Marius, "Third Founder of Rome," was Caesar's uncle.
Here is the most important speech of his career and how he nailed it:
Setup 1/5
Before he conquered the Cimbri or started the Roman Civil War,
Gaius Marius was an obscure provincial
BUT, at age 50, the PEOPLE elected him consul (his first time)
(Marius: first "new man" in >30 years)
...In anger at the ESTABLISHMENT elites of Rome
Marius:
2/5 Anti-Establishment Anger? Why?
-Senators getting rich on bribes and contracts from foreign rulers
-Wealth inequality skyrocketing
-Rome losing in winnable wars due to military incompetence
-Elites avoiding army service
-Prefer lavish parties (~"squid ink pasta")
3/5 Marius gets elected w/ promise:
"I will win the [YEARS LONG] war against Jugurtha. Fast."
Then, his populist friends ("tribunes") call a plebiscite to appoint Marius as General
(plebiscite = mass vote)
The Senate protests! "That's our job!"
The people overrule them.
4/5 Senate backs down.
They say, "Fine. But you have to recruit your own soldiers."
They are thinking:
HA! Drafting soldiers will make Marius UNPOPULAR.
Army recruitment has been hard: Rome exhausted, morale low.
Setup 5/5
Marius says, "Recruit my own troops? No problem."
He calls the Populus to an assembly (a "contio")
Gives THIS SPEECH, to ask men to fight for him.
He has made a big bet.
If he fails, his career is over.
If he succeeds, he leads them to fight Jugurtha in Numidia.
1). Set up the groups: Me, You, Them.
Limit it to 3 = keep it simple.
Marius' main goal in the speech: to convert "You" and "Me" into "Us"
He does this gradually.
2). Portray yourself in simple contrast to others
A Strategy focused on ethos (character): the MOST persuasive tool.
The message below, for example:
Others (Establishment) can afford to lose.
GAIUS MARIUS has everything on the line,
(therefore has higher motivation to win)
3). Establish Competence
Marius does this early and often in his speech.
You should too.
Competence (Greek, aretē) is a key ingredient of ethos, according to Aristotle.
The Nobles, with all their Greek learning, are more like the Greeks
(Who we conquered)
You and I lack Greek. We are the true Romans.
6). Cement that bridge with a narrative
Pick a story that appeals to deeply held beliefs and identities:
"I am a fighter, and I lead by example. I am like your ancestors who conquered. Don't be like the nobles who laugh at you. Be like your ancestors."
7). Build contempt for the sort of people who refuse what you are about to request:
Elevate your audience's status by comparison
(IF they join you)
= "You're better than those nobles. You're going to prove it by your actions."
8) Spend a few words at the end delivering the actual proposal.
The army needs your help, it will be pretty easy to win. It's worth the risk.
(seems like an afterthought)
Message:
"You aren't the sort of people who need convincing"
(actually, the persuasion is already done)
Result:
Thousands sign up to Make Rome Great Again
Especially from among the poor.
Here is a painting of the victory procession (triumph)
Marius leads Jugurtha in chains:
By Tiepolo, in the Met in NYC:
Summary:
1) Groups 2) Contrast 3) Competence 4) Attack by defending 5) Bridges (Connected terms) 6) Cement with Narrative 7) Contempt/laughter for those who "don't" 8) Deliver proposal
Steps YOU can use when you want to persuade people to join
Gaius Marius Style.
If you enjoyed this, Retweet the first in thread!
Follow for more.
ALSO:
Cost of Glory is running a men's retreat
in ROME
Had a last minute cancellation, so a slot has opened up.
Cato never wore a crown, yet corrupt Roman officials TREMBLED at his name.
Rome’s most unyielding senator revealed a paradox of power that’s been hiding in plain sight for 2,000 years... 🧵
1. Make disagreeable choices with conviction
While Roman senators wore purple-trimmed togas to flaunt status, Cato entered the Senate with simplicity, dressed in a plain tunic.
When Caesar offered him a lucrative provincial post to get him out of Rome, he refused.
Cato did not budge, his statements held true integrity.
Even his enemies had to admit it: Cato could not be bought.
When both Caesar and Pompey tried to draw him into political alliance through family marriage offers, he rejected them. Every refusal amplified his independence.
2. Stand firm in the face of mockery
The Roman elite mocked Cato for his simple lifestyle and stubborn principles.
Plutarch records that Cato never responded, he simply kept living the same way. This unnerved his rivals.
Caesar even wrote a pamphlet titled "Anti-Cato", an entire essay meant to discredit him. That’s how much his integrity stung.
In 54 BC, Caesar faced impossible odds in Britain.
His response revealed 3 principles that can separate a world historical conqueror from a forgotten also-ran... 🧵
1: Adaptability wins. Be the Fox.
Caesar's legions were struggling against British charioteers who were riding up and down the field around like Indo-European warlords. (They used effective hit-and-run tactics). So, Caesar didn't stick to Roman doctrine. Instead, he innovated.
His heavy infantry was outmaneuvered, so he adapted his cavalry tactics:
He ordered them to fight in loose formation, to maintain gaps between riders, thereby dispersing the momentum of the chariots in useless pass-throughs. It's kind of wu-wei.
Then, his enemies refused open battle.
He changed his strategy:
- Burned villages in "King" Cassivellaunus's territory.
- Destroyed British grain fields that were ready for harvest.
They eventually came out to fight, and exposed themselves to defeats on the battlefield.
Great leaders evolve fast (and Caesar was faster than most)
2: Information Gluttony
Before landing, Caesar meticulously gathered intelligence about Britain's geography, tribes, and politics.
But then, he kept gathering intel after arriving. He discovered, for instance, that the Britons practiced family wife swapping, a fact which your average grug might consider just weird and useless, but you never know when that kind of information might come in handy. Caesar loved the details.
He loved studying their technology too: besides the chariots, he was particularly struck by a special kind of light raft the Britons used to navigate rivers. This technology proved decisive later in the Civil War, when a historic flood crippled supply lines during the Battle of Ilerda.
Caesar also learned about the family feuds of the various tribes in the coalition opposing him. It wasn't gossip, it was crucial intel.
When British tribes united under Cassivellaunus, Caesar knew their weaknesses and internal rivalries. This knowledge proved decisive: