Thread by @theochick

Some thoughts after the #PCA50 #pcaga & kind of extension of this reflection I wrote last year. /1 theothoughts.com/2022/06/26/ten…

As mentioned in this piece, PCA ecclesial structure is what initially drew me to the denomination. Having come out of the non-denom world, I found the structure refreshing & mitigated the need for outside interference /2

In the right hands with humble & pastoral hearts, the structure with her procedures should work well foster the peace & purity of the church & care for all her members, protecting them from ills from outside & within. /3

But I’m seeing how that same governance can create an insular mindset where protection of the institution & her processes can take priority over the genuine care for ppl, esp. the vulnerable who are subject to abuse of various kinds. /4

I’m not saying that’s the case everywhere. But the temptation for a “good ol boys” network & its self-protection is ever present. It’s something to be especially mindful of, I think. /5

Don’t get me wrong, I still love PCA governance. I’m still glad to be a member of the PCA. I have mainly had good & positive experiences. I love my current & past church, as well as the number of PCA churches I have visited. /6

But then I’ve never been subject to abuse & have had to go through church courts for justice. I can’t imagine what it must have been like for those who have been harmed to see men voting in ways that can stimy accountability & limit investigations…/7

Over technicalities related to the BCO. It makes me think of Jesus’ words to the Pharisees about tending to particulars but neglecting the weightier matters (no I’m not calling these men Pharisees so don’t go there). /8

Bottom line, I have concerns but I do have hope. Because after all, the church valuing the authority of Scripture as the PCA does & desiring subjection to it, should be able to be guided by it over & above institutional priorities. /9

@threadreaderapp unroll