Legal immigration is *impossible* for nearly all immigrants wishing to immigrate to the U.S. legally.
You can’t just “get in line.” That’s a fiction perpetuated by those who want to keep immigration illegal.
My latest report explains why. Here’s the summary in 1 pic... 🧵
U.S. immigration law's basic premise is that all immigrants are *guilty* until proven innocent.
Immigration is ILLEGAL unless you prove you fall into a narrow eligible category.
The result is that over 99% of people who want to immigrate legally cannot do so.
No one outside the U.S. is eligible for a green card unless they fall into one of five narrow exceptions...
⬇️
First Option: America’s Refugee Program—Accepts about 1 in 5,000 displaced people around the world, and the percentage accepted keeps dropping year after year.
Second Option: The Diversity Lottery—Accepts fewer than 1 in 500 applicants.
Because the lottery excludes the top-origin countries for legal immigrants, a majority of the world’s population is ineligible to apply.
3rd Option: Family Sponsorship—Only available to the closest relatives of U.S. citizens & green card holders—and still has a backlog of nearly 7 million thanks to an annual cap of just 226,000.
Most new sponsors in most categories will *die* before their relatives can immigrate.
Fourth Option: Self-Sponsorship—Available only to
-those with “extraordinary ability,”
-people with advanced degrees or “exceptional ability” who also have projects of “national importance,” and
-$800K-$1M investors who create 10 jobs in 2 years.
Not viable for many
Fifth/Final Option: Employer Sponsorship—Made impossible by red tape and low caps.
The normal employer-sponsored applicant will suffer through this insane filing maze, which can take between 2 and 3 years of processing time and cost tens of thousands of dollars.
Very few employers are willing to do this process except for the highest-skilled workers, and even then, only if they can get them an H-1B work visa first to allow workers to work while the process plays out.
But fewer than 1 in 5 can get a visa through the H-1B lottery anyway.
Even if employers win the H-1B lottery, no U.S. workers apply, and wait years, there is a backlog that is many times the annual cap.
Half the workers are from India, and thanks to the individual country caps, nearly all new Indian applicants will die without getting a green card
AS IMPORTANTLY, there’s no year-round, low-skilled guest worker visa *at all.*
Their employers have to go through a years-long process, hoping they get a worker and hoping that the worker stays with them when they get here.
Vanishingly few even try.
The U.S. historically had a much higher rate of legal immigration than it does now, and the U.S. ranks low compared to other wealthy countries for immigrants per capita.
We’d need over 75 million immigrants *tomorrow* to catch Australia.
The status quo has no justification.
This is a very broad overview.
My new #CatoImmigration paper is a detailed explanation of the rules of U.S. legal immigration in as jargon-free language as possible. It is a resource for policymakers & the public seeking to understand the system better. cato.org/policy-analysi…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨Unprecedented Student Visa Denials in 2022: 35% Rejected. In 2022, consular officers denied a record 220,676 student visas. More than 1 in 3 student visa applicants were denied. This is a disaster as student visas are the jumping-off point for most skilled immigrants.
The United States is losing hundreds of thousands of talented students and future workers because the State Department claims too many of the students will want to stay permanently in the United States. cato.org/blog/unprecede…
One reason for the increase in the worldwide denial rate is that Chinese students (who the State Dept denies at lower rates) have stopped applying for other reasons, while Indian students who are denied at higher rates are applying more than ever.
Fentanyl Is Smuggled for U.S. Citizens By U.S. Citizens, Not Asylum Seekers. Facts:
-Fentanyl trafficking is funded by US consumers: ~99% are U.S. citizens.
-US citizens were 86.3% of fentanyl traffickers in 2021, 10 times more than illegal immigrants cato.org/blog/fentanyl-…
>90% of fentanyl seizures happen at ports of entry. That U.S. citizens account for most fentanyl trafficking convictions is not surprising since U.S. citizens can easily cross through ports and are subject to less scrutiny than others.
It's not surprising that drugs are smuggled through ports by U.S. citizens because, according to the government, it is far easier to smuggle drugs through ports of entry than it is for a person to get across the border illegally without being arrested.
Aside from his selectively quoting the Founders & ignoring their actual policies, is Nate suggesting that Jefferson was actually right here? That 18th and 19th century immigrants to the U.S. did not assimilate and corrupted American liberty? B/c he wasn't
The Founders' actual policies were as close to open borders as you can get, and Nate can't get around that by appealing to occasional misgivings. He can't ignore they wrote the Constitution to give immigrants the chance not just to vote but to become senators & congressman
When it came time to vote, the Founders voted for open borders, and they did so enthusiastically. Their occasional pessimistic statements are outweighed by their actions, and those statements were proven incorrect, as Lincoln was quick to note cato.org/blog/founding-…
US Foreign‐Born Share Ranks Low & Is Falling Among Wealthy Countries. Despite the "extra credit" that comes from having a large illegal population, the U.S. foreign-born share is at the 26th percentile among wealthy countries, down from the 43rd in 2000 cato.org/blog/us-foreig…
For recent growth, the U.S. is 6th from the bottom among the wealthiest countries. The median increase per capita was nearly three times greater than it was in the U.S. from 2015-2020.
The United States went from dominating other wealthy countries in attracting immigrants to letting other countries receive all the immigrants. Why would we think this is good for our country?
I've heard consulates reject workers for reasons not in regs, such as paying agents to find employers, having no experience, supposedly filing for an immigration (rather than employment) purpose, making a 12-month commitment, doubting "intent" to work
Of course, they also deny for reasons that are in regs. It's easy to see where consular officers could get confused when they are trying to enforce other agencies' rules, and there's no correction mechanism because you can't appeal an IV denial.
It's easy to see how you could jump, for instance, from "you can't pay for the costs of a labor certification" to "you can't pay someone to find you an employer willing to file a labor certification."
The U.S. Department of State is denying an astounding 61% of employer-sponsored immigrant visa applicants because it claims to have found a problem with their job offers, even though those offers have already been reviewed and approved both by DOL and DHS. cato.org/blog/consulate…
This is not a new issue. The State Department dramatically ramped up denials for employer-sponsored immigrants in the 1990s. It has never publicly explained why, and no one has reported on the phenomenon before.
The staggering denial rate contrasts sharply with the extremely low rate of denials for employer-sponsored immigrants receiving green cards in the United States. Over the last decade+, workers abroad were 8 times more likely to be denied than workers in the U.S.