TLDR: theres a couple of main types of lolicons I have seen
> people that treat lolis like other anime women tropes (tsundere, kuudere, etc.)
> people that uses lolis as a praxis of control over consent
There's a waifu culture in general Japanese otaku culture and part of why lolis are seen as "normal" is more or less because women in Asia just generally look younger than Western women and thus focus a lot more on appearing cute to appeal to their culture
Unfort the above thread is locked so I'll use screens but tldr: Lolicon as a concept is so normalized over there that they use the terms "legal loli" and "irl loli" unironically, especially in pornographic contexts over in Japan and iirc general Asia
This is also the same reason why lolicon in Japanese doesn't outright translate to pedophile despite what Google translate says. It should be known that these online translators aren't perfect so relying on them for cultural context is cringe
As for why they are usually minors though, thats actually very basic: A lot of lolis tend to come from Shounen which is essentially the manga/anime genre aimed at young dudes. Shoujo tech falls into this as well but I rarely am into Shoujo myself so I can't speak on that
(apologies for the CBR sourcing but its for variety of sources)
So the girls being underage is way less likely to add to the fetish as non anime mfs tend to argue but essentially to appeal to the demographic. You would have to hold the same standard for the male protagonists who themselves are usually minors
As for the second category, I'm clearly not as versed in this and its weird but here goes:
TLDR: a lot of lolicons like said lolis because they relate to the lolis themselves and not neccessarily want to sexualize them
hiding names but when I first friended my current group of anime friends on Discord, I asked them this same question.
These are the responses I got
To summarize the positions of these group of people, they generally, especially after seeing therapists, get recommended to engage their trauma or mental issues via fiction as a way to abstract their issues in a safe environment
This is especially common for CSA surivivors and explains partly why the rape fantasies among the public can be so high
So yeah, theres the context. Take it or leave it, lolicon is still odd imo but I hope this shows how this isn't pedo coping for yall normies.
Stay safe and protect one another
Forgot to add but yes, this shit is effectively confirmed to be separated from actual pedophilia and pedophilia advocates: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
not only is there a lack of history correlating the two outright, but psychologically it just doesn't add up based on the studies
ofc theres pedos occasionally in lolicon spaces like every other space
and like any other space, they fucking hate them
again, not revealing the people behind these discord messages but these people actually helped with exposing that map I shat on a couple of days ago via discord
That said, I will rant a little bit, I think its genuinely retarded that lolicons don't know how to argue their own hobby properly, especially when they talk such a big game about gatekeeping
The best way to show how this isn't pedophilic is by showing actual genuine studies and science to show that. You owe it to yourself, the so called "loli community" and generally even the antis you dislike to prevent them from being antis
The worst of these is when people try to argue that lolicon prevents pedophiliac rape as a form of "safe cp"
not only is this demonstrably false, but it protrays lolicon as related to cp when its not since the genre is about the body type, not the age
Regardless of real world politics, CP (or properly csem) has nothing to do with drawn shit. otherwise programs made for taking down CP wouldn't tell you outright to stop sending it
i keep seeing my mutuals retweet this but i kinda have beef with specific points:
> protecting children as a point is regarding the sexualization of them from the rightoid perspective iirc, so points like "gun control" just really don't make sense to throw in outside of idealogy
> weighing children in schools isn't inherently related to sexualization and tbh is just a few steps from "crack down on teachers sexualizing students"
if you want to do that and include prevention of weighing children, go ahead but this alone does little
> "Get children pit of abusive situations immediately."
wdym? unlike the police, you can't really have people just observe parents from a far and while we'd all imagine cps to be amazing, I've heard and seen too many cases of that system perpetuating abuse (albeit on accident)
I feel like the whole "Gwen is trans" controversy if you will, shows how important original representation is. people literally act like its still the 2000s where this kind of thing wasn't promoted socially unlike now and imo its because we don't have good trans characters
listen to their logic:
"why not just us have this one thing?"
"why can't we headcanon this"
they still actually want trans characters that are preferably not dogshit or hamfisted. They just don't really have the intelligence to explain that
its like how Bud Light activists probs don't know about the ESG score, the Frankfurt School Intellectual Ecosystem, etc but feel like as if theres something wrong with the advertising they get.