We are now ten minutes away from the release of opinions. With 27 cases left, we are getting tantalizingly close to some big ticket cases dealing with loan forgiveness case, college admissions, free speech etc. jonathanturley.org/2022/10/03/fro…
Here we go . . .
...We have the first opinion: Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski. It is 7-2 and written by Justice Jackson. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...While many have portrayed this as a hopelessly divided court, it is yet another near unanimous decision. The Court rules that nursing home residents can go to court under the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act to litigate their rights.
...We have one of my favorites! Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products. Justice Kagan wrote for a unanimous court. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...The court remanded to apply a different standard -- a win for Jack Daniels and a blow to parody. Kagan declared that VIP cannot claim that the use of the image is noncommercial "just because it parodies, or otherwise comments on, another's products."
...We now have Dubin v. United States written by Justice Sotomayor with another remand. The case presented the question of whether a person commits aggravated identity theft any time they mention or otherwise recite someone else's name while committing a predicate… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
...The Court interprets "use" as qualifying as "in relation to" the predicate offense if the use relates to the core elements of what makes the conduct criminal. Another unanimous decision with only one concurrence in the judgment.
...Next up: Allen v. Milligan. Since this is by the Chief, it might be the last. This is one of the big voting rights cases. Question: Whether the state of Alabama’s 2021 redistricting plan for its seven seats in the United States House of Representatives violated Section 2 of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
...The Court rules with the lower court that there was a reasonable likelihood of success in the challenge that Alabama's congressional maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...Again, the critics may be disappointed in the lack of rigid ideological division. Roberts rules with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson -- and Kavanaugh in parts.
The Supreme Court may have put a dent in announced plans of Democratic politicians to arrest ICE officers and unleash sweeping prosecutions once they retake power. The Court just reversed the Second Circuit, holding that a Vermont officer had immunity in a protester's injury...
...In Zorn v. Linton, the Court voted 6-3 that officers are generally shielded from civil liability unless prior case law put the unlawfulness of an action "beyond debate." While a civil case, the Court has shown the same deference in criminal cases...
...The expectation is that civil and criminal cases will be filed against ICE and other federal law enforcement officers. Indeed, some politicians have insisted on barring masks to facilitate such lawsuits or prosecutions.
For a No Kings guy, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey sure seems to have a royal problem. Frey claimed on MS NOW that President Donald Trump could simply hire more TSA agents rather than deploy ICE officers. Yet, that would be done without congressional approval and appropriations...
...The MS NOW host did not correct the disinformation. It is telling that Democrats are opposing the effort to relieve the congestion at airports. Rep. James Walkinshaw (D-VA) appeared to welcome the chaos and "pain" caused to citizens at the airports as leverage for a deal...
...Democratic House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries went as far as to predict that ICE officers may "brutalize or in some instances, kill" people at airports...
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul is asking "high net worth" taxpayers to "go down to Palm Beach and see who you can bring back home" "to support the generous social programs we have in our state." There is another novel approach: change your policies to make people want to come back...
...The reason they are done in Florida is that the state has maintained low taxes as well as high-performing schools and services. Rather than put your hopes on peer pressure, try good policies and see what happens...
...New York Democrats are only the latest example of reaching the point where "you run out of other people's money." Yet, in New York, socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani is demanding tax hikes and a $30 minimum wage. jonathanturley.org/2026/02/19/mam…
Judge James Boasberg has another controversial decision in throwing out a duly issued grand jury subpoena of Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Boasberg declared that “There is abundant evidence that the subpoenas’ dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell."...
...I have been skeptical of the basis and motivation of the criminal investigation into Powell. However, Boasberg could face serious appellate questions over his basis to toss out a valid subpoena based entirely on his view of the underlying criminal investigation...
...This is not something that courts can take judicial notice over the lack of criminal conduct. The subpoena is part of an investigation into such conduct. This is a very rare such order at this stage in an investigation and could raise difficult appellate issues.
The Judicial Conference has released a new policy that could materially alter the character of the federal courts, allowing judges to comment on what they deem “illegitimate forms of criticism and attacks.” It is not just injudicious, it is dangerous... jonathanturley.org/2026/02/18/rul…
...The added freedom afforded to judges to engage in commentary will do little to change the debate. It may, however, greatly erode the trust in what was once considered “our least dangerous branch.”
...Given increasingly injudicious comments, one would think that Chief Justice John Roberts and the Judicial Conference would seek to tighten, not loosen, the limits on judicial commentary. I am not suggesting that these past statements would be viewed as acceptable under the new rules. However, I fail to understand, in light of such controversial statements, the Conference elected to relax the rules at this time.
The Clintons are again suggesting that they might not agree to a deposition after previously yielding to the threat of a contempt vote. Today, Bill Clinton declared on X that "I will not sit idly as they use me as a prop in a closed-door kangaroo court"...jonathanturley.org/2026/01/14/now…
...Clinton is not being asked to "sit idly by" but to sit for a deposition like other citizens. His posting suggests that he is again opposed to compliance after a bipartisan vote was again delayed by the earlier concession...
...The reason for these depositions is that they can gain greater depth in questioning. This is vintage Clinton in delaying and evading accountability. For decades, they have gamed the system with such tactics...