More thoughts on the Garland piece that came out in WaPo this morning.
Carol Leonnig and Aaron Davis are both fantastic reporters. My irritation with the piece was more how I knew it would play on Twitter vs the actual content of the piece. 1/X
The never-Garland folks are going all in demanding that he be fired 🙄 after a 37 count indictment of Donald Trump.
The same people who were *pissed* (rightfully so) that Trump politicized DOJ are mad that Biden didn’t do the same thing.
Did Garland move slower than he should have? Maybe so, but let’s not undercut the work DOJ did to get us to this point; remember, Jack Smith didn’t start from zero — he picked up where DOJ left off and continued to follow the same facts.
Finally, I respect a lot of the voices who are concerned with this piece—and I get it—but I have to (again) stress the mindset of the top officials at DOJ:
If you’re going to be the first one in history to prosecute a POTUS, you better get it right.
Slow is better than failed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On my commute today, a podcast was talking about leadership and integrity, and I got to thinking about one of the most impressive examples of both that I’ve ever seen.
Story time with Angry: 1/X
In August of 2011, the remains of the servicemen lost on Extortion 17 were returned to the United States. They were received in the same place they always are — Dover AFB in Delaware.
Obama came out to pay his respects, and a couple things will always stick with me: 2/X
1. He spoke to *every* person there, and I mean everyone. Man, woman, child, serviceman, everyone.
2. He stood at attention for almost an hour — in a full suit in the middle of the summer and inside an aircraft hangar — while 30 caskets were offloaded. 3/X
Think of the threat spectrum like a sliding scale. It always changes, but it generally ranges from “no threat” on the left (the good side of the scale) to “terrorists have weapons of mass destruction” on the right (bad side of the scale). 2/X
One thing we’ve noticed throughout the years is that the more pressure we put on terrorist groups “over there,” the lower the overall threat spectrum is “over here.”
This makes sense. The more time they spend trying to stay alive, the less time they have to plan attacks. 3/X
I don’t like to armchair quarterback deadly force encounters, but there’s something we need to talk about.
Police training.
The results were very different, but what we saw in Uvalde and in Tennessee were both examples of just really bad small unit / close quarters tactics. 1/3
In Tennessee, the officers did the right thing: they went straight for (and neutralized) the threat.
They also made entirely too much noise, flagged their buddies with their muzzles about 10 times and committed errors that would have gotten them killed in most situations. 2/3
If we aren’t going to do anything meaningful to stop school shootings — and obviously we aren’t — we should probably at least make sure the people who are tasked with responding to them understand how to effectively respond to them. 3/3
Mariupol would have been more than just industrial cash-flow for Putin and the separatists territories — it was also vital if he wanted a land bridge to Crimea, which we know was a major goal in the early part of his 2022 invasion.
Think back to early in the war when the Azov Regiment heroically held out during the Siege of Mariupol. That operation diverted thousands of Russian forces from other areas, and bought the Ukrainians time to shore up defenses elsewhere. 3/X