Interesting article by @Saraita101 on what is becoming one of the geographical oddities of the broader European space, - a kind of St Martin or Campione d'Italia or Büsingen writ large - Northern Ireland
The main take away is that NI's voting patterns and ethnic makeup are changing radically. That, for the UK union, is damaging, but not fatal.
2
It is clear that many NI people are much more comfortable with a both or neither identity: being Irish presents less of an issue for young unionists.
However, there is one fact that really overwhelms all and has not been addressed.
3
Brexit.
This stems from the massive strategic mistake that the major unionist parties made in either backing the Brexit vote or switching to the Brexit experiment after the ref had been won.
4
Unionism is now politically and culturally tied to Brexit.
This matters because Brexit - insular, reactionary, europhobic, repressive, denying opportunity - is not what young voters of all stripes want.
5
As England continues to sink into the Brexit mud, with human excrement on the beach as the metaphor, and Scotland eyes the exit door, and Brexit Britain become increasingly reactionary, populist are aligned with Putin and Trump, where does that leave pól. unionism?
6
Remember that NI will be spared the worst of Brexit thanks to the protocol (#thankEU).
But as GB revenues and trade continue to decline, financial support for NI will drop.
The comparison with Ireland will be stark.
7
Brexit has disturbed the equilibrium of everything in the UK.
It will be richly ironic if it is the UK, and not Europe, than breaks up owing to the British Brexit vote.
Ends.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is all so Brexitist. When Europeans say they don't want to give the UK exceptionalist treatment, then blame their nationality, blame irrationality.
We made mistakes with previous accessions. If the UK can't protect fundamental rights and commit to European values before accession, why would it do so afterwards?
If one picture could sum up the problems in mentality that led to Brexit, then I would nominate this one:
The Yalta Conference.
A 🧵
This is the start of the settlement of the end of WWII. The leaders of the major allied powers gathered together in 1943 and began to discuss the aftermath of the war, discussions that would lead, among many other things, the division of the European continent.
2
That in turn would of course lead to the cold war, NATO, the Council of Europe, and the formation of the European Union itself.
Essentially, Europe is a giant economy, regulator, source of investment and trade, tourist destination and source of incoming tourists, cultural partner of the UK, and regional giant.
2
There is no escaping that. Even when the giant is as well-meaning and solidly dependable as Europe, the slightest movement can have impact on the UK beyond its impact at home.
Not only is rejoin exceptionalism bound to fail, it's becoming an attack on the actual fabric of Europe itself.
1
This talk of breaking of the four freedoms is the same as the Brexiters. But here they're basically like a child wanting to break a toy because they have to share.
2
Anyhow, for this self-styled "defender of freedom of movement", if we could break up the four freedoms, what if we were to not give Britons free movement as a result?
Tiny Kox, a Dutch politician who is the president of the Council of Europe’s parliamentary assembly, also told the Guardian the UK could end up like Russia if it just ignores court rulings, as the British government wants to give itself the ability to do.