So the droplet people said viruses travel in droplets only. Two metres.

But ... How would that work? And nobody could cite support.

I got suspicious.

A thread.
I looked for something that proved droplet and found nothing.

That's right, not a single atudy proves droplet transmission.

But I could find a lot proving things airborne:

I looked for the origin of droplet and found it was some guy's guess ... in 1912.

I found that im the 1930s droplet theory had been ripped apart:

They say droplets fall on things and you touch them. I actually looked for support for fomites, and found little.

They said only TB, measles, and chickenpox was airborne

I found many more

I also found TB, measles, and chickenpox all used to be considered droplet before they were considered airborne
And then I rolled it all up. All by January 2021.

Even the WHO, trying to prove droplet, ended up accidentally proving things are airborne

What a farce.

#covidisairborne
In short:



If I could figure this out, enough people knew or could do so as well.

They didn't, likely because of panic myth and ego.

Sad.
Later, in October 2021, I put together all the airborne review articles that I could find.

These are overview articles, not studies, meaning they're chalk full of studies.

There were more than I expected.

Then here's a bonus thread about denial and panic myth.

If you liked this thread donate to my Subs--oh I don't have.

Ah, follow me on YouT--hmm don't have that either.

Okay then, give my boss a tag and get me a rais--oh, can't get one of those.

Well, I guess just wear an N95 and be safe then.
Oh thought of something you could go read our history of airborne etc. Disclosure: I am a coauthor. @jljcolorado spearheaded it. Follow him too.

I ended up banging out a very brief summary of airborne transmission from 1850 to 2024, here:

I just noticed "chock full" in one of my old posts was auto corrected to "chalk full".

This makes me think of clapping chalk eraser brushes in school; the clouds of chalk dust would float quite a while.

Well, those particles were much larger than particles containing viruses...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Mesiano-Crookston's translucent form

Jonathan Mesiano-Crookston's translucent form Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jmcrookston

Apr 25
Has anyone worked up the ladder of denial for bird flu?

- We have not found bird flu.

- We have found bird flu in one bird. There is no evidence of bird to bird transmission.
- We have found bird flu in many birds and there is bird to bird transmission but it has not moved to other mammals.

- We have found bird flu in a cow. However, we have not found evidence of cow to cow transmission.

- We have now found bird flu in many cows.
- We have now found evidence of cow to cow transmission but we do not know how this is happening.

- We found some bird flu in the milk. You should not worry because this might not be live virus. However, for some reason, we now think milk is the vector of transmission.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 20
I'm so fed up with people taking the WHO seriously.

This is from 2014. Image
Image
They already said "airborne" although they had said long-range (throw back to 1910, by the way)

But wait for it Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 17
Wow they buried the lead.

COVID might be up to an R0 of 24, eating measles for breakfast. Image
Very comparable at median of 11 to measles, which is probably 9 to 12.

Anyway from p. 19 iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
And measles from much much older reports...

Somewhere I posted an article that looked at how they arrived at 12 to 18 and concluded it was more like 9 to 12. Probably on the low end too.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 18
For anyone reading this, he means "Airborne" as in the three viruses that require Airborne precautions.

Those are _defined_ as TB, measles and chickenpox.

They are "airborne" because they are "Airborne."

It is totally ludicrous, yes.
It means negative pressure rooms and N95s, which is why they desperately do not want COVID to be called "Airborne".
This is why, during SARS, when a roomful of Canadian doctors and nurses got sick even though they were using "Droplet precautions" (I'll capitalize) - that is, medical masks - they invented AGMP, so they could explain how a droplet virus infected people using Droplet Precautions.
Read 14 tweets
Jan 25
⚠️Please people.

We are no longer calling it "fire".

It is "potentially harmful chemical combustion energy output".
This of course means the fire department will be renamed as well.

It will be called the "organization for the suppression of potentially harmful chemical combustion energy output situations."
And please do not ask them to get your cat out of your tree. They will not understand.

It is an "affective feline mammal trapped in a heightened potential energy state of arboreal origin."
Read 6 tweets
Dec 20, 2023
@mvankerkhove @CIDRAP @WHO Thanks.

Seems most health care locations (in Ontario) ignore the WHO. That's too bad.

This is December 2020 for anyone who wants it.

iris.who.int/bitstream/hand…
@mvankerkhove @CIDRAP @WHO Just so people understand the history and how many documents one would have to pore through

Jan 2020


March 2020


April 2020


June 2020


Dec 2020
iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
@mvankerkhove @CIDRAP @WHO Feb 2021 does not rec universal masking



But it comes back by April 2022:

Infection prevention and control in the context of coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a living guideline, 25 April 2022
iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
iris.who.int/handle/10665/3…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(