Those documents can be further defined by whether they were produced on June 3, 2022, in response to DOJ's subpoena vs seized during the search warrant on August 8, 2022 (see the ending date of offense for each item in para 77):
TS: 10 subpoena, 11 SW
S: 9 SW
Unmarked: 1 SW
2/
Compare this with the total number seized.
Search (indictment para 75):
17 TS*
55 S
31 C
Subpoena (DOJ Aug 30 filing, link):
17 TS
16 S
5 C
Total classified:
34 TS (21 charged)
71 S (9 charged)
36 C (0 charged)
DOJ recovered 13 TS documents which weren't charged.
Why? For each of the charged documents, DOJ has received authority from the agency owning the information (para 21 lists CIA, DOD, NSA, NGA, NRO, DOE, and State/INR) to use the material in criminal proceedings.
4/
It's possible the remaining 13 were too sensitive: the risk to sources and methods and/or other damage to national security outweighed allowing their use and possible disclosure at trial.
So as you assess how damaging Trump's actions were, keep in mind it's probably worse.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's some bad info floating around about classified litigation. This post from @lawfareblog about the Classified Information Procedures Act is good. CIPA is designed to balance defendants' rights with the govt's need to keep classified info secure.
It looks just like the folder Trump put over a "landline telephone next to his bed, [which] has a blue light on it... so that it would keep the light down so he could sleep at night.”
You know, the one that his attorney just returned to you last month.
Suddenly getting a lot of this over the last couple of days - did something happen?
Here's an ex-FBI agent even Jim Jordan didn't want to testify yelling FIGHT ME like some twelve year old child on a playground.
Btw, his rt? A QAnon influencer who obtained and published internal FBI emails identifying more than a dozen FBI employees. Wonder where she got them.
Of those Jordan *did* interview, here's a retired FBI supervisory analyst's since-deleted older tweet (surprise, the internet is forever) suggesting the government send assassination teams to kill those officials that Durham didn't prosecute.
“But the work so far, the Republican says, has been ‘very much amateur hour,’ adding that airing this ‘stuff on live television would make us look like morons.’” rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
Wonder how the FBI views the counterintelligence issues of a “whistleblower” Special Agent giving an interview to a registered agent of the Russian govt. Did he even tell the FBI?
“Friend said in an interview with Russia Today that Jordan’s office had “attached’ him to Foster.”
I mean, this sounds not great.
“Mr. Friend also engaged with Russian propaganda outlets while he was an F.B.I. employee…including being quoted extensively in an article in Sputnik…and appearing for an interview with Russia Today.”
An astonishing article. In 20 years of working cases involving classified information, I never - not once - encountered prosecutors who wanted to get a search warrant and reluctant - even refusing! - agents. The other way around, sure.
The article points to a damning fear in the FBI stemming from political fear, not from fact.
“The FBI agents’ caution also was rooted in the fact that mistakes in prior probes of Hillary Clinton…had proved damaging to the FBI”
Really? Name one. I’ll wait.
“Some of those field agents wanted to shutter the criminal investigation altogether in early June, after Trump’s legal team asserted a diligent search had been conducted and all classified records had been turned over”