelevant, and indeed doing so is ultimately a sign of supreme arrogance and contempt, since you don't even consider it worth *looking at* whether said beliefs are correct.
I ultimately have substantially more respect for both Richard Dawkins & Ray Comfort than I do for the dithering, obsequious academics who, in their attempts to be conscientious, end up treating ppl like you would a little girl being told that yes she is a princess.

Pic unrelated Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(