Pete Strzok Profile picture
Jun 9 5 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
As bad as it is, it's quite possible the indictment does not include the most sensitive documents recovered from MAL. 🧵

The indictment charges 31 distinct classified documents (para 77):

21 Top Secret
9 Secret
1 unmarked

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

1/
Those documents can be further defined by whether they were produced on June 3, 2022, in response to DOJ's subpoena vs seized during the search warrant on August 8, 2022 (see the ending date of offense for each item in para 77):

TS: 10 subpoena, 11 SW
S: 9 SW
Unmarked: 1 SW

2/ Image
Compare this with the total number seized.

Search (indictment para 75):
17 TS*
55 S
31 C

Subpoena (DOJ Aug 30 filing, link):
17 TS
16 S
5 C

Total classified:
34 TS (21 charged)
71 S (9 charged)
36 C (0 charged)

justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…

* DOJ claimed 18 TS in a 9/26 filing

3/
DOJ recovered 13 TS documents which weren't charged.

Why? For each of the charged documents, DOJ has received authority from the agency owning the information (para 21 lists CIA, DOD, NSA, NGA, NRO, DOE, and State/INR) to use the material in criminal proceedings.

4/ Image
It's possible the remaining 13 were too sensitive: the risk to sources and methods and/or other damage to national security outweighed allowing their use and possible disclosure at trial.

So as you assess how damaging Trump's actions were, keep in mind it's probably worse.

/end Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pete Strzok

Pete Strzok Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @petestrzok

Jun 8
There's some bad info floating around about classified litigation. This post from @lawfareblog about the Classified Information Procedures Act is good. CIPA is designed to balance defendants' rights with the govt's need to keep classified info secure.

lawfareblog.com/classified-inf…

1/
If you prefer a 🧵 to a blog, @BVanGrack (who is a former DOJ attorney with a lot of experience in classified litigation) has a great thread here:



CIPA adds litigation to a trial, and presents opportunities for defendants to slow things down.

2/
You may hear about various filings under CIPA Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 - things which aren't part of trials not involving classified info.

Detail about those sections and more from DOJ here:
justice.gov/archives/jm/cr…

CIPA itself here:
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?pat…

3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 14
Hey DOJ, looks like there's still an empty classified folder and FOUO document at the bar in the base of Trump Tower.

In New York City. Tonight, Tuesday March 14, 2023.

Wonder how it got there.

Wonder if the box it came out of is still there.

Wonder what else is in that box.
It looks just like the folder Trump put over a "landline telephone next to his bed, [which] has a blue light on it... so that it would keep the light down so he could sleep at night.”

You know, the one that his attorney just returned to you last month.

nbcnews.com/politics/donal…
Turns out it's been there and talked about since last November.

filthydreams.org/2022/11/07/wha…
Read 6 tweets
Mar 6
Suddenly getting a lot of this over the last couple of days - did something happen?
Here's an ex-FBI agent even Jim Jordan didn't want to testify yelling FIGHT ME like some twelve year old child on a playground.

Btw, his rt? A QAnon influencer who obtained and published internal FBI emails identifying more than a dozen FBI employees. Wonder where she got them.
Of those Jordan *did* interview, here's a retired FBI supervisory analyst's since-deleted older tweet (surprise, the internet is forever) suggesting the government send assassination teams to kill those officials that Durham didn't prosecute.

Read 4 tweets
Mar 3
I mean, why stop now?

“But the work so far, the Republican says, has been ‘very much amateur hour,’ adding that airing this ‘stuff on live television would make us look like morons.’” rollingstone.com/politics/polit…
Wonder how the FBI views the counterintelligence issues of a “whistleblower” Special Agent giving an interview to a registered agent of the Russian govt. Did he even tell the FBI?

“Friend said in an interview with Russia Today that Jordan’s office had “attached’ him to Foster.”
I mean, this sounds not great.

“Mr. Friend also engaged with Russian propaganda outlets while he was an F.B.I. employee…including being quoted extensively in an article in Sputnik…and appearing for an interview with Russia Today.”

Gift link: nytimes.com/2023/03/02/us/…
Read 4 tweets
Mar 1
An astonishing article. In 20 years of working cases involving classified information, I never - not once - encountered prosecutors who wanted to get a search warrant and reluctant - even refusing! - agents. The other way around, sure.

wapo.st/3ZavxSl
The article points to a damning fear in the FBI stemming from political fear, not from fact.

“The FBI agents’ caution also was rooted in the fact that mistakes in prior probes of Hillary Clinton…had proved damaging to the FBI”

Really? Name one. I’ll wait.
“Some of those field agents wanted to shutter the criminal investigation altogether in early June, after Trump’s legal team asserted a diligent search had been conducted and all classified records had been turned over”

How’d that work out?

Oh, right, Trump still had 100+ docs.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(