1/In this thread, I will address this rather absurd thread of allegations by @jvtklooster, a professor of political economy at the University of Amsterdam.
2/A week ago, @jvtklooster called my post about price controls a "silly polemic", lifting a quote from the post. I was rightfully annoyed at this characterization. A week later, @jvtklooster writes that only now has he "dug into" the work of mine that he insulted a week ago!
3/My recent post targeted a New Yorker article by @zachdcarter that, unfortunately, contained many errors. Here, @jvtklooster calls the article "nice", "factual", and "precise", but offers no more specific defense of the article.
4/If you want to read what I wrote, and to see all the various errors that the New Yorker article made, please do so! If @jvtklooster disagrees with any of these, I invite him to debate the specifics.
6/Just one problem: The tweet that @jvtklooster screenshots was specifically talking about MMT, rather than @IsabellaMWeber or her ideas! I made that explicitly clear in another tweet in the thread, which @jvtklooster neglects to mention or link to:
7/It is possible that @jvtklooster simply didn't scroll and read the other tweets in that thread, or it's possible that he lied and mischaracterized my tweet as an attack on Weber when I had explicitly stated it was in reference to MMT.
Either way, not good on his part.
8/@jvtklooster then says that I was one of the "angry online men" attacking @IsabellaMWeber last year, citing a post of mine about price controls that I wrote at the time.
10/But note that at the time, people considered my post measured and reasonable, rather than angry. For example, here is @adam_tooze recommending the post:
12/But @jvtklooster misunderstands Bruenig's argument entirely. His counterargument is that firms did in fact jack up prices. But @MattBruenig explicitly does not dispute this. Instead, he argues that there was a reason they DIDN'T jack up prices in 2019.
@jvtklooster 14/@jvtklooster then points out that I endorsed a couple of @IsabellaMWeber's ideas -- the G-7 oil price cap and buffer stocks -- and said they had been helpful.
That is true! I did! I always try to be fair-minded, generous, and accurate.
15/But it's strange that instead of giving me credit for giving @IsabellaMWeber credit, @jvtklooster chooses to characterize my endorsement of those ideas as a forced concession made in the middle of a "silly polemic".
Friend, I could have just not written those paragraphs!
16/@jvtklooster then argues that I caricatured Weber's idea for comprehensive, wartime price controls. He ignores that this was Carter's characterization in the article I was critiquing!!
17/But @jvtklooster also ignores the fact that in my post, I quoted Weber's own paper extensively, and discussed which of her recommendations from that paper have been implemented.
18/Next, @jvtklooster discusses the German gas commission. It did not implement price controls, but rather a subsidy; my post goes into detail about this. The German government paid producers for gas rather than regulating the price they could charge.
19/I'm not at liberty to discuss my own source on the German commission. But the HEAD of the commission called Carter's article "bad journalism" on Twitter -- a fact @jvtklooster fails to mention.
One big problem with this story is that the papers that people claim support the "greedflation" narrative do nothing of the kind, as @MattBruenig explains here:
As far as I can tell, "greedflation" proponents seized on several different papers, all of which tell very *different* stories about inflation, and two of which disavow the idea of "greedflation", as supporting their narrative, and just...ran with that.
In my roundup last week, I showed some evidence against the "greedflation" hypothesis. At the industry level, increases in markups (i.e., the driver of profits) have been uncorrelated with increases in prices in recent years.
Putin thinks Ukraine is an illegitimate country that doesn't deserve to exist -- a rogue province of Russia that needs to be forcibly (re)unified with his empire.
If you don't understand this, you don't understand the Ukraine War.
Putin thinks of Ukraine exactly as China thinks of Taiwan. The main difference is that Ukraine managed to win formal independence due to a period of extreme Russian weakness, while Taiwan did not.
Ukraine is already formally independent and recognized internationally as such. But in a very real sense, this is the Ukrainian War of Independence.