We are now ten minutes away from the release of opinions. With 27 cases left, we are getting tantalizingly close to some big ticket cases dealing with loan forgiveness case, college admissions, free speech etc. jonathanturley.org/2022/10/03/fro…
Here we go . . .
...We have the first opinion: Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski. It is 7-2 and written by Justice Jackson. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...While many have portrayed this as a hopelessly divided court, it is yet another near unanimous decision. The Court rules that nursing home residents can go to court under the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act to litigate their rights.
...We have one of my favorites! Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products. Justice Kagan wrote for a unanimous court. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...The court remanded to apply a different standard -- a win for Jack Daniels and a blow to parody. Kagan declared that VIP cannot claim that the use of the image is noncommercial "just because it parodies, or otherwise comments on, another's products."
...We now have Dubin v. United States written by Justice Sotomayor with another remand. The case presented the question of whether a person commits aggravated identity theft any time they mention or otherwise recite someone else's name while committing a predicate… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
...The Court interprets "use" as qualifying as "in relation to" the predicate offense if the use relates to the core elements of what makes the conduct criminal. Another unanimous decision with only one concurrence in the judgment.
...Next up: Allen v. Milligan. Since this is by the Chief, it might be the last. This is one of the big voting rights cases. Question: Whether the state of Alabama’s 2021 redistricting plan for its seven seats in the United States House of Representatives violated Section 2 of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
...The Court rules with the lower court that there was a reasonable likelihood of success in the challenge that Alabama's congressional maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...Again, the critics may be disappointed in the lack of rigid ideological division. Roberts rules with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson -- and Kavanaugh in parts.
I recently wrote on Marc Elias responding to the Virginia Supreme Court's adverse opinion on gerrymandering by reminding citizens that they can eliminate the entire Virginia government. Elias cannot understand why I and others find his posting notable...jonathanturley.org/2026/05/13/dem…
...He notes that he is merely quoting the Constitution after all. It is like responding to an adverse trade ruling by the WTO by quoting Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 on the ability of Congress to declare war. It is a rather extreme measure to invoke...tinyurl.com/5dhz5eur
...The posting came as Democrats pushed to sack-and-pack the Virginia Supreme Court, reminding people that they could go even further in taking down part or all of the Virginia government for being denied the right to effectively eliminate all Republican representations in the purple state... jonathanturley.org/2026/05/10/gut…
The collective primal scream session is continuing over the decision of the Virginia Supreme Court that Democrats violated the Constitution in the gerrymandering vote. Yet, Sen. Tim Kaine offered a moment of unintended levity when he questioned why the Court waited so long...
...Kaine questioned why the Court did not rule earlier. However, it was the Democrats who insisted on the Court waiting. The Court had a whole section on how the Commonwealth insisted on the delay...
...Kaine previously made headlines by denouncing those who believe in natural law and God-given rights as little better than Iranian mullahs. Here, Kaine is criticizing a court for not explaining a delay that his party demanded and the court addressed.jonathanturley.org/2025/09/08/the…
...Justice Alito (as anticipated) wrote the majority opinion, ruling that the 2024 map mandating a second majority-black district, was "an unconstitutional racial gerrymander."...
...From Alito: "Correctly understood, Section 2 does not impose liability at odds with the Constitution, and it should not have imposed liability on Louisiana for its 2022 map. Compliance with Section 2 thus could not justify the State's use of race-based redistricting here."
Todd Blanche is speaking now and says that there are other cases similar to the Comey indictment where guilty pleas have been entered or cases are going to trial...
...Director Kash Patel just confirmed that this has been investigated for almost a year. He emphasized that career employees found this evidence and a grand jury returned this true bill. He noted that the grand jury was made aware that Comey withdrew the posting and apologized. That is an interesting fact since it will be raised in any trial, if this makes it to a trial.
...Blanche is emphasizing that this is just one example that the Justice Department will not take threats lightly. Blanche says that they will prove intent with witnesses and other conventional evidence...
James Comey has reportedly been indicted for a second time. Last September, he was charged with lying to Congress over leaks to the press. The case was then dismissed by a federal judge who found that the interim US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia had been improperly appointed.
...Late last year, the first indictment was dismissed over the challenged status of the acting United States Attorney. The Administration may now have cured that deficiency. The original indictment was disjointed due to the rejection of one count. It is not clear what the array of charges may be and whether it is again focusing on false statements under 18 U.S.C. 1001. jonathanturley.org/2025/11/25/try…
...There has been a suggestion in early reporting that Comey might be charged over his image of shells spelling 86 47. That would be a tough case given the likely First Amendment challenge that the statement (even if it had a lethal meaning) was still protected speech...
At the DOJ presser, Acting AG Todd Blanche just said the Cole Allen said that this was the floor above the ballroom with "hundreds of agents" between him and the President of the United States...
...He is pushing back on the notion that there was a security failure. He confirmed three charges: attempted assassination of the President (up to life imprisonment); interstate transport of a firearm (up to 10 years); discharge of the firearm in a crime (5 years)...
...US Attorney Jeanine Pirro confirmed, as expected, that there will be additional charges but that "it is clear that this was an attempted assassination of the President of the United States." She notes that Cole Allen made a reservation shortly after Trump announced that he would attempt the dinner...