@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 1/12》Crop yields rose in part because of CO2 fertilization.

Plus, the catastrophic, drought-triggered famines which plagued mankind for all of human history are disappearing from living memory, in part because elevated CO2 helps mitigate drought impacts.
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 2/12》Rising CO2 levels improve both crop yields and drought resistance. That's helping make famines rare for the 1st time in history.

If you're so young you don't understand how important that is, count yourself blessed! Famine used to be a scourge comparable to war & disease. Image
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 3/12》Ending famine is a VERY Big Deal, comparable to ending war and disease. Compare:

● 1918 flu pandemic killed 2% of world population.

● WWII killed 2.7% of world population.

● The global drought & famine of 1876-78 killed 3.7% of world population.
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 4/12》When I was a child, horrific famines were often in the news, in places like Bangladesh. But Bangladesh and India now have food surpluses, every year. Rising CO2 level is one of the reasons for that.

Food gluts are a MUCH better problem than famines!
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 5/12》Here's what manmade climate changes is REALLY doing. This is what climate activists are campaigning against:

“’Before, there was not a single scorpion, not a single blade of grass… Now you have people grazing their camel…"
tinyurl.com/NatGeo2009 Image
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 7/12》And this:
nasa.gov/feature/goddar…

Here's NASA's video about it:
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 9/12》The benefits of more CO2 are large & well-measured. The supposed harms are merely hypothetical, and mostly implausible.

CO2 levels were far above the current level for >98% of Earth's history, without causing "runaway" warming or acidic oceans.
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 10/12》None of the supposed major harms predicted to result from manmade climate change are actually happening.
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
@BradyGWilson @PaulHBeckwith 11/12》The scientific evidence compelling that manmade climate change is modest and benign, CO2 emissions are highly beneficial, and the social cost of carbon is negative.

sealevel.info/MSL_graph.php?…
sealevel.info/Dutch_dike_vs_…

Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton

✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ncdave4life

Jun 17
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 1/6 Eli, please tell me that YOU do not think CO2 which was FORMERLY in the air STILL has a warming effect!

I was SURE you are smarter than THAT!

Any two steadily increasing quantities correlate nicely. That doesn't mean one causes the other, of course.
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 2/6 Our CO2 emission rate is currently about twice the rate natural sinks (terrestrial greening, ocean uptake, etc.) remove CO2. But it's mere coincidence the ratio has been near 2:1 for a quite a while. If we halved CO2 emissions the ratio would be 1:1.
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 3/6 Coincidentally, for several decades the trend in CO2 concentration has been about half of the trend in "cumulative emissions."
But if we were to halve emissions that correlation would disappear entirely. Cumulative emissions would continue to rise, but CO2 level would not.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 17
1/36 It's amazing how effective the Climate Industry has been at frightening people, beyond the capacity for rational thought. Rutger Bregman @rcbregman, though a smart fellow, is nevertheless "terrified" by a miniscule (≤1°C), completely harmless, sea surface temperature blip.
@rcbregman 2/ 1°C is the outdoor air temperature change ("climate change") you get from an elevation change of only about 500 feet. 🥱

(That's based on an average temperature vs. altitude "lapse rate" of 6.5°C/km; 1000 / 6.5 = 154 meters.)
@rcbregman 3/ At mid-latitudes, 1°C is about the temperature change you get from a latitude change of only 60 miles (100 km).

(How different are the flora and fauna 60 miles from where you live?)
sealevel.info/2015_zones_hig… Image
Read 35 tweets
Jun 17
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 1/6」You've been ridiculing Donna Laframboise's work for years, without EVER bothering to even find out what she says, and you just did it again. How would you like it if someone did that to YOU?



@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 2/6」You just did it again, last night, despite the fact that you STILL have no clue what she says.
@EthonRaptor @ClimateOfGavin @NASAGoddard 3/6」You need to open your mind: watch Donna Laframboise's talk before passing judgement on her.

At 2x speed it'll take you only 15½ minutes.



You'll be impressed.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 17
Read 5 tweets
Jun 16
Read 6 tweets
Jun 15
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(