Inviting History Profile picture
Jun 19, 2023 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
One June 19th, 1787, Sophie Hélène Béatrice, the fourth child born to Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI, died at just under one year old. Her loss is reflected in this portrait by Vigee-Lebrun, which includes an empty cradle where Sophie would have been painted. Image
Marie Antoinette wrote to her sister in law Elisabeth, asking her to visit the Trianon after her daughter's death, "... we are mourning the death of my poor little angel. Farewell dear heart, you know how much I love you and I need your whole heart to comfort mine."
Elisabeth wrote to her friend, "I have been to [Trianon] the last few days with [the queen] and there was no attention she did not show me. ... what we did most was to weep over the death of my poor little niece." Image
Again writing to Bombelles, Elisabeth wrote how she hoped that Sophie would pray well for her (intercession) and "If you only knew how pretty she was when she died! It’s incredible. The day before, she was white and the color of pink, not thin; finally charming." Image
And no, none of the lovely detailed pastel or sketch drawings said to be young Sophie are actually Sophie. More information on these depictions here: invitinghistory.com/2021/07/the-mi… Image
The only absolutely-positively-confirmed depiction of Sophie we have is this crop from an image depicting the royal family: Image
There is also this allegorical portrait attributed to Gautier-Dagoty, and the assumption is that the blurry profile on the left is perhaps meant to be Sophie. But Dagoty died in 1786 before Sophie's death and the artist & subject of the painting is unconfirmed. Image
The autopsy of young Sophie concluded that she had died from a bacterial infection, possibly but not necessarily related to tuberculosis." She had a simple funeral. Image
On June 15th of 1787, Louis XVI had written in his notes, 'My youngest daughter's illness prevents me from hunting." On the 19th, he wrote, "Death of my youngest daughter at 3 o'clock. Walk in Saint-Cyr." Image
Related note: Fersen mythologers who pounce on Louis XVI writing 'Birth of the duc of Normandie, same as that of my son' as evidence Louis Charles wasn't his still pretend that Sophie must have also been Fersen's, even though Louis XVI wrote repeatedly of her, "MY daughter."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Inviting History

Inviting History Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @invitinghistory

Jan 20, 2024
After his final meeting with his family, Louis XVI fell upon his bed, weeping, and said to the abbe de Edgeworth: "What a meeting have I gone through. Why should I love so tenderly, and why should I be so tenderly beloved?"
Let's look at the accounts of this meeting. Image
Louis XVI had asked to see his family with no witnesses, and this was partially granted. Louis XVI could see his family in the dining room of the Temple, where there was a glass partition window, which would allow municipals to watch them without (theoretically) hearing them. Image
Louis XVI asked the valet Cléry to bring water and a glass for his family. Cléry brought a bottle of iced water that was on the dining table, and Louis XVI asked him to bring water that is not iced. "If the queen drank [iced water] it might make her ill." Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 19, 2023
Since it's apparently #WorldToiletDay: Contrary to popular myth, the palace of Versailles did have toilets and bathrooms. At the time, bathrooms were luxury rooms dedicated to bathing, while toilet facilities were kept in separate spaces. (contd) Image
During Versailles time as a residence, toilet facilities ranged from various types of toilet chairs and commodes to chamber pots as well as public lavatories and, by 1789, 9 flushing toilets in private apartments. Some apartments had "toilet rooms" (marked "chaise").
Image
Image
If you lived at Versailles in an apartment, you might have a toilet room or you might not. Some apartments--the larger ones--had more than one toilet room. If you didn't have a toilet room, you could still have a toilet chair to put wherever you wished. Image
Read 13 tweets
Jul 25, 2023
Historical Barbie thread! It's time to finally dig into the 18th century, along with the early 19th century since there isn't much there and I feel like combining eras for my own sake. First up: "THE" 18th century Barbie... Marie Antoinette! Image
This doll was inspired by a court portrait of Marie Antoinette, with one rather strange added detail: she's wearing the infamous "Affair of the Necklace" necklace, or rather, a piece based on the most famous version of it. No idea why, a very bizarre thing to add here. Image
Next up is a Bob Mackie treat: "Madame du Barbie," released in 1997. Her stylized look reminds me of 1930s-1940s old Hollywood period films, lots of glitz and glam. Image
Read 24 tweets
Jul 2, 2023
One of the claims in the "Naked Cooks, Excrement, Rats: The Secretly Disgusting History of Royal Palaces," article is that James IV/I never bathed, and subsequently the rooms he occupied were lice-filled. Is this true? Let's take a look... History.com

Image
Image
The article, for reference, if you've never read it: If you're a follower or you follow accounts like @fakehistoryhunt you probably already know that a lot of information in this article is untrue/debunked or misleading. But what about the claim re: James?history.com/news/royal-pal…
The article doesn't provide specific citations, but the main source for a lot the specific claims and wording in the article appears to be 'The Royal Art of Poisons' by Eleanor Herman, a book referenced in the article itself. History.com
Image
Read 42 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
Another distortion in Chevalier: Marie-Josephine, the marquise de Montalembert and her husband. The film portrays the marquis de Montalembert as a stodgy military men who has great disdain for the arts and forbids his wife from being on the stage. The reality? Well...
The real marquis de Montalembert was a military man who specialized in engineering. He was also (drumroll) a playwright who ran a theater with his wife, Marie-Josephine, who acted on stage. So not only was he a lover of theatrical arts, he ran a theater and his wife performed.
The real Marie-Josephine hired Saint-Georges to conduct at the society theater she and her husband ran. He was effectively "lent" by his current employer, as he needed permission to work elsewhere due to his being part of the employed household of the duc d'Orleans.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 20, 2023
The takes about Titanic being a ship "for the wealthy" have been popping up because of the submarine, and idk how to tell people that the vast majority of Titanic's passengers were third-class passengers traveling to/from America. It was a passenger liner, not a luxury yacht. Image
Third-class passengers had the highest capacity (around 1,100 top capacity for 3rd class--she wasn't full for her maiden voyage) as these types of passenger liners saw their bread and butter with the "average" person and families making these crossings to/from America.
Third class passengers also had the lowest passenger survival rate during the disaster. While there is no evidence for the full-size gates featured in Titanic films, and no evidence for any concentrated effort to keep third class passengers as a whole away from the boats--
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(