Stefan Bajčetić possesses all the necessary tools to become a top player in a position where Liverpool’s squad is most dire.
To a large extent, whether he will reach his potential is dependent on his body.
Thread!
Bajčetić’s profile is a highly intriguing one. At age 18, he’s already an excellent dueler, tackler, and ball winner at PL level, while showing glimpses of top press resistance, agility, game intelligence, composure, versatility, ball-striking and a solid passing range.
He stood out for his good performances in a highly dysfunctional Liverpool team, before picking up a “stress response” injury in his adductor – most likely caused by the vast increase in his playing time & intensity.
Indeed, his development is largely dependent on his body.
Bajčetić’s body composition is unique: he has a relatively long upper body, which lowers his centre of gravity & thus increases his balance. In general, he has excellent control over his body and can twist & turn easily.
He also plays the game in an unusual posture. He constantly plays in a front-footed, slightly crouched manner, with his upper body forward and down, similarly to Pedri. This allows him to change body angles quickly, which helps his press resistance & retention in tight spaces.
In addition, he has oddly flexible, stretchy legs, which help him dangle his body around various angles to make tackles.
The leg flexibility also allows him to take a lot of short strides with ease, which enables him to manipulate the ball, timing & the opposition. Moreover, it helps him to ride challenges & skip away from incoming contact, while maintaining balance.
The issue is that Bajčetić’s body in its current form is still rather fragile – a problem which is exacerbated by his playing style. Indeed, playing in a crouched manner & twisting/turning frequently is much more stressful for the body than straight-line running.
The intensity of Liverpool’s tactical approach and Bajčetić’s natural play-style in combination with his still rather immature body means he might be prone to “stress injuries” and the like.
However, as he ages, his body matures, and he puts on muscle in his legs, hips and core,
his body composition/genetic physical traits will be an advantage, rather than a frailty, especially with regard to duel-winning and agility.
Bajčetić has the right profile and potential to become a starter for Liverpool in the future, but he is still raw mentally and, in particular, physically, so patience is required.
However, chances are: his peak will be well worth the wait. ⭐️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Messi not returning to Barcelona hurts massively on a romantic level, but not at a sporting one.
In fact, it may be best for both parties that Messi leaves European football at this time.
(Short thread)
Everyone with a football heart wanted Messi to return to Barcelona. His last stint in Europe being with PSG simply doesn’t feel right. But when considering Barça’s current tactics, playstyle/intent & finances, it may be for the best that Messi goes elsewhere.
Barça have a very young squad filled with players who are still developing and mastering their game. They have also managed just last season to get back to a highly competitive sporting level in the post-Bartomeu, post-Messi era - no easy feat.
Liverpool’s recent defensive woes analysed. Is the 3-2-2-3 to blame?
Klopp’s side has now played six games in their new system and conceded 10 goals – far too many for a team of their quality.
What is causing this? Is the system at fault?
Tactical analysis thread!
Since moving to the new 3-2-2-3 system, Liverpool are shipping 1.67 goals per game, which, despite the small sample size, is a worrying trend that warrants analysis.
I’ve seen multiple people on this platform complain that...
Liverpool’s formation change is responsible for the poor defensive record.
I strongly disagree with this. In fact, I believe the Reds’ rest defence is now much improved & that the team will see better defensive results in the long run.
Having played four games in a new system, the Reds look revitalized. But what exactly has changed and how has it made Liverpool better? And what can still be improved?
Tactical Analysis Thread!
Over the years, Klopp’s Liverpool have become synonymous with the 4-3-3; specifically, a 4-3-3 with two attacking full backs, a system with which they won all of the biggest titles available to them.
But times change and football evolves.
Nowadays, the best teams in England and indeed the world, no longer play with two attacking full backs. In fact, Arsenal and Man City, the arguably two most tactically astute teams in Europe, most often keep both of their full backs back – also in a 3-2-2-3 shape.