If you've made it this far, you'll be utterly unsurprised to learn that the walled garden that @PaulFox50854324's architect friend designed for him is in fact a stock photo.
Does @PaulFox50854324 own a treadmill? Maybe, but not this one - it's yet another plagiarized photo.
In a totally unsurprising development, @PaulFox50854324's neighbor's dog Hans is yet another stock photo.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Meet @thisisorange, a Twitter account created in February 2022 with a gold "verified organization" badge, thousands of batch-created fake followers, and a couple other interesting traits.
Verified organizations on Twitter can verify affiliated accounts (employees, teams, brand names, etc), which receive blue checkmarks as well as an organization badge (help.twitter.com/en/using-twitt…). The @thisisorange account has thousands of affiliates, mostly cryptocurrency accounts.
How did this come about? The website linked on @thisisorange's profile (orange dot associates) apparently allows one to become an affiliate simply by providing a Twitter account and a cryptocurrency wallet.
If your interests include OnlyFans, pro-China propaganda, and social media accounts with artificially generated faces, then this is the botnet for you. (There's also cryptocurrency spam involved because of course there is.) #FridayShenaniGANs
This network consists of (at least) 1627 Twitter accounts created between April 30th and May 20th, 2023. All of them follow at least two of the following accounts: @AoTJewels, @BlackYellow, @Fenerbahce, and @elonmusk ,and tweet via Twitter for Android or the Twitter Web App.
The 1627 accounts in this network all use GAN-generated faces as their profile pics. All of these images have neutral backgrounds and are 255x255 pixels (Twitter default is 400x400).
(GAN = "generative adversial network", the technology used to generate the "face" images)
It's a Saturday in May, and a reply spam network is busy spamming people's replies with extremely similar tweets encouraging them to log into an obscure website with supplied login credentials. (The login info is the same in every reply.)
The website promoted by the spam accounts (uu55111 dot com) describes itself as a "financial income platform" and claims to offer various crypto-related financial services. Needless to say, obscure financial websites promoted by spam networks should be approached with distrust.
The reply spam network promoting this website consists of (at least) 9688 accounts created in March/April 2023. All have usernames ending in random digits and all have thus far tweeted exclusively via the Twitter Web App.
It's a great day to look at a network of mutually interacting Twitter accounts that use TweetDeck to amplify one another's content, most (but not all) of which is Florida-related. #FloridaSpam
Much of the network's content consists of brief tweetstorms where several of the accounts in the network tweet or retweet the same thing a few seconds or minutes apart. Overall, approximately 70% of the network's tweets/retweets were duplicated by at least 3 of the 7 accounts.
Popular chatbot ChatGPT will sometimes return error messages when asked to produce offensive content. If you're a spam network operator who uses ChatGPT to generate spam and you're not paying attention, these messages will show up in the spam you generate.
This spam network consists of (at least) 59645 Twitter accounts, mostly created between 2010 and 2016. All of their recent tweets were sent via the Twitter Web App. Some accounts have old unrelated tweets followed by a multi-year gap, which suggests they were hijacked/purchased.
Although most of this network's tweets are (superficially) unique, there are some exact duplicates, which fall into two categories:
If you're someone with integrity at @thedailybeast, this is a good time to give the public a look at what's going on behind the scenes and why an article containing demonstrable falsehoods and harassment from a known cyberstalker is still on your website.
Given the amount of time that has passed, the degree of pushback, and the repeated debunking of the article's primary source and elements, there is no scenario in which this is innocent. Someone at The Daily Beast is 100% aware the article is false and is keeping it up anyway.
This isn't going away, and the damage to the reputations of The Daily Beast and everyone associated with it grows harder to reverse with each passing moment. In life, there are bells you don't unring, and platforming an abusive cyberstalker is one of them.