We are now ten minutes away from the release of opinions. With 27 cases left, we are getting tantalizingly close to some big ticket cases dealing with loan forgiveness case, college admissions, free speech etc. jonathanturley.org/2022/10/03/fro…
Here we go . . .
...We have the first opinion: Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski. It is 7-2 and written by Justice Jackson. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...While many have portrayed this as a hopelessly divided court, it is yet another near unanimous decision. The Court rules that nursing home residents can go to court under the Federal Nursing Home Reform Act to litigate their rights.
...We have one of my favorites! Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products. Justice Kagan wrote for a unanimous court. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...The court remanded to apply a different standard -- a win for Jack Daniels and a blow to parody. Kagan declared that VIP cannot claim that the use of the image is noncommercial "just because it parodies, or otherwise comments on, another's products."
...We now have Dubin v. United States written by Justice Sotomayor with another remand. The case presented the question of whether a person commits aggravated identity theft any time they mention or otherwise recite someone else's name while committing a predicate… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
...The Court interprets "use" as qualifying as "in relation to" the predicate offense if the use relates to the core elements of what makes the conduct criminal. Another unanimous decision with only one concurrence in the judgment.
...Next up: Allen v. Milligan. Since this is by the Chief, it might be the last. This is one of the big voting rights cases. Question: Whether the state of Alabama’s 2021 redistricting plan for its seven seats in the United States House of Representatives violated Section 2 of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
...The Court rules with the lower court that there was a reasonable likelihood of success in the challenge that Alabama's congressional maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf…
...Again, the critics may be disappointed in the lack of rigid ideological division. Roberts rules with Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson -- and Kavanaugh in parts.
The Clintons are again suggesting that they might not agree to a deposition after previously yielding to the threat of a contempt vote. Today, Bill Clinton declared on X that "I will not sit idly as they use me as a prop in a closed-door kangaroo court"...jonathanturley.org/2026/01/14/now…
...Clinton is not being asked to "sit idly by" but to sit for a deposition like other citizens. His posting suggests that he is again opposed to compliance after a bipartisan vote was again delayed by the earlier concession...
...The reason for these depositions is that they can gain greater depth in questioning. This is vintage Clinton in delaying and evading accountability. For decades, they have gamed the system with such tactics...
The decision of the federal court to reject the effort to enjoin the immigration operations means that Attorney General Keith Ellison could not come up with a single cognizable claim of illegality to shoulder this burden...
...Now that a Biden appointee judge has rejected this meritless effort, will Gov. Walz, Attorney General Ellison, and Mayor Frey finally come clean and admit that these operations are lawful? One can disagree with them, but they are solidly within federal law...
...Instead, Ellison has been spreading clearly false information like claiming that the FACE Act only applies to abortion clinics and not places of worship. jonathanturley.org/2026/01/20/thi…
Gov. Walz is again inflaming the mob. He is effectively declaring this to be the murder of a citizen who had a permit to carry this weapon. He is saying that the state not the federal government will control the investigation. He does not have that authority...
...The state can clearly have a parallel investigation and the federal government can do a joint investigation. However, he cannot dictate how or who will conduct the investigation...
...With thousands in the streets, Walz just did all that he could to give them license for their rage. Most of us would never call this a lawful or unlawful shooting based on one videotape...
Frey is again denouncing the officers in the latest shooting before any investigation into the shooting. Gov. Walz preceded him. Frey just said "your children will ask you what side you are on" and "what did you do?" Those words will be taken as a license for escalating these confrontations...
...Many of us have watched this videotape. The view of the hands of the suspect are not clear. We hear the shoot followed by a series of shots. We need to know if the suspect had pulled the gun or the reason for the officers to use lethal force. That would not seem an unreasonable expectation before public condemnations from the governor and the mayor...
...Rachel Sayre, Minneapolis Emergency Management Director, just said that the federal government is terrorizing the city...
Now in control, Virginia Democrats have pursued a radical agenda from a host of new taxes to rent control measures. jonathanturley.org/2026/01/23/wit… Now they are threatening one of the oldest institutions, the Virginia Military Institute, over DEI policies... foxnews.com/us/virginia-de…
...After running as a moderate, Gov. Abigail Spanberger has moved to reverse efforts to moderate Virginia universities, including the appointment of former Gov. Ralph Northam to the VMI board...
...I have spoken at VMI, , which is a unique educational institution that has produced some of our greatest leaders, including Gen. George Marshall. It now appears in the crosshairs of a far-left agenda.jonathanturley.org/2025/10/02/the…
Rep. Onder just body slammed Smith on his effort to give Trump's legal team little time to read millions of pages of documents. Smith's response was that he wanted to be sure that Trump got a speedy trial, even though the Trump team was trying to slow down the trial to review his document dump...
...It was a strikingly dishonest moment from Smith, who was clearly pushing for a trial before the election in the view of many of us. Smith insisted that the speedy trial is a public right, but it is not a right that has seemed to motivate him in the past in seeking such a rushed schedule...
...Smith also sought to curtail Trump's usual right to appeal in this mad rush...