🧵 6 years ago today, I was carrying out a few last minute tasks as part of @jeremycorbyn’s #GE2017 social media team before hunkering down at Southside, Victoria Street (Labour HQ) waiting for the exit poll, with a strange sense of euphoria. (1/7)
Just a few weeks earlier, we’d been 20-25 points down in the polls & hadn’t been given a chance. The Tories (& some on our own side, it seems) we’re rubbing their hands at the thought of teaching us socialist oiks a lesson, to prise our hands off the levers of power. (2/7)
Except it didn’t quite work out like that. Week after week of that election campaign, we drew the Tories closer. The excitement of eating into their lead was like nothing I’ve ever experienced. We were turning the tables & making people eat their words. (3/7)
And then the roar as the exit poll broke, and the first results came in and that strange mixture, for the rest of the night and morning, of pride and disappointment in equal measure. Next door, where the permanent staff sat around screens, deathly quiet, a sense of shock. (4/7)
It was only months & years later we realised that we’d been swimming against a tide down there in Victoria Street. That those people had actively been sabotaging the election, while we had been expending every drop of energy we had for the cause. (5/7)
But at the time, none of that mattered. There was a sense of pride, not just amongst the people in Corbyn’s team, in that building, but in the fact that we’d brought in & reflected a much wider movement outside, and this was theirs, to savour. (6/7)
People will say it wasn’t a win. That we lost. We know that, of course we do. And to be so close was agonising, partly because we knew the impact that this loss would have. But what couldn’t be taken away, was that we’d made history, all of us. Heady days, indeed. ✊ (7/7)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[thread 🧵] I wrote this four years ago today, before the 2019 General Election defeat, before Starmer & before the collapse of the left. I think the opportunity to do any of this within Labour has gone, but we can & should take this forward into whatever we do next: (1/10)
“So many problems the Labour left are facing right now could have been anticipated & to a large extent avoided by two things: (2/10)
(1) Standing up to thugs & bullies in the movement. It’s not surprising that, in a party of 600,000 we’re going to get some people who think they can get their way by threats, passive aggressive behaviour and manipulation. (3/10)
[thread 🧵] People might wonder why I am returning to the antisemitism allegations. Isn’t that old news, aren’t they yesterday’s battles? Isn’t it better to ignore it, stop giving it the oxygen of publicity? Well no. And I’ll tell you why it matters. (1/9)
There’s this assumption that accusations of antisemitism is a Labour Party issue. That’s naive. Firstly, the right, whether in the party or not, have found a perfect weapon to silence, intimidate & ultimately defeat their opponents. They are unlikely to give that up. (2/9)
Why is it so effective? Precisely because of the confused & inadequate response from key sections of the left, across our movement. The lack of a confident, effective response, based on solidarity & integrity has laid out the red carpet for further attacks. (3/9)
[thread 🧵] There’s a lot of talk about rebuilding on the left, but much of it seems to be underpinned by a magical thinking that misunderstands how organisation is built, the lessons of the recent past & how we avoid going back to the traditional cul-de-sacs of the left. (1/15)
These are hard things to navigate, but unless we are to be frozen by paralysis, we need to address them & not be scared of difficult conversations & debates. That’s the only way we’ll move forward after the defeats we’ve suffered & attacks we continue to endure. (2/15)
To begin, there has to be an acceptance that we can’t just recreate what happened under @jeremycorbyn. I think most people do accept that those days are gone. And the likelihood of those conditions somehow being replicated are virtually nil, especially within @UKLabour. (3/15)
[thread 🧵] A fairly standard response to those of us who might object to the pomp & ceremony of Jubilees, Royal Weddings & Coronations is that it’s purely ceremonial, a bit of harmless nostalgia. Chill out, they say, a King or a Queen - in 2020’s Britain - has no power. (1/14)
Is that really true? It’s worth having a look, because it’s complicated. Superficially, it may seem that when Charles becomes King on Saturday, he just takes on a ceremonial role - lending some historical flavour to our Parliamentary democracy, but there’s more to it. (2/14)
The Monarch’s role in our strange, archaic political system is actually far more than just a symbolic one. In reality, it functions as a kind of security blanket for the establishment, ensuring that our democracy doesn’t get too carried away with the will of the people. (3/14)
[thread 🧵] I’m pretty sure the deployment of antisemitism allegations against the British left in the period from 2015 onwards will be discussed by historians in the future. And unless history also goes down the sewer, it’ll be discussed more objectively than the present. (1/14)
Apart from wading through the distortions & the political game-playing to establish the facts, something else they will surely have to consider is what it’s done to our political culture. I want to explain what I mean by that, because it’s important for the left too. (2/14)
Everything I say is entirely separate from the battle against antisemitism in real life - which is serious & must be combated through political opposition & most importantly, anti-racist education. The tragedy about its weaponisation is how that work has been relegated. (3/14)
Just watch & listen to @Keir_Starmer here because I think it’s important that we understand how political narratives are established. I have been thinking a lot about this & about how the big lie about @jeremycorbyn’s antisemitism sticks. (1/10)
Firstly, he’s asked about how he feels about essentially betraying someone he called a friend not long ago. Starmer simply ignores this questioning from @BethRigby, talking over her & getting quite animated. (2/10)
But notice what he does next.
Without even trying to link to that question, or relating it to the motion that was placed before the NEC (all about Corbyn’s electoral failure), he moves onto antisemitism. That’s called elision - merging unconnected ideas. (3/10)