Read on Twitter
Regarding intel on the sick WIV workers, there are many questions.
Why is this still classified 3+ years after the pandemic started?
Were these details shared across all IC agencies that assessed #OriginOfCovid in 2021? What about in 2023? If so, which experts were consulted?
Why is this still classified 3+ years after the pandemic started?
Were these details shared across all IC agencies that assessed #OriginOfCovid in 2021? What about in 2023? If so, which experts were consulted?
Much of the info and data on #OriginOfCovid - early cases, market animals, lab viruses - is incomplete and sometimes clearly biased or suppressed in some way.
Even if the intel is incomplete, it would help if as much detail as possible is declassified.
Even if the intel is incomplete, it would help if as much detail as possible is declassified.
The Covid-19 Origin Act of 2023 that was signed by President Biden specifically asked for the declassification of the names and symptoms (date of onset) of the sick WIV workers and how they were involved in or exposed to coronavirus research.
congress.gov/118/plaws/publ…
congress.gov/118/plaws/publ…
To put this in context, Chinese investigators are being rebuked by scientists & WHO for sitting on negative, biased market data for 3 years - that data did not point to an infected animal at the market, and the Chinese scientists are still being scolded for not sharing it sooner.
If there are people who are in possession of info or even documents relating to possible early cases of Covid-19 - no matter how incomplete - should this not be shared with the public immediately at this point?
If everyone sat on their individual pieces of #OriginOfCovid info based on the reasoning that their piece is incomplete, biased, or negative, then there would be zero available data or info to date.
This is the reality of investigating how the pandemic started.
This is the reality of investigating how the pandemic started.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
