As the only pollster questioning 2020 (the 42nd biggest spreader of 'election misinformation' on Twitter), we're the experts on this topic.
Watch the slow-motion trainwreck as voters wake up to fraud.
Video here:
January 2020, with the electorate riding high on a Trump economic wave, and the unknown virus of unspecified origins not yet upon us, most say elections are fair to voters, but not as much as you'd expect.
A majority of Democrats say no, most likely driven by @realDonaldTrump still being in office.
But Americans overwhelmingly said that the federal government does NOT have the consent of the govern, likely driven by a perennial, severe distaste for Congress.
April 2020 - The pandemic hits, and election printers everywhere are discretely stocking up on envelope-stuffing equipment, despite the fact that mass-mailing of unsolicited ballots was illegal at the time.
Nonetheless, a strong majority of favored mail-in ballots (COVID fear?)
But Americans had a sneaking suspicion that mail-in ballots would be exploited for fraud...
...Especially Republicans, and 94% of Trump strong supporters suspected mail-in ballots would lead to more voter fraud, again, just one month into the pandemic.
October 2020, with the election fast approaching, and philosophically, voters are split on whether voting is too easy or too hard.
And there's quite a bit of a party signal...
But the race signal is stronger, with Hispanic voters being most likely to say voting is too easy. Black voters roughly agree with white voters.
And voters pretty strongly agree that voters ID's don't discriminate.
But Democrats are still most concerned about disenfranchisement.
The election comes and goes, and in December, a good portion of voters thought that the court challenges had merit, but nowhere near a majority.
Most thought the court challenges were delay tactics, but even so, with very little time to investigate or research, over 4-in-10 voters thought the court challenges had merit.
73% of Republicans thought there was widespread fraud, but also 39% of Independents, and only 20% of Democrats.
February 2021 - A month after the Capitol Riot, and a few weeks after @JoeBiden entered office with the lowest approval record in our history.
One third said he didn't win fairly.
Our retrospective on mail-in voting wasn't very confidence-building. Just a year prior, 64% supported mail-in ballot, but only 52% said that it worked well.
"Election Deniers" was just being coined, and despite our Constitutionally protected 1st amendment right to free speech, 35% of voters wanted those who questioned the 2020 outcome to be PUNISHED.
68% of Biden Strong Approvers wanted election deniers punished.
April 2021, and we revisit some philosophical beliefs about elections. Notice the huge shift towards 'too easy?'
It was driven by Republicans, BTW.
Here's another, more important philosophical question, which is REALLY useful in understanding the opinions of the right vs left...
One Party is much less concerned about cheating.
We retested Photo IDs as well, and the spread narrowed, a LOT.
But here's the big one. We were extremely surprised by this outcome. 51% of voters said cheating affected the outcome of 2020.
In the summer of 2021, there was a lot of talk about election fraud and audits, and (only?) 55% of the electorate supported audits, in general.
Only 38% of Democrats, in principle, supported audits.
Pretty incredible.
...to be continued
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"As of September 2016, the Russian Foreign Service (SVR) had Democratic National Committee (DNC) information that President Obama and party leaders found the state of Secretary Clinton's health to be "extraordinarily alarming" and felt it could have "serious negative impact"
1/4
on her election prospects. Her health information was being kept in "strictest secrecy" and even close advisors were not being fully informed. The SVR possessed DNC communications that Clinton was suffering from "intensified psycho-emotional problems, including
2/4
uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness." Clinton was placed on a daily regimen of "heavy tranquilizers" and while afraid of losing, she remained "obsessed with a thirst for power." The SVR also had information that Clinton had "Type 2 diabetes, ischemic
3/4
"When Donald J. Trump shocked the world by defeating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election, the political establishment went into vicious overdrive. Within days of his election, the media began promoting a new narrative, soon to be known as the “Russia Hoax" 1/4
- that Russia had intervened to help Trump win. But behind the scenes, was something even more calculated unfolding between then-President Barack Obama and the defeated candidate, Hillary Clinton? To be clear, there is no public record of a meeting between Hillary Clinton ..
2/4
and President Obama in the weeks following the election. However, for years speculation has swirled about a quiet, off-the-books conversation - perhaps a lunch - held somewhere in the White House between Obama and Clinton. If such a meeting occurred, what was said could
3/4
"On Friday, director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard released “overwhelming evidence” that former president Barack Obama and other top Cabinet and Intelligence Community (I.C.) members conspired to “subvert the will of the American people”
1/4
after President Trump won the 2016 election. The newly declassified Russiagate documents show that Obama and other high-level officials allegedly did everything they could to “delegitimize President Trump’s victory” with false claims and “countless smears.”
2/4
According to Gabbard, the newly released documents further prove a conspiracy that would perpetrate a “years-long coup” against President Trump. She also stated that those involved reportedly hoped to destroy the mandate and legacy “bestowed upon him by the American people."
3/4
Wisconsin: Election Fraud, Conspiracy Theory No Longer
Corrupt government actors force citizens to sue them repeatedly in courts for embarrassing public records that they control. @PeterBernegger did this and attests to what those records show. Then critics go silent. 1/6
On our March 14th episode of REALITY CHECK, guest Peter Bernegger outlined the top findings of his 4600+ FOIA requests and court depositions of government officials have surfaced. It's bombshell stuff so set aside some viewing time. 2/6
Time Code 1-47:50 Smurfing. Peter and his team along with others like James O'Keeffe have tracked down election contribution law violations of both parties but primarily ActBlue. Congress has picked up their findings and is actively investigating.
Our National Likely Voters screen is party weighted D35, R33, 132 - we use it for all political questions.
Our National All Adults screen is party weighted D34, R29, I37 - we only use it for non-political topics.
Both work well. 1/4
Many are unaware of our important daily work for the worldwide financial markets. Our high value daily econometric data has (for 15+ yrs) powered proprietary models used by trading firms managing trillions worldwide. It has to be accurate every day or questions arrive instantly. 2/4 rasmussenreports.com/public_content…
Because our results are compared against the two other famous independent public consumer indices we get constant feedback allowing us to adjust or not adjust weighting or other survey methods. This informs our political survey metrics, the work you likely know us for. 3/4