An interesting study that takes a look into the early host response during SARS2 infection. Some takeaways from the study. (1/n) science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
The study made use of hamsters that were infected through the nose with SARS2 in order to assess immune response via the respiratory route. (2/n)
An immune response was noted due to upregulation of genes related to interferon production in different organs of the body. Noted too was the presence of viruses capable of replication in some organs like the heart and nose, although most were concentrated in the lungs.(3/n)
Expression of genes related to interferon signaling outside the lungs were most noted in the kidneys. (4/n)
Interferon is a protein that is necessary in the initial stages of the immune response since these help in preventing the virus from replicating in the body. (5/n)
The study notes the immediate expression of Ifnl, -- interferon usually associated to the immune response in lung tissue underscoring the immediate onset of the immune response in the lungs. Expression in the blood is seen only after immunity is activated in the lungs. (6/n)
To further test the importance of the immune response in the lungs, the hamsters were given dexamethasone, a corticosteroid that dampens the immune response.
The study notes that in a normal immune response, viral clearance is achieved in 5 days from infection in hamsters (7/n)
Noted too is a marked decrease in T-cells after SARS2 infection, as compared to B-Cells. This was regardless of whether or not there was a dampening of the immune response from dexamethasone. (8/n)
The study showed how a dampened immune response led to prolonged viral replication in the lungs and delayed clearance. (increase noted through day 5 post infection) (9/n)
Noted too were the lessened presence of antigen presenting cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells, during a dampened immune response. (10/n)
It was also shown how the delay/dampened immune response in the lungs led to infection in other organs.(11/n)
To further test this result, the authors infected the hamsters intravenously in order to bypass the respiratory route. Viral replication was more noticeable in hamsters who were directly infected through the blood, compared to these who were infected through the nose.(12/n)
Also seen was the need for organs to be primed through innate immunity, stressing the importance of a well-functioning immune system needed to protect against SARS2. (13/n)
Personal takeaways:
The study shows how viral persistence may indeed be happening in people with long COVID since the study shows prolonged replication and delayed clearance can happen.
This also shows the importance of the quick immune response in the lungs in order to (14/n)
prevent the onset of long COVID. BUT, given other variants which do not exhibit fusogenicity to the lower RT, other avenues wrt long COVID mechanisms should be explored.
Do take note that there are still those who develop long COVID in the absence of lower RT symptoms and (15/n)
clinical manifestations.
The study again notes how T-cells are affected by SARS2.
What also comes to mind is how the immune response will be affected, especially with newer variants that attempt to downregulate interferon expression.
Finally, the study doesn't address (16/n)
CW: graphics which may gross you out
There have been anecdata coming out about oral pathologies which start to develop after a Covid infection, regardless of severity at the acute phase. This prospective study reports the different oral lesions in patients who've had Covid (1/n)
and who have developed conditions two weeks after infection.
Reported lesions include geographic tongue , otherwise known as migratory glossitis. This condition involves the smoothening of certain parts of the top portion of the tongue. (2/n)
Condition may be painful and is supposed to resolve on its own. (photo from aaom.com/geographic-ton…) (3/n)
The epithelium is a lining of tissue that covers many of the body's organs. The cells that make up the epithelium are usually taken into consideration since changes in how epithelial cells look like can give us a clue as to whether or not these changes can lead to (1/n)
worse conditions such as cancer. There are many kinds of changes that can be observed in epithelial cells, but one that pathologists usually look out for is dysplastic change -- changes that are often considered precancerous.
When cells become dysplastic, they change in (2/n)
size and shape which makes them structurally different from the surrounding normal cells. More about dysplasia here in this short video👇(3/n)
Let's put it this way. The nucleus is that part of the cell where you have DNA and where all the good stuff is initially manufactured. The last thing you want is for any of the dirty stuff to enter the part where manufacturing happens because you wouldn't want anything (1/n)
to happen to the final product.
In the same manner, you really wouldn't want any of these viral parts to enter any of the nuclei in any of your cells where YOUR DNA is stashed. You wouldn't want any parts of the virus messing around with your DNA.
Additional info from the study shows that sars2 has proteins on the spike's surface that allow it to enter the nucleus.
Initially, being an RNA virus, it would have been expected for this virus to stay in the cytoplasm. Apparently, this isn't the case.
How this translates ...
An interesting study which compares respiratory pathogens -- divoc, MERS and the common flu-- in a simulation of the nasal environment. 🧵 (1/n) pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
Study made use of cells that are the same as those that line the nose. Results showed replication happens a lot in these nasal cells. Take note that dovic replication is sustained at 33 degrees. Viral load titers of dovic > MERS and the ordinary cold. (2/n)
Further testing shows that MERS, and especially dovic, efficiently replicate at 33 degrees C, which is the normal temperature in the nasal environment. Replication drops at 37 degrees, which is the temperature in the lungs. (3/n)
Trying different ways of tweeting here. H/T @NateB_Panic. Same question as his. (1/n)
Why are media and health professionals in denial wrt different sequelae when there's so much research going around--enough to come up with a huge list of references even! (2/n)
Important takeaways from the study mentioned are as follows:
🚩77% of participants with the prolonged effects of divoc infection had some sort of abnormality in cerebrospinal fluid--that liquid stuff that's found in both brain and spinal cord. medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/cere….
A pretty impressive and detailed study that shows the immune response to Covid with some minor comments at the end of a long🧵 1/n medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
The study involved 16 participants, all without previous history of Covid and without any record of combormidity.
The participants were infected with the original strain through the 👃 and checked for immune responses daily. 2/n
Nasopharyngeal swabs and blood samples were taken to monitor changes in immunity as the disease progressed.
Participants were grouped into three groups:
1. Those who were symptomatic (n=6) were placed under “sustained infection’. 3/n