NEW: NHS England has confirmed puberty blockers for young people with gender incongruence will only be administered as part of clinical research. It comes as NHSE publishes the service specification that will guide the new gender services that will replace the Tavistock’s GIDS
NHSE says it will propose: “outside of a research setting, puberty suppressing hormones should not be routinely commissioned for children and adolescents who have gender incongruence/dysphoria.” tinyurl.com/35zc29zs
The interim service spec is v similar to the draft published in Oct 2022, with primary intervention for YPs being psychosocial & psychological support. The main objective is 'to alleviate distress associated with gender incongruence and promote the individual’s... wellbeing.’
The doc acknowledges that there will be a range of pathways suitable for YP and a range of outcomes. It repeats assertion from the draft that, ‘The clinical approach should be mindful that this [experience of gender incongruence/dysphoria] may be a transient phase.’
The relationship between a young person’s gender incongruence and any other co-existing mental health, neurodevelopmental or personal complexities, will be carefully explored and an individualised care plan developed for each YP. Gone is any talk of a time limited assessment
But, all children and young people will receive ‘a standardised comprehensive assessment’ – addressing the findings from both the CQC and Dr Cass that GIDS assessments could vary widely, depending on the individual clinicians conducting them.
The service specification is cautious on social transition – defined by NHSE as presenting ‘in public fully with a gender identity different to that of their natal sex in all forms and aspects of their daily lives.’
The doc says that ‘While there are different views on the benefits versus the harms of early social transition, it is important to acknowledge that it is not a neutral act.’ Clinicians shd discuss with young people and their families ‘the risks and benefits of social transition.’
For younger, pre-pubescent children, the general clinical approach will be therapeutic. Often, the document says, children will be most appropriately supported by local services – ‘ with or without consultation support from the Specialist Service.'
The new gender services will undertake continuous data collection and audit, something found to be lacking in the past. New services will also be underpinned by ‘robust safeguarding frameworks.’
As in draft doc, NHSE ‘strongly discourages’ families from sourcing puberty blockers or hormones from unregulated sources or on-line providers that aren't regulated by UK regulatory bodies. But, there's no longer a call for mandatory safeguarding reporting in these circumstances.
And, finally, on staffing - the specification repeats Dr Cass’s recommendation that the new services must be staffed by professionals with a wider range of expertise, including: psychological, mental and physical health, safeguarding, gender identity development (cont...)
management of risk-taking behaviours, trauma informed approaches, family work/family therapy, CBT, Neurodevelopment disorders including learning disability and autism spectrum conditions, expertise to support Looked After children.
Here's the full doc: tinyurl.com/2fve25f5
END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(🧵As Mermaids is trending, perhaps worth pointing out: It has never been secret that they were allowed to directly refer to Gids. So cld other third sector groups. But Tavistock emails suggest this first seems to have happened in 2014, not 2016 with new service specification.
We’ve known since 2019 of direct emails between Susie Green and gids director Polly Carmichael and other board level members of Tavistock Trust: these were part of Mermaids’ data breach in 2019. Made it surprising when Tavistock said they didn’t have anything. From my book:
Those emails also showed that Mermaids wanted changes to clinical practice at gids. It’s less clear what the result was:
Hi @Waterstones, just wondered if you knew when Time to Think will start arriving in your stores? It’s just you’ve had hundreds & hundreds of copies in your warehouse for weeks, but people can’t currently buy one in Wales, all of Surrey, or most of the UK’s major cities🧵
None showing in your Manchester, Birmingham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Bristol or Oxford stores. In London, unlike all other Sunday Times bestsellers of the past fortnight (+plenty of others), which are in majority of your 30+ London stores, Time to Think is in less than 20%.
It's baffling because having ordered many, many more than your initial order (which is great, thank you), people haven't been able to buy the books in your stores, which is a bit frustrating for an author. And other titles don't seem affected
Many people have sent kind messages over the last 24 hours about mine and others’ reporting of GIDS. Thank you. To echo the sentiments of my former colleague Deb, though, our coverage has really just been about asking the same questions of GIDS as other NHS services…
1) What is the evidence base for this treatment? 2) Is the treatment on offer working for everyone? 3) Are the clinical and safeguarding concerns raised by staff being listened to? And how is the organisation responding to them?
Our first film in 2019 looked at the evidence base being medical interventions for young people with gender dysphoria. bbc.co.uk/news/health-49…
NEW: The High Court will hear a challenge to the current treatment provided by NHS gender identity clinics – for both young people and adults. Claimants argue waiting times for treatment and ‘other failures in trans healthcare services, are discriminatory and unlawful.’ 🧵1/9
The Good Law Project, along with trans-led organisation Gendered Intelligence, two adult claimants and two child claimants have been granted permission to take their case to Judicial Review. 2/9 goodlawproject.org/update/trans-h…
One area being challenged is use of a Multi-Professional Review Group to ensure that procedures for assessment and informed consent have been
properly followed in all Tavistock GIDS referrals for puberty blockers for children under 16. 3/9 england.nhs.uk/commissioning/…
NEW: A review of the governance of the Tavistock and Portman Trust, which is responsible for the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), has found 'multiple' issues and recommended leadership arrangements be strengthened. [1/10]🧵
The report's authors say that “the scale of the corporate governance issues we have identified across the Trust are multiple.” The external report is contained in this month’s board papers, which have now been removed from online. [2/10]
It argues that while the Board has strengths, there was a “lack of challenge and effective scrutiny of the executives by NEDs [Non-Executive Directors], and not enough evidence of holding to account." [3/10]
THREAD: The Court of Appeal has overturned a judgment handed down by the High Court that said under 16s were unlikely to be able to give informed consent to treatment with puberty blockers, and that each case should be heard by a court.
BBC copy here: bbc.co.uk/news/uk-585981…
The Tavistock and Portman Trust appealed the original judgement, saying the guidance given by the High Court ‘was wrong in law.’ Today, the Court of Appeal agreed that the original judgement went beyond the remit of the court and that ‘the claim for judicial review is dismissed.’
The ruling answered three questions:
Did the High Court approach the evidence appropriately?
Was the the Court right to have made the declaration [that under 16s cannot consent]?
Was the Court right to have given guidance?