New: I spoke to one of the four victims of the Southampton attack. “John” was shocked by the attack, and was disappointed that no officers came after it. @HantsPolice say it’s a “hate-related assault” and are investigating
It started with this man in white shirt showing up at the Hong Kong rally in Southampton on Sunday, where he tried to provoke people, saying “Hong Kong is China” and swearing, taking photos of the banners and calling his friends to come. Not much happened there after.
After the rally, “John” and three others went to eat on Burgess Road, near @unisouthampton. A man in red shirt took photos of them, and asked what the pro-democracy slogans on one’s shirt meant. Then, the man apparently called others to come.
“John” was not in the video cos he was getting to his car in the other side, and rushing back when he heard noise. He tried to block attackers from assaulting a female friend, who got hand injury. Male friend got neck injury.
They tried to leave, and the attackers followed them to a Sainsbury’s Local nearby. There was a security so they didn’t go in, and the assaulted called the police. However, 999 said they should call 101 since no danger to life, and no response from 101. They reported online.
John and others didn’t go to the hospital, as they couldn’t believe this happened and would rather feel safe at home. Police haven’t reached them yet as of 1pm Monday.
Hong Kong paper Ming Pao adds disclaimer to opinion pieces: "Critical articles aim at pointing out mistakes or faults of systems & policies to fix or eradicate them via legal means, no intention of incitement of hatred, discontent or hostility against govt or other communities"
You can see it at end of any article. The disclaimer is also printed on the newspaper.
This is added certainly due to closure of 3 news outlets in 6 months, including Citizen News whose editors said they can no longer see where is the 'red line' news.mingpao.com/pns/%E8%A7%80%…
and also because of this: Hong Kong barrister Chow Hang-tung jailed for what she wrote on Ming Pao
RTHK’s “Hong Kong Connection” programme checked security footage on July 21 last year and found a suspected police officer - apparently holding a warrant card - was present when people in white shirts gathered with weapons, before the men attacked people at Yuen Long MTR station
In another shot, the suspected police officer clearly saw a man holding a stick - a weapon used later that night to beat people up.
Relevant segment starts at 19:45 of the programme.
When approached by RTHK at a district council meeting, Yuen Long police commander Eric Ho said he cannot comment on the identity of the suspected officer. He asked RTHK to send a written question. But the written reply did not confirm or deny if the man was a police officer.
Here it goes: National Security Law for Hong Kong full text. No English translation. gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/2…
Main points:
-max life imprisonment
-anyone convicted cannot run for public office (or be disqualified) w/o mentioning for how long
-cases involving national secrets will not have open trials
-uncertain if have retroacting effect
-no bail for suspects
...
-suspects may hire lawyers, but it may be possible after first interrogation
-chief executive selects judges, judges can be disqualified if they made remarks endangering national security
-cases can be heard behind closed doors to protect national secret
...