And we're off, with @timd_IFG welcoming everyone, introducing our excellent panel, and setting out how important but difficult the role of special adviser is. Today we're going to focus on how to be a good spad.
Baroness Sally Morgan starts by emphasising the importance of spads' relationships - with ministers and with civil servants, and ability to work as a team and make decisions. Also important to understand direction of travel of govt as a whole.
SM also highlights importance of being able to tell the PM/minister that something won't be possible. TD asks how you go about having that conversation. SM says it comes down to trust, and having a reputation as someone who delivers.
Sonia Khan echoes importance of trust in her experience too, and also highlights that some spads have become more well-known in their own right in recent years.
Jennifer Lees-Marshment now on skills spads need. Political judgement of course important, but also people skills - the ability to have good working r'ships with wide range of people - and advisory aptitude.
Turning to @eliz_lloyd's experience: if you are a Yes Minister person, you'll be a terrible special adviser. You need to be able to challenge and provoke your minister.
SM reflects on how well it can work when dept and No.10 spads have a good relationships with each other and with respective ministers, and when those spads have credibility.
JLM talks about management, and how important it is to be clear with spads about what you want them to do/what you want their role to be - sounds simple, but lots of times this doesn't happen.
So what skills/experience do spads need? Everyone agrees on need for political initiative, but also willingness/ability to get across complex, specialist information.
SK also highlights understanding of how the civil servants/government works. The best spads know how to work effectively with private office staff and other officials.
JLM: you don't have to know everything, but you have to be able to react and absorb quickly
TD asks how close to reality Malcolm Tucker is/was - SM says that a spad like that wouldn't deliver. LL agrees - spads deliver by soft skills, engagement, not going round and shouting at everyone.
JLM reminds that these are extremely high-pressure, stressful jobs - so anything the civil service can do, spads need to let them do those things, so they have time to do the things that only political advisers can.
SK doesn't feel the traditional policy/comms divide between spads doesn't work terribly well, as there are lots more things beyond that which spads can and do contribute to. She thinks the HMT model where there are a wider range of specialisms among spads works better.
Now we're on to audience questions. First round of qs: what happens to spads when their minister careers end; and is central management of spads the direction of travel for future governments?
SM: recommends former spads take a bit of time to think about what they really want to do afterwards. And she agrees with SK that other spads are often the only people who really understand what it's like.
On centralisation: SK thinks that things are increasingly centralised, including implementation, and that means that less gets done. No.10 is very, very small - even very capable central spads can't do everything.
Q. about cabernet set-ups, similar to how some other countries do it: SM and LL reflect on pros and cons of policy/delivery units, which can be a gesture towards this, and can provide challenge in a collaborative environment.
Q. about accountability/level of responsibility spads have for the advice they give: LL notes that advisers can't decide anything or spend any money, and SK says that ministers get advice from multiple sources, not just advisers.
Q. about diversity of spads: JLM has found that in Australia and New Zealand, concerted effort has been made to recruit a more diverse pool of people into these roles.
SM responds to an audience comment about codifying spads' roles and responsibility. Her view is that it's the minister and/or PM to hold spads to account. And SK highlights that there is a spad code, but the challenge is where it conflicts with your minister/No.10.
Final audience question about positive/negative working environment for spads: JLM says there are pockets of good practice that need to be spread around. SK emphasises the fantastic opportunities you get as a spad.
JLM - learn from your peers.
SK - find a good advocate/mentor.
SM - go in with the right motives.
LL - know why you're doing it, and that it's not about you.
And that's a wrap! If you'd like to watch the event back, it'll be available on our website very soon - and join us for our event on WhatsApp in government on Thursday!
Tim Durrant opens the event. He asks Matt Warman how he used WhatsApp in government, and what the benefits of it were. Warman says that WhatApp is primarily a useful tool in government. #IfGWhatsApp
Warman says that government uses WhatsApp, but not often for communication with civil servants. Government communication is very structured and formal. There is no shadow government running on WhatsApp. WhatsApp is a new channel, not a fundamental change.
1) how does light-touch reg deal with failure? 2) how can you use your available levers to drive change? 3) How can you use your eco-system? 3) how much regulation is enough? 4) how have I managed to turn around FRC?
Hannah White welcomes the audience to the event, thanks Grant Thornton for their support, and asks the opening question: what are the big challenges in your area in 2023?
For the Civil Service, Alex Thomas says the challenge will be to cope with tight budgets to make efficiencies while improving the service it provides to ministers and the public. Pay will also be an issue, referring to the fast stream strike announced today.
PM begins by thanking HW and the IfG for the invitation. She argues we need to think about strategy, not just tactics. We all have a good sense of the challenges facing us - we are all, also, part of the solution.
PM: Part of the frustration of politics is not that people don't have solutions, but that people have great solutions. They want to take responsibility, to help. During Covid, for instance, everyone stepped up.
IfG Programme Director @AlexGAThomas: 2023 will not be a particularly easy year for the civil service, with strikes, inflation, and challenges from without and within.