(1/18) Today, instead of a specific technical feature, I'd like to talk about the modernised T-64BVs that the Ukrainians currently use.
(2/18) These tanks are popularly known as 'T-64BV zrazka 2017 roku' ('T-64BV mod. 2017'), but I have not seen any evidence this is an official military designation.
(3/18) In general, the Soviet, Russian, and Ukrainian militaries did not use 'model year' designations. This is something that enthusiasts/historians came up with to distinguish modifications implemented in different production years. e.g. both of these are just T-72B in manuals.
(4/18) Prior to the Donbas War, the primary Ukrainian T-64 modernisation effort was the BM Bulat (Object 447AM1).
In many ways, the BM Bulat is to the T-64BV what the T-80U is to the T-80BV. Indeed, it was at one point known as the 'T-64U' (below).
(5/18) It primarily concentrates on improving the 'hard stats' of the T-64, like the traditional firepower/mobility/armour triad (new FCS, new engine, new armour), and was the most modern tank available to the ZSU in reasonable numbers in 2014.
(6/18) Unfortunately, the Bulat did not prove an unqualified success, and Sergey Buryak of the Ivan Chernyakhovsky National University of Defense of Ukraine noted some of its drawbacks.
(7/18) Combat experience from the Donbas War led to a reevaluation of priorities for Ukrainian tanks and armour in general. They are outlined in Prof. Vadym Slyusar's presentation at the 2020 Intl. Armoured Vehicles Conference:
(8/18) This is reflected in the modernised T-64BV. The first significant upgrade to situational awareness was the addition of a thermal sight in the form of Trimen's TPN1 TPV.
(9/18) The TPN1 TPV is based on the hopelessly obsolete TPN1 night vision sight (shown), but with the electro-optical converter inside taken out and replaced with a thermal imaging matrix. It can therefore fit into existing sight housings for the TPN1.
(10/18) It operates in conjunction with the regular 1G42 day sight, and is rated effective out to 4 km.
(11/18) Thermal optics have many advantages over passive night vision, especially in conditions where smoke or dust may obscure the latter. They also do not require illumination, which the old TPN1 needs to see beyond about 400 m.
(12/18) In addition to the thermal sight, the ancient R-123M/R-173 radios were first replaced by a Libid K-2RB radio. The Libid is a licence-built Motorola MOTOTRBO DM4600 series two-way radio.
(13/18) Regardless, the Lybid was a reasonably modern encrypted VHF/UHF radio set with some anti-jamming features such as frequency hopping. However, later L3Harris radios such as the Falcon III, regarded as more secure, began replacing the Lybid.
(15/18) This allows for more accurate navigation using GPS or GLONASS. It is also able to function as part of a battlefield management system alongside the Libid/L3Harris radios, as Buryak notes, but details are lacking.
(16/18) An attempt was also made to upgrade the protection, using Nizh shaped charge array ERA configured to fit inside existing Kontakt-1 boxes.
I will not talk about Nizh here, as it would require an entire thread of its own.
(17/18) Other than these upgrades, most of the other changes are quality-of-life changes for the crew, such as stepladders for easier crew access. The engine and transmission remain unchanged, same for the gun. @AndreiBtvt has a good walkaround:
(18/18) In summary, the modernised T-64BV is really more of an economical upgrade for the large T-64 fleet to implement the priorities the Ukrainians felt needed addressing after the Donbas War.
Time will tell if they made the right choices.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(1/17) I wrote earlier about the tracks of the T-64 and how they contribute to the T-64's good cross-country performance in mud and snow, but they are only one part of the equation.
The other part is the road wheels.
(2/17) The T-64 uses small-diameter narrow road wheels made mostly out of steel (a basic fact that some books like this 2022 one cannot even be bothered to fact-check). These have internal rubber shock absorbers (24).
(3/17) This puts it in stark contrast with every other post-war Soviet medium or main battle tank since the T-34, which use large-diameter stamped aluminum alloy road wheels with external rubber tires.
(1/14) Many of you are probably familiar with the fact that the Soviets used autoloaders on their late-Cold War tanks.
Today I only really want to talk about something special about the T-64's (and T-80B's) autoloader that is mostly ignored. But first, some background...
(2/14) Some of you may also know that the T-64/80 and T-72 families use different basic autoloader designs.
The T-64's (left) is known in Russian as the механизм заряжания ('loading mechanism', MZ), while the T-72's (right) is the автомат заряжания ('automatic loader', AZ).
(3/14) I won't get into the reasons/justifications why these tanks ended up using different autoloaders, (long story short: rivalry between the Kharkov and Ural design teams/factories), but let's take a closer look at some of the MZ control panels.
(1/16) When I did my first thread on the T-64, I mentioned that it is an oft-misunderstood tank. So, let's look at one of these oft-misunderstood aspects: its turret armour.
(2/16) Various books in English have gotten it wrong. Often seems to be the result of confusion, because different configurations were tried on the T-64s before 1974.
The first one was published in 2014, so maybe just outdated info, but the latter was published in 2022!
(3/16) The development of the T-64's turret was a complicated affair. The best history in English on it is @AndreiBtvt's article on Warspot, which was translated into English by @Tank_Archives.
(1/16) For a change, today we will look a non-automotive special feature of the T-64A/B: its commander cupola and AAMG mounting.
(2/16) Unlike its rivals, the T-72 and T-80, the T-64A and later the T-64B received the remote controlled ZU-64A AAMG mounting with the 12.7 mm Utyos (NSVT) in 1974.
This allows the commander to fire it without exposing himself, as seen in this Georgian Legion video.
(3/16) The cupola and ZU-64A are controlled using two control panels: PG-20 (blue) and PV-20 (red)
Having looked at the T-64's engine cooling system, now we move just a little over to its engine air intake and cleaning system...
Now, of course, like any internal combustion engine, the 5TDF needs air. And it doesn't like dusty air either, so it needs an air cleaning system too.
The first thing you'll notice are the flaps next to the intake. These are to deflect dust kicked up by the tracks next to the intake. They're unique to tanks with the 5TDF and 6TD engines due to the intake location, like the T-64, T-80UD, and T-84 (right).