I am a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, worked on two Supreme Court confirmations, and clerked for two federal appellate judges.
The indictment and case against President Trump is outrageous and shocking.
But let’s get into the details.
Here are my 6 key points on the case:
(1) Interplay between the Espionage Act and the Presidential Records Act
A lot of my friends have spoken insightfully about the scope of the Presidential Records Act. I’d direct you to Mike Davis’s (@mrddmia) commentary on the subject, and also Michael Bekesha of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(2) Classification and National Defense Information
I want to reiterate this point because it’s really important:
Just because something is classified—even Top Secret, SCI, NOFORN, FISA, pick your alphabet soup—does not mean that it is National Defense Information (NDI) within… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(3) Walt Nauta and DOJ Misconduct
Far and away the most troubling side story to emerge from this saga so far are the allegations made by Trump aide and co-defendant Walt Nauta’s lawyer last week.
You may have missed it if you blinked. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media has… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(4) Attorney Client Privilege
The indictment relies on a significant amount of information received, in one form or another, from one of Trump’s lawyers, Evan Corcoran, who was compelled to testify in front of the grand jury. According to news reports, the argument for breaching… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(5) Timing: Why now?
This is not a legal defect in the indictment, but it’s an important point. Why are they bringing this case now?
They know that Trump is the leading candidate for president. They know he’s beating Biden in the polls. They must know how bad it looks for a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(6) Jack Smith: Why him?
If you could pick any lawyer in the country to handle a controversial case against a former president, a case involving an aggressive, unprecedented use of the Espionage Act, a controversial law in and of itself, what lawyer would you pick?
This has been fun. Happy to answer questions, and I’m sure I’ll post more as the case proceeds.
It’s been pointed out to me that the final vote on McDonnell v. United States was 8-0, not 9-0, because Justice Scalia passed away before the opinion was issued.
My point still stands. The Supreme Court unanimously said that Smith overstepped and smacked him down for it.
And if you like what you’ve read, and want to help elect a conservative fighter as Missouri’s next Attorney General, check out our campaign at: votescharf.com
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
He's going to lose, and it's not going to be close.
Missourians are going to stand behind Josh Hawley.
But let's dig a little deeper on Wesley.
The receipts are telling.
1/8
Bell was first elected as St. Louis County prosecutor in 2018, unseating Bob McCulloch, whose offense in the eyes of the woke left seems to have been prosecuting violent criminals and supporting the police.
Bell was supported by some of the most radical leftists in America.
2/8
Bell took $57,500 from Real Justice PAC.
That PAC was funded largely by Cari Tuna, the radical leftist wife of Facebook founder Dustin Moskovitz. Tuna and Moskovitz have contributed tens of millions to radical left wing causes.
There is nothing antisemitic about opposing George Soros.
Today, @josh_hammer and I are launching Jews Against Soros (JewsAgainstSoros.com), a new grassroots coalition of Jews who oppose George Soros's radical left-wing agenda.
Soros directly spent $128.5 million on left-wing campaigns in the 2022 midterm elections, making him the largest political donor in America.
The Democracy Alliance network that he co-founded publicly announced plans to spend $275 million to defeat President Trump in 2020.
2/8
Soros spent $40 million funding radical left-wing prosecutors like Kim Gardner, Alvin Bragg, Chesa Boudin, and Kim Foxx, who have refused to prosecute violent criminals, turning great American cities into crime warzones.
3/8
BREAKING: The Supreme Court just announced that its investigation into the person who leaked the draft Dobbs opinion has "been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence."
The investigation is set to continue. But let's recap some facts:
1/6
Shortly before one of the most consequential SCOTUS opinions in history was released, an individual took it upon themselves to leak a draft of that opinion.
As a direct result of that leak, conservative justices were subjected to unprecedented death threats and harassment.
2/6
An individual showed up to Justice Kavanaugh's home with a gun, ammunition, zip ties, and other weapons.
He said he was there to kill Justice Kavanaugh.
Fortunately, he was apprehended by law enforcement before he could do anything.